Quotes
Quotes by atheists, freethinkers, humanists,
agnostics, skeptics and disbelievers. Not all of them are atheists,
but most were, or are, against organized religion. If we don't have
your favorite quote listed on this page, email it to us at rational@rationalatheist.com.
The source is listed if known to us. These
quotes are gleaned from several sources on the net and from books
that we own, however, we would like to acknowledge the two best
databases on the web for atheist quotes, Celebrity
Atheist List, and Positive
Athesim's Big List of Quotations. Thank you to both of these
sites for all your hard work and activism.
Feel free to use any of the banners below
to help promote your favorite disbelievers on this site. It may
take a while for all the images to load, please be patient. The
text should come up right away, however. |
| |
| |
• I was unable to devote myself to
the learning of this algebra and the continued concentration upon
it, because of obstacles in the vagaries of time which hindered
me; for we have been deprived of all the people of knowledge save
for a group, small in number, with many troubles, whose concern
in life is to snatch the opportunity, when time is asleep, to
devote themselves meanwhile to the investigation and perfection
of a science; for the majority of people who imitate philosophers
confuse the true with the false, and they do nothing but deceive
and pretend knowledge, and they do not use what they know of the
sciences except for base and material purposes; and if they see
a certain person seeking for the right and preferring the truth,
doing his best to refute the false and untrue and leaving aside
hypocrisy and deceit, they make a fool of him and mock him.
Treatise
on Demonstration of Problems of Algebra, 1070
<TOP>
|
| |

• A man of understanding
has lost nothing, if he has himself.
• Each man calls barbarism
what is not his own practice for indeed it seems we have no other
test of truth and reason that the example and pattern of the opinions
and customs of the country we live in.
• Even on the most exalted
throne in the world we are only sitting on our own bottom.
• I prefer the company
of peasants because they have not been educated sufficiently to
reason incorrectly.
• Nothing is so firmly
believed as what we least know.
• Rejoice in the things
that are present; all else is beyond thee.
• The value of life lies
not in the length of days, but in the use we make of them... Whether
you find satisfaction in life depends not on your tale of years,
but on your will.
• We can be knowledgable
with other men's knowledge but we cannot be wise with other men's
wisdom.
<TOP>
|
| |
• All
places are alike, and every earth is fit for burial.
• Hell
hath no limits, nor is circumscrib'd one self place; for where we
are is Hell, and where Hell is, there must we ever be.
• Money
can't buy love, but it improves your bargaining position.
• I
count religion but a childish toy, And hold there is no sin but
ignorance.
• Religion hides many mischiefs
from suspicion.
quoted from James A Haught, "Honest Minds, Past and Present"
talk for History of Freethought conference Sept. 20-21, 1997, Cincinnati,
Ohio sponsored by Council for Secular Humanism and Free Inquiry
Group
• Religion! O Diabole!
Fie, I am asham'd, however that I seem,
To think a word of such simple sound,
Of such great matter should be made the ground.
the Duke of Guise, commenting on the misuse of religion as a
source of power, in The Massacre of Paris, quoted from Jim Herrick,
Against the Faith (1985), p. 30
<TOP>
|
| |
• In
religion,
What damned error but some sober brow
Will bless it, and approve it with a text,
Hiding the grossness with fair ornament?
The Merchant of Venice, Act 3, Scene 2
• Thrust
your head into the public street, to gaze on Christian fools with
varnish'd faces.
The Merchant of Venice, Act 2, Scene 5
• Methinks
sometimes I have no more wit than a Christian.
Twelfth Night, Act 1, Scene 3
• His
worst fault is, he's given to prayer; he is something peevish that
way.
The Merry Wives of Windsor, Act 1, Scene 4
• I
always thought it was both impious and unnatural that such immanity
and bloody strife should reign among professors of one faith.
I Henry VI, Act 5, Scene I
• It
is a heretic that makes the fire, not she which burns in it.
The Winter's Tale, Act 2, Scene 3
• Modest
doubt is call'd the beacon of the wise.
Troilus and Cressida, Act 2, Scene 2
• In
the most high and palmy state of Rome,
A little ere the mightiest Julius fell,
The graves stood tenantless, and the sheeted dead
Did squeak and gibber in the Roman streets.
Hamlet, 1. 1
• And then it started like
a guilty thing
Upon a fearful summons.
Hamlet, 1. 1
• All that lives must die,
Passing through nature to eternity.
Hamlet, 1. 2
<TOP>
|
|
• Setting themselves against reason,
as often as reason is against them.
Works (III, p. 91), (ed. 1839)
• No arts; no letters; no society; and
which is worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death;
and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.
Leviathan (pt. I, Of Man, ch. XVIII)
• Fear of power invisible, feigned by
the mind or imagined from tales publicly allowed, [is] religion;
not allowed, superstition.
Leviathan: The Matter, Form, and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiastical
and Civil (1651), quoted from Jonathon Green, The Cassell Dictionary
of Cynical Quotations
• Leisure is the mother of philosophy.
• No Discourse whatsoever, can End in
absolute Knowledge of Fact.
Leviathan: The Matter, Form, and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiastical
and Civil, i. vii. 30 (1651)
• A man's conscience and his judgment
is the same thing, and, as the judgment, so also the conscience
may be erroneous.
Leviathan: The Matter, Form, and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiastical
and Civil, xxix. (1651)
• Curiosity draws a man from consideration
of the effect, to seek the cause.
Leviathan: The Matter, Form, and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiastical
and Civil, i. xi. 51. (1651)
• Silence is sometimes an argument of
Consent.
Leviathan: The Matter, Form, and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiastical
and Civil, ii. xxvi. (1651)
• In a Democracy, look how many Demagogs
[that is] how many powerful Orators there are with the people.
Philosophical Rudiments Concerning Government and Society (1651),
x. 6. 153
• Heresy is a word which, when it is
used without passion, signifies a private opinion. So the different
sects of the old philosophers, Academians, Peripatetics, Epicureans,
Stoics, &c., were called heresies.
Behemoth; the History of the Civil Wars in England (1679)
• The best men are the least suspicious
of fraudulent purposes.
Leviathan: The Matter, Form, and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiastical
and Civil, iv. xlvi. 379. (1651)
• I am about to take my last voyage,
a great leap in the dark.
Thomas Hobbes' last words
<TOP>
|
|
• Philosophy has no end in view, save
truth. Faith looks for nothing but obedience and piety.
• Those who wish to seek out the cause
of miracles, and to understand the things of nature as philosophers,
and not to stare at them in astonishment like fools, are soon considered
heretical and impious, and proclaimed as such by those whom the
mob adores as the interpreters of nature and the gods. For these
men know that, once ignorance is put aside, that wonderment would
be taken away, which is the only means by which their authority
is preserved.
• The world would be happier if men
had the same capacity to be silent that they have to speak
• The highest activity a human being
can attain is learning for understanding, because to understand
is to be free
• I do not know how to teach philosophy
without becoming a disturber of established religion
• Do not weep. Do not wax indignant.
Understand.
• If you want the present to be different
from the past, study the past.
• I believe that a triangle, if it could
speak, would say that God is eminently triangular, and a circle
that the divine nature is eminently circular; and thus would every
one ascribe his own attributes to God.
Epistles, 60
• Laws which prescribe what everyone
must believe, and forbid men to say or write anything against this
or that opinion, are often passed to gratify, or rather to appease
the anger of those who cannot abide independent minds. Theological
Political Treatise (1670), quoted from Laird Wilcox, ed., "The
Degeneration of Belief"
<TOP>
|
|
• All mankind... being all equal and
independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty
or possessions.
• I have always thought the actions
of men the best interpreters of their thoughts.
• No man's knowledge here can go beyond
his experience.
• Reading furnishes the mind only with
materials of knowledge; it is thinking that makes what we read ours.
• So that, in effect, religion, which
should most distinguish us from beasts, and ought most peculiarly
to elevate us, as rational creatures, above brutes, is that wherein
men most often appear most irrational, and more senseless than beasts
themselves. Credo, quia impossibile est: I believe, because it is
impossible, might, in a good man, pass for a sally of zeal; but
would prove a very ill rule for men to choose their opinions or
religion by.
An
Essay Concerning Human Understanding
• Faith is the assent to any proposition
not made out by the deduction of reason but upon the credit of the
proposer.
An
Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1690), quoted from Laird
Wilcox, ed., "The Degeneration of Belief"
• The Church which taught men not to
keep faith with heretics, had no claim to toleration.
from F H Perrycoste, Influence of Religion upon Truthfulness
(p. 171); quoted from Joseph Lewis The Ten Commandments (p. 558)
• I find every sect, as far as reason
will help them, make use of it gladly; and where it fails them,
they cry out, it is a matter of faith, and above reason.
• New opinions are always suspected,
and usually opposed, without any other reason but because they are
not already common.
Essay
on Human Understanding
• The care of souls cannot belong to
the civil magistrate.
from A Letter Concerning Toleration, quoted by Martha M McCarthy
in A Delicate Balance: Church, State, and the Schools
<TOP>
|
|

• History is full of
religious wars; but, we must take care to observe, it was not
the multiplicity of religions that produced these wars, it was
the intolerating spirit which animated that one which thought
she had the power of governing.
Persian Letters (1721)
• False happiness renders
men stern and proud, and that happiness is never communicated.
True happiness renders them kind and sensible, and that happiness
is always shared.
• There is no crueller
tyranny than that which is perpetuated under the shield of law
and in the name of justice.
• To become truly great,
one has to stand with people, not above them.
• We should weep for
men at their birth, not at their death.
• It is always the adventurous
who accomplish great things.
• No kingdom has shed
more blood than the kingdom of Christ.
• The less men think,
the more they talk.
• No kingdom has ever
had as many civil wars as the kingdom of Christ.
Lettres persanes (1721), quoted from Encarta Book of Quotations
(1999)
• If triangles made a
god, they would give him three sides.
Lettres Persanes, letter 59 (1721)
<TOP>
|
|
• I disapprove of what you say, but
I will defend to the death your right to say it.
• Judge a man by his questions rather
than by his answers.
• It is dangerous to be right when the
government is wrong.
• Whenever an important event, a revolution,
or a calamity turns to the profit of the church, such is always
signalised as the Finger of God.
Philosophical Dictionary (1764), quoted from Jonathon Green,
The Cassell Dictionary of Cynical Quotations
• Custom, law bent my first years to
the religion of the happy Muslims. I see it too clearly: the care
taken of our childhood forms our feelings, our habits, our belief.
By the Ganges I would have been a slave of the false gods, a Christian
in Paris, a Muslim here.
Zaïre, in Mahomet, quoted from Jim Herrick, "Écrasez
l'Infâme," in Against the Faith
• As you know, the Inquisition is an
admirable and wholly Christian invention to make the pope and the
monks more powerful and turn a whole kingdom into hypocrites.
Philosophical Dictionary, quoted from Albert J Menendez and
Edd Doerr, The Great Quotations on Religious Freedom
• Of all religions the Christian is
without doubt the one which should inspire tolerance most, although
up to now the Christians have been the most intolerant of all men.
from Harry Elmer Barnes, An Intellectual and Cultural History
of the Western World (1937) p. 766, quoted from Albert J Menendez
and Edd Doerr, The Great Quotations on Religious Freedom
• Christian: A good-natured, simple
fellow; a true lamb of the fold, who, in the innocence of his heart,
persuades himself that he firmly believes unbelievable things that
his priests have told him to believe, especially those he cannot
even imagine. Consequently, he is convinced that three x's make
fifteen, that God was made man, that he was hanged and rose to life
again, that priests cannot lie, and that all who do not believe
in priests will be damned without remission.
Philosophical Dictionary, quoted from Chaz Bufe, The Devil's
Dictionaries, "Introduction" (2004; 1992, 1995)
• The son of God is the same as the
son of man; the son of man is the same as the son of God. God, the
father, is the same as Christ, the son; Christ, the son, is the
same as God, the father. This language may appear confused to unbelievers,
but Christians will readily understand it.
quoted from John E Remsberg, The Christ
• Which is more dangerous: fanaticism
or atheism? Fanaticism is certainly a thousand times more deadly;
for atheism inspires no bloody passion whereas fanaticism does;
atheism is opposed to crime and fanaticism causes crimes to be committed.
• Nothing can be more contrary to religion
and the clergy than reason and common sense.
Philosophical Dictionary, 1764
• The truths of religion are never
so well understood as by those who have lost their power of reasoning.
Philosophical Dictionary, 1764
• Theological religion is the source
of all imaginable follies and disturbances; it is the parent of
fanaticism and civil discord; it is the enemy of mankind.
Philosophical Dictionary, 1764
• I have never made but one prayer to
God, a very short one: 'O, Lord, make my enemies ridiculous.' And
God granted it.
Letter to M. Damilaville / May 16, 1767
• I am very fond of truth, but not
at all of martyrdom.
Letter to d'Alembert / August 20, 1770
• Superstition is to religion what astrology
is to astronomy; the mad daughter of a wise mother
• It is one of the superstitions of the human mind to have
imagined that virginity could be a virtue.
• Let us
therefore reject all superstition in order to become more human;
but in speaking against fanaticism, let us not imitate the fanatics:
they are sick men in delirium who want to chastise their doctors.
Let us assuage their ills, and never embitter them, and let us pour
drop by drop into their souls the divine balm of toleration, which
they would reject with horror if it were offered to them all at
once.
Homélies prononcées à Londres, quoted from
Jim Herrick, "Écrasez l'Infâme," in Against
the Faith
<TOP>
|
|
• To Follow by faith alone is to follow
blindly.
• We are all born ignorant, but one
must work hard to remain stupid.
• If a man empties his purse into his
head, no man can take it away from him. An investment in knowledge
always pays the best interest.
• Some people die at 25 and aren't buried
until 75.
• Being ignorant is not so much a shame,
as being unwilling to learn.
• When a religion is good, I conceive
it will support itself; and when it does not support itself, and
God does not take care to support it so that its professors are
obliged to call for help of the civil power, 'tis a sign, I apprehend,
of its being a bad one.
letter to Richard Price, October 9, 1780, quoted from Adrienne
Koch, ed., The American Enlightenment: The Shaping of the American
Experiment and a Free Society, New York: George Braziller, 1965,
p. 93.
• The way to see by faith is to shut
the eye of reason: The Morning Daylight appears plainer when you
put out your Candle.
the incompatibility of faith and reason, Poor Richard's Almanack
(1758)
• I have found Christian dogma unintelligible.
Early in life I absented myself from Christian assemblies.
quoted from Victor J Stenger, Has Science Found God? (2001)
• Many a long dispute among divines
may be thus abridged: It is so; It is not so. It is so; it is not
so.
Poor Richard's Almanack, 1743
• If we look back into history for the
character of the present sects in Christianity, we shall find few
that have not in their turns been persecutors, and complainers of
persecution. The primitive Christians thought persecution extremely
wrong in the pagans, but practiced it on one another. The first
Protestants of the Church of England blamed persecution in the Romish
Church, but practiced it upon the Puritans. These found it wrong
in the bishops, but fell into the same practice themselves both
here and in New England.
An Essay on Toleration
• Lighthouses are more helpful than
churches.
• He [the Rev Mr. Whitefield] used, indeed, sometimes to pray
for my conversion, but never had the satisfaction of believing that
his prayers were heard.
from Franklin's Autobiography
<TOP>
|
|
• Generally speaking, the errors in
religion are dangerous; those in philosophy only ridiculous
• A wise man proportions his belief
to the evidence
• Nothing is more surprising than the
easiness with which the many are governed by the few.
• I have written on all sorts of subjects
. . . yet I have no enemies; except indeed all the Whigs, all the
Tories, and all the Christians.
• The Christian religion not only was
at first attended with miracles, but even at this day cannot be
believed by any reasonable person without one. Mere reason is insufficient
to convince us of its veracity: and whoever is moved by faith to
assent to it, is conscious of a continued miracle in his own person,
which subverts all the principles of his understanding, and gives
him a determination to believe what is most contrary to custom and
experience.
An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (1748), quoted from
Encarta® Book of Quotations (1999)
• Nothing is so convenient as a decisive
argument ... which must at least silence the most arrogant bigotry
and superstition, and free us from their impertinent solicitations.
I flatter myself, that I have discovered an argument ... which,
if just, will, with the wise and learned, be an everlasting check
to all kinds of superstitious delusion, and consequently, will be
useful as long as the world endures. For so long, I presume, will
the accounts of miracles and prodigies be found in all history,
sacred and profane.
An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, 10(1), quoted from
Antony Flew, Atheistic Humanism, p. 69
• A miracle is a violation of the laws
of nature, and as a firm and unalterable experience has established
these laws, the proof against a miracle, from the very nature of
the fact, is as entire as any argument from experience can possibly
be imagined.... Nothing is esteemed a miracle, if it ever happens
in the common course of nature.... There must, therefore, be an
uniform experience against every miraculous event, otherwise the
event would not merit that appellation. And as an uniform experience
amounts to a proof, there is here a direct and full proof, from
the nature of the fact, against the existence of any miracle.
An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding
• When any one tells me, that he saw
a dead man restored to life, I immediately consider with myself,
whether it be more probable, that this person should either deceive
or be deceived, or that the fact, which he relates, should really
have happened. I weigh the one miracle against the other; and according
to the superiority, which I discover, I pronounce my decision, and
always reject the greater miracle.
An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding
• Examine the religious principles which
have, in fact, prevailed in the world, and you will scarcely be
persuaded that they are anything but sick men's dreams.
quoted by James A Haught in "Honest Minds, Past and Present"
Talks for History of Freethought Conference, September 20-21, 1997,
Cincinnati, Ohio sponsored by Council for Secular Humanism and Free
Inquiry Group
• I say then, that belief is nothing
but a more vivid, lively, forcible, firm, steady conception of an
object, than what the imagination alone is ever able to attain.
This variety of terms, which may seem so unphilosophical, is intended
only to express that act of the mind, which renders realities, or
what is taken for such, more present to us than fictions, causes
them to weigh more in the thought, and gives them a superior influence
on the passions and imagination.
An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, section v, part ii
(1748)
<TOP> |
|

• If you want me to believe
in God, you must make me touch him.
• Man will never be free
until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last
priest.
• There are three principal
means of acquiring knowledge available to us: observation of nature,
reflection, and experimentation. Observation collects facts; reflection
combines them; experimentation verifies the result of that combination.
Our observation of nature must be diligent, our reflection profound,
and our experiments exact. We rarely see these three means combined;
and for this reason, creative geniuses are not common.
On the Interpretation of Nature, no. 15 (1753), repr. in Lester
G Crocker, ed., Selected Writings, ed. (1966), quoted from The
Columbia Dictionary of Quotations
• When superstition is
allowed to perform the task of old age in dulling the human temperament,
we can say goodbye to all excellence in poetry, in painting, and
in music.
Philosophic Thoughts, ch. 3 (1746), repr. in Lester G Crocker,
ed., Selected Writings, ed. (1966), quoted from The Columbia Dictionary
of Quotations
• To attempt the destruction
of our passions is the height of folly. What a noble aim is that
of the zealot who tortures himself like a madman in order to desire
nothing, love nothing, feel nothing, and who, if he succeeded,
would end up a complete monster!
Philosophic Thoughts, ch. 5 (1746), repr. in Lester G Crocker,
ed., Selected Writings, ed. (1966), quoted from The Columbia Dictionary
of Quotations
• Wandering in a vast
forest at night, I have only a faint light to guide me. A stranger
appears and says to me: "My friend, you should blow out your
candle in order to find your way more clearly." This stranger
is a theologian.
Addition aux Pensees philosophiques, from John Daintith, et
al, eds. The Macmillan Dictionary of Quotations (2000) p. 34,
quoted from R, Rotando, in a personal letter to Cliff Walker (December
17, 2001)
• At an early age I sucked
up the milk of Homer, Virgil, Horace, Terence, Anacreon, Plato
and Euripides, diluted with that of Moses and the prophets.
describing the impact which the classics had made upon him,
quoted from Jim Herrick, Against the Faith (1985), p. 72
• But if you will recall
the history of our civil troubles, you will see half the nation
bathe itself, out of piety, in the blood of the other half, and
violate the fundamental feelings of humanity in order to sustain
the cause of God: as though it were necessary to cease to be a
man in order to prove oneself religious!
reproving religious conflict in a dedicatory epistle, quoted
from Jim Herrick, Against the Faith (1985), pp. 71-2
• Superstition is more
injurious to God than atheism.
Pensées Philosophiques (1746), quoted from Jim Herrick,
Against the Faith (1985), p. 73
• If there were a reason
for preferring the Christian religion to natural religion, it
would be because the former offers us, on the nature of God and
man, enlightenment that the latter lacks. Now, this is not at
all the case; for Christianity, instead of clarifying, gives rise
to an infinite multitude of obscurities and difficulties.
Pensées Philosophiques (1746), quoted from Jim Herrick,
Against the Faith (1985), p. 73
• Gentleness and peacefulness
regulate our proceedings; theirs are dictated by fury. We employ
reason, they accumulate faggots. They preach nothing but love,
and breathe nothing but blood. Their words are humane, but their
hearts are cruel.
a favorable portrayal of the "tranquil abode" of
the chestnut path of philosophical deism, in The Sceptic's Walk
(1747), which Diderot described as a 'conversation concerning
religion, philosophy and the world," quoted from and citation
quips derived from Jim Herrick, Against the Faith (1985), p. 73
• I believe in God, although
I live very happily with atheists.... It is very important not
to mistake hemlock for parsley; but not at all so to believe or
not in God.
conceding to Voltaire's defence of the concept of God (during
a letter dialogue sparked by Voltaire's letter commenting on Letter
to the Blind), though quoted from Jim Herrick, Against the Faith
(1985), p. 75
• One must be oneself
very little of a philosopher not to feel that the finest privilege
of our reason consists in not believing in anything by the impulsion
of a blind and mechanical instinct, and that it is to dishonour
reason to put it in bonds as the Chaldeans did. Man is born to
think for himself.
articulating the philosophes' belief in their own capacities,
in "Chaldeans" of L'Encyclopédie, quoted from
and citation quip derived from Jim Herrick, Against the Faith
(1985), p. 78
• I am more affected
by the attractions of virtue than by the deformities of vice;
I turn gently away from the wicked and I fly to meet the good.
If there is in a literary work, in a character, in a picture,
in a statue, a beautiful spot, that is where my eyes rest; I see
only that, I remember only that, all the rest is well-nigh forgotten.
What becomes of me when the whole work is beautiful!
quoted from Jean Starobinski, The Man Who Told Secrets, reviewed
in The New York Review of Books, Vol. XX, No. 4, March 22, 1973,
pp. 18-21.
• It seems to me that
if one had kept silence up to now regarding religion, people would
still be submerged in the most grotesque and dangerous superstition
... regarding government, we would still be groaning under the
bonds of feudal government ... regarding morals, we would still
be having to learn what is virtue and what is vice. To forbid
all these discussions, the only ones worthy of occupying a good
mind, is to perpetuate the reign of ignorance and barbarism.
from "an essay on Seneca was expanded into a work on
Claudius and Nero" (Herrick), quoted from Jim Herrick, Against
the Faith (1985), p. 84
• Scepticism is the
first step towards truth.
Pensées Philosophiques (1746), quoted from Jim Herrick,
Against the Faith (1985), p. 77
• From fanaticism to
barbarism is only one step.
Essai sur le Mérite de la Vertu (1745)
• The philosopher has
never killed any priests, whereas the priest has killed a great
many philosophers.
Observations on Drawing Up of Laws (1774), repr. in Lester
G Crocker, ed., Selected Writings, ed. (1966), quoted from The
Columbia Dictionary of Quotations
• No man has received
from nature the right to give orders to others. Freedom is a gift
from heaven, and every individual of the same species has the
right to enjoy it as soon as he is in enjoyment of his reason.
"Political Authority," from L'Encyclopédie
|
John Adams
|
• The
divinity of Jesus is made a convenient cover for absurdity.
• The
government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on
the Christian religion.
Treaty of Tripoly, article 11
• Let
the human mind loose. It must be loose. It will be loose. Superstition
and dogmatism cannot confine it.
• As
I understand the Christian religion, it was, and is, a revelation.
But how has it happened that millions of fables, tales, legends,
have been blended with both Jewish and Christian revelation that
have made them the most bloody religion that ever existed?
Written in a letter
to F.A. Van der Kamp, December 27, 1816.
• What havoc
has been made of books through every century of the Christian era?
Where are fifty gospels condemned as spurious by the bull of Pope
Gelasius? Where are forty wagon-loads of Hebrew manuscripts burned
in France, by order of another pope, because of suspected heresy?
Remember the Index Expurgato-rius, the Inquisition, the stake, the
axe, the halter, and the guillotine; and, oh! horrible, the rack!
This is as bad, if not worse, than a slow fire. Nor should the Lion's
Mouth be forgotten. Have you considered that system of holy lies
and pious frauds that has raged and triumphed for 1,500 years.
Written in a letter to John Taylor, 1814.
• The question
before the human race is, whether the God of nature shall govern
the world by his own laws, or whether priests and kings shall rule
it by fictitious miracles.
Written in a letter to Thomas Jefferson, June 20, 1815
<TOP>
|
|
• Toleration is not the opposite of
intolerance but the counterfeit of it. Both are despotisms: the
one assumes to itself the right of withholding liberty of conscience,
the other of granting it.
The
Rights of Man
• The
study of theology, as it stands in the Christian churches, is the
study of nothing; it is founded on nothing; it rests on no
principles; it proceeds by no authorities; it has no data; it can
demonstrate nothing; and it admits of no conclusion. Not anything
can be studied as a science, without our being in possession of
the
principles upon which it is founded; and as this is not the case
with Christian theology, it is therefore the study of nothing.
Submitted by Robert
Umbehant
• He that would make his own liberty
secure, must guard even his enemy from oppression.
Dissertations
on First Principles of Government (July 7, 1795), as quoted
by Joseph Lewis in Inspiration
and Wisdom from the Writings of Thomas Paine
• An avidity to punish is always dangerous
to liberty. It leads men to stretch, to misinterpret, and to misapply
even the best of laws. He that would make his own liberty secure,
must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this
duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself.
Dissertations
on First Principles of Government (July 7, 1795), quoted from
Laird Wilcox, ed., The
Writer's Rights (2002) p. 31
• It is necessary to the happiness of
man that he be mentally faithful to himself. Infidelity does not
consist in believing, or in disbelieving, it consists in professing
to believe what one does not believe.
The
Age of Reason (1794)
• I have always strenuously supported
the right of every man to his own opinion, however different that
opinion might be to mine. He who denies another this right makes
a slave of himself to his present opinion, because he precludes
himself the right of changing it.
The
Age of Reason (1794), quoted from Laird Wilcox, ed., The
Writer's Rights (2002) p. 31
• Independence is my happiness, and
I view things as they are, without regard to place or person; my
country is the world, and my religion is to do good.
The
Rights of Man
• The circumstances of the world are
continually changing, and the opinions of men change also; and as
government is for the living, and not for the dead, it is the living
only that has any right in it. That which may be thought right and
found convenient in one age, may be thought wrong and found inconvenient
in another. In such cases, who is to decide, the living, or the
dead?
as quoted by Joseph Lewis in Inspiration
and Wisdom from the Writings of Thomas Paine
• Customs will often outlive the remembrance
of their origin.
as quoted by Joseph Lewis in Inspiration
and Wisdom from the Writings of Thomas Paine
• A man will pass better through the
world with a thousand open errors upon his back than in being detected
in one sly falsehood. When one is detected, a thousand are suspected.
in a letter to George Washington (30 July 1796) discussing Paine's
service to America, as quoted by Joseph Lewis in Inspiration
and Wisdom from the Writings of Thomas Paine
• The character which Mr. Washington
has attempted to act in the world is a sort of nondescribable, chameleon-colored
thing called prudence. It is, in many cases, a substitute for principle,
and is so nearly allied to hypocrisy that it easily slides into
it. His genius for prudence furnished him in this instance with
an expedient that served, as is the natural and general character
of all expedients, to diminish the embarrassments of the moment
and multiply them afterwards; for he authorized it to be made known
to the French Government, as a confidential matter (Mr. Washington
should recollect that I was a member of the Convention, and had
the means of knowing what I here state), he authorized it, I say,
to be announced, and that for the purpose of preventing any uneasiness
to France on the score of Mr. Jay's mission to England, that the
object of that mission, and of Mr. Jay's authority, was restricted
to that of demanding the surrender of the western posts, and indemnification
for the cargoes captured in American vessels.
Mr. Washington knows that this was untrue; and knowing this, he
had good reason to himself for refusing to furnish the House of
Representatives with copies of the instructions given to Jay, as
he might suspect, among other things, that he should also be called
upon for copies of instructions given to other Ministers, and that,
in the contradiction of instructions, his want of integrity would
be detected. Mr. Washington may now, perhaps, learn, when it is
too late to be of any use to him, that a man will pass better through
the world with a thousand open errors upon his back than in being
detected in one sly falsehood. When one is detected, a thousand
are suspected.
in a letter to George Washington (30 July 1796) discussing Paine's
service to America, as excerpted from Daniel Edwin Wheeler, ed.,
Life
and Writings of Thomas Paine
• Reason and Ignorance, the opposites
of each other, influence the great bulk of mankind. If either of
these can be rendered sufficiently extensive in a country, the machinery
of government goes easily on. Reason obeys itself; and Ignorance
submits to whatever is dictated to it.
The
Rights of Man: Being An Answer To Mr. Burke's Attack On The
French Revolution, Part the First, Conclusion
• When an objection cannot be made formidable,
there is some policy in trying to make it frightful; and to substitute
the yell and the war-whoop, in the place of reason, argument and
good order.
as quoted by Joseph Lewis in Inspiration
and Wisdom from the Writings of Thomas Paine
• It is always to be taken for granted,
that those who oppose an equality of rights never mean the exclusion
should take place on themselves.
as quoted by Joseph Lewis in Inspiration
and Wisdom from the Writings of Thomas Paine
• When I contemplate the natural dignity
of man; when I feel (for Nature has not been kind enough to me to
blunt my feelings) for the honor and happiness of its character,
I become irritated at the attempt to govern mankind by force and
fraud, as if they were all knaves and fools, and can scarcely avoid
disgust at those who are thus imposed upon.
The
Rights of Man
• I believe in the equality of man;
and I believe that religious duties consist in doing justice, loving
mercy, and endeavoring to make our fellow-creatures happy.
The
Age of Reason
• To argue with a man who has renounced
his reason is like giving medicine to the dead.
The
Crisis
<TOP>
|
| |
• Question
with boldness even the existence of God; because, if there be one,
he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded
fear.
Written in 1787 in a letter to his nephew
• Millions
of innocent men, women, and children, since the introduction of
Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined, and imprisoned;
yet we have not advanced one inch toward uniformity. What has been
the effect of coercion? To make one-half the world fools and the
other half hypocrites. To support roguery and error all over the
earth.
Notes on the State of Virginia, 1781-82.
• What
all agree upon is probably right; what no two agree in most probably
is wrong.
Jefferson's Axiom, in a letter to John Adams, 11 January 1817,
quoted from Lester Cappon, ed. The Adams-Jefferson Letters (1959)
p. 445
• Among
the most inestimable of our blessings is that...of liberty to worship
our Creator in the way we think most agreeable to His will; a liberty
deemed in other countries incompatible with good government and
yet proved by our experience to be its best support.
Reply to Baptist Address, 1807
• From
the dissensions among Sects themselves arise necessarily a right
of choosing and necessity of deliberating to which we will conform.
But if we choose for ourselves, we must allow others to choose also,
and so reciprocally, this establishes religious liberty.
Notes on Religion, 1776.
• The legitimate
powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to
others. But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are
twenty gods, or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my
leg.
Notes on the State of Virginia, 1781-82.
• Subject
opinion to coercion: whom will you make your inquisitors? Fallible
men; men governed by bad passions, by private as well as public
reasons. And why subject it to coercion? To produce uniformity.
But is uniformity of opinion desirable? No more than of face and
stature.
Notes on Virginia, 1782.
• I know
it will give great offense to the clergy, but the advocate of religious
freedom is to expect neither peace nor forgiveness from them.
Written to Levi Lincoln, 1802
• Because religious belief,
or non-belief, is such an important part of every person's life,
freedom of religion affects every individual. State churches that
use government power to support themselves and force their views
on persons of other faiths undermine all our civil rights. Moreover,
state support of the church tends to make the clergy unresponsive
to the people and leads to corruption within religion. Erecting
the "wall of separation between church and state," therefore,
is absolutely essential in a free society.
We have solved ... the great and interesting question whether freedom
of religion is compatible with order in government and obedience
to the laws. And we have experienced the quiet as well as the comfort
which results from leaving every one to profess freely and openly
those principles of religion which are the inductions of his own
reason and the serious convictions of his own inquiries.
to the Virginia Baptists (1808). This is his second use of the
term "wall of separation," here quoting his own use in
the Danbury Baptist letter. This wording was several times upheld
by the Supreme Court as an accurate description of the Establishment
Clause: Reynolds (98 US at 164, 1879); Everson (330 US at 59, 1947);
McCollum (333 US at 232, 1948)
• [N]o man shall be compelled
to frequent or support any religious worship, place, or ministry
whatsoever, nor shall be enforced, restrained, molested, or burthened
in his body or goods, nor shall otherwise suffer, on account of
his religious opinions or belief; but that all men shall be free
to profess, and by argument to maintain, their opinions in matters
of religion, and that the same shall in no wise diminish, enlarge,
or affect their civil capacities.
Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom (1779), quoted from Merrill
D Peterson, ed., Thomas Jefferson: Writings (1984), p. 347
• I am for freedom of religion,
& against all maneuvres to bring about a legal ascendancy of
one sect over another.
letter to Elbridge Gerry, 1799
• I never will, by any
word or act, bow to the shrine of intolerance, or admit a right
of inquiry into the religious opinions of others.
letter to Edward Dowse, April 19, 1803
<TOP>
Click here
for a page of letters and writings by Thomas Jefferson
|
James Madison
|
• During
almost fifteen centuries has the legal establishment of Christianity
been on trial. What has been its fruits? More or less, in all
places, pride and indolence in the clergy; ignorance and servility
in the laity; in both, superstition, bigotry, and persecution.
• Religious
bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every
noble enterprise.
April 1, 1774
<TOP>
|
|

• The being cannot be termed rational
or virtuous, who obeys any authority, but that of reason.
A
Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792), ch. xiii, p. 291,
excerpted from Annie Laurie Gaylor, Women
Without Superstition, p. 17
• How can a rational being be ennobled
by any thing that is not obtained by its own exertions?
A
Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792)
• In fact, it is a farce to call any
being virtuous whose virtues do not result from the exercise of
its own reason.
A
Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792), ch. ii, 89-90,
excerpted from Annie Laurie Gaylor, Women
Without Superstition, p. 20
• In this metropolis a number of lurking
leeches infamously gain subsistence by practicing on the credulity
of women.
"Some Instances of the Folly Which the Ignorance of Women
Generates," in A
Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792), p. 217, excerpted
from Annie Laurie Gaylor, Women
Without Superstition, p. 18
• Slavery to monarchs and ministers,
which the world will be long freeing itself from, and whose deadly
grasp stops the progress of the human mind, is not yet abolished.
A
Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792), ch. ii, 89-90,
quoted from Dr. Mynga Futrell, "The Ladies Clamor for Change"
• What, but the rapacity of the only
men who exercised their reason, the priests, secured such vast
property to the church, when a man gave his perishable substance
to save himself from the dark torments of purgatory; and found
it more convenient to indulge his depraved appetites, and pay
an exorbitant price for absolution, than listen to the suggestions
of reason, and work out his own salvation: in a word, was not
the separation of religion from morality the work of the priests...?
A
Vindication of the Rights of Men (1790), p. 40, excerpted
from Annie Laurie Gaylor, Women
Without Superstition, p. 21
• Independence I have long considered
as the grand blessing of life, the basis of every virtue; and
independence I will ever secure by contracting my wants, though
I were to live on a barren heath
A
Vindication of the Rights of Woman, "Dedication,"
(1792)
• Nothing contributes so much to tranquilize
the mind as a steady purpose -- a point on which the soul may
fix its intellectual eye.
quoted from Words
of Women Quotations for Success (1997)
• No man chooses evil because it is
evil; he only mistakes it for happiness, the good he seeks.
• Probably the prevailing opinion,
that woman was created for man, may have taken its rise from Moses's
poetical story; yet, as very few, it is presumed, who have bestowed
any serious thought on the subject, ever supposed that Eve was,
literally speaking one of Adam's ribs, the deduction must be allowed
to fall to the ground; or, only so far admitted as it proves that,
from the remotest antiquity, found it convenient to exert his
strength to subjugate his companion, and his invention to shew
that she ought to have her neck bent under the yoke, because the
whole creation was only created for his convenience or pleasure.
A
Vindication of the Rights of Men (1790), p. 40, excerpted
from Annie Laurie Gaylor, Women
Without Superstition, p. 20-21
• Men neglect the duties incumbent
on man, yet are treated like demi-gods; religion is also separated
from morality by a ceremonial veil, yet men wonder that the world
is almost, literally speaking, a den of sharpers or oppressors.
A
Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792), ch. ii, p. 107,
excerpted from Annie Laurie Gaylor, Women
Without Superstition, p. 22
• Let not men then in the pride of
power, use the same arguments that tyrannic kings and venal ministers
have used, and fallaciously assert that women ought to be subjected
because she has always been so.... It is time to effect a revolution
in female manners -- time to restore to them their lost dignity....
It is time to separate unchangeable morals from local manners.
A
Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792)
• I love my man as my fellow; but
his scepter, real, or usurped, extends not to me, unless the reason
of an individual demands my homage; and even then the submission
is to reason, and not to man.
A
Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792), ch. ii, p. 107,
excerpted from Annie Laurie Gaylor, Women
Without Superstition, p. 21
• Man preys on man; and you mourn
for the idle tapestry that decorated a gothic pillar, and the
dronish bell that summoned the fat priest to prayer. You mourn
for the empty pageant of a name, when slavery flaps her wing,
... Why is our fancy to be appalled by terrific perspectives of
a hell beyond the grave? -- Hell stalks abroad; -- the lash resounds
on the slave's naked sides; and the sick wretch, who can no longer
earn the sour bread of unremitting labour, steals to a ditch to
bid the world a long good night.
A
Vindication of the Rights of Men (1790), p. 62, excerpted
from Annie Laurie Gaylor, Women
Without Superstition, p. 22
• Women are systematically degraded
by receiving the trivial attentions which men think it manly to
pay to the sex, when, in fact, men are insultingly supporting
their own superiority.
quoted from Words
of Women Quotations for Success (1997)
• Taught from infancy that beauty
is woman's sceptre, the mind shapes itself to the body, and roaming
round its gilt cage, only seeks to adorn its prison.
A
Vindication of the Rights of Woman ch. iii (1792)
• Strengthen the female mind by enlarging
it, and there will be an end to blind obedience.
<TOP>
|
| |
• Probably
all organic beings which have ever lived on this earth have descended
from some one primordial form, into which life was first breathed.
There is grandeur in this view of life that, whilst this planet
has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from
so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful
have been, and are being evolved.
The
Origin of Species
• It appears
to me (whether rightly or wrongly) that direct arguments against
christianity and theism produce hardly any effect on the public;
and freedom of thought is best promoted by the gradual illumination
of men's minds which follows from the advance of science.
• When
I view all beings not as special creations, but as the lineal descendants
of some few beings which lived long before the first bed of the
Cambrian system was deposited, they seem to me to become ennobled.
The
Origin of Species
• What a
book a Devil's Chaplain might write on the clumsy, wasteful, blundering
low and horribly cruel works of nature.
• When
it was first said that the sun stood still and world turned round,
the common sense of mankind declared the doctrine false; but the
old saying of Vox populi, vox Dei [the voice of the people is the
voice of God], as every philosopher knows, cannot be trusted in
science.
Quoted from Stephen Jay Gould, The
Structure of Evolutionary Theory (2002), chapter 1, "Defining
and Revising the Structure of Evolutionary Theory," p. 1 (the
bracketed translation is Gould's)
• I have at least, as I hope, done good
service in aiding to overthrow the dogma of separate creations.
Descent
of Man
• Ignorance more frequently begets confidence
than does knowledge: it is those who know little, and not those
who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem
will never be solved by science.
Introduction to The Descent of Man
• False
facts are highly injurious to the progress of science, for they
often endure long; but false views, if supported by some evidence,
do little harm, for everyone takes a salutory pleasure in proving
their falseness; and when this is done, one path toward errors is
closed and the road to truth is often at the same time opened.
Descent
of Man
• How so many absurd rules of conduct,
as well as so many absurd religious beliefs, have originated, we
do not know; nor how it is that they have become, in all quarters
of the world, so deeply impressed on the minds of men; but it is
worthy of remark that a belief constantly inculcated during the
early years of life, while the brain is impressionable, appears
to acquire almost the nature of an instinct; and the very essence
of an instinct is that it is followed independently of reason.
Descent
of Man p. 122
• I am aware that the assumed instinctive
belief in God has been used by many persons as an argument for his
existence. The idea of a universal and beneficent Creator does not
seem to arise in the mind of man, until he has been elevated by
long-continued culture.
Descent
of Man p. 612
• I am aware that the conclusions arrived
at in this work will be denounced by some as highly irreligious;
but he who denounces them is bound to show why it is more irreligious
to explain the origin of man as a distinct species by descent from
some lower from, through the laws of variation and natural selection,
than to explain the birth of the individual through the laws of
ordinary reproduction. The birth both of the species and of the
individual are equally parts of that grand sequence of events, which
our minds refuse to accept as the result of blind chance.
Descent
of Man p. 613
• But I own that I cannot see as plainly
as others do, and I should wish to do, evidence of design and beneficence
on all sides of us. There seems to me too much misery in the world.
I cannot persuade myself that a beneficent and omnipotent God would
have designedly created that a cat should play with mice.
• The mystery of the beginning of all things is insoluble
by us, and I for one must be content to remain an agnostic.
Life
and Letters, cited in Peter's
Quotations, by Lawrence J Peter (1977), p. 45, quoted from James
A Haught, "Breaking the Last Taboo" (1996)
<TOP>
|
|
• The memory of my own suffering has
prevented me from ever shadowing one young soul with the superstitions
of the Christian religion.
Eight Years and More (1898), p. 26
• I can truly say that all the cares
and anxieties, the trials and disappointments of my whole life,
are light, when balanced with my sufferings in childhood and youth
from the theological dogmas which I sincerely believed, and the
gloom connected with everything associated with the name of religion.
quoted from Thomas S Vernon, Great
Infidels, quoted from James A Haught, ed., 2000
Years of Disbelief
• The Bible and the Church have been
the greatest stumbling blocks in the way of women's emancipation.
quoted from Free Thought Magazine (Sept. 1896)
• I know of no other book that so fully
teaches the subjection and degradation of women.
Eight Years and More (1898), p. 395
• Among the clergy we find our most
violent enemies, those most opposed to any change in woman's position.
from Rufus K Noyes, Views of Religion, quoted from James A Haught,
ed., 2000
Years of Disbelief
• The whole tone of Church teaching
in regard to woman is, to the last degree, contemptuous and degrading.
Free Thought magazine (November, 1896), quoted from Freedom
From Religion Foundation, "What They Said About Religion"
(Nontract #4)
• All the men of the Old Testament were
polygamists, and Christ and Paul, the central figures of the New
Testament, were celibates, and condemned marriage by both precept
and example.
from Ira D Cardiff, What Great Men Think of Religion, quoted
from James A Haught, ed., 2000
Years of Disbelief
• The Pentateuch makes woman a mere
afterthought in creation; the author of sin; cursed in her maternity;
a subject in marriage; and claims divine authority for this fourfold
bondage, this wholesale desecration of the mothers of the race.
While some admit that this invidious language of the Old Testament
is disparaging to woman, they claim that the New Testament honors
her. But the letters of the apostles to the churches, giving directions
for the discipline of women, are equally invidious, as the following
texts prove:
"Wives, obey your husbands. If you would know anything, ask
your husbands at home. Let your women keep silence in the churches,
with their heads covered. Let not your women usurp authority over
the man, for as Christ is the head of the church so is the man the
head of the woman. Man was prior in creation, the woman was of the
man, therefore shall she be in subjection to him."
No symbols or metaphors can twist honor or dignity out of such sentiments.
Here, in plain English, woman's position is as degraded as in the
Old Testament.
from the pamphlet "Bible and Church Degrade Woman,"
Free Thought Magazine (1896), quoted from Annie Laurie Gaylor, Women
Without Superstition, pp. 124-5
• Well, another female child is born
into the world! Last Sunday afternoon, Harriot Eaton Stanton --
oh! the little heretic thus to desecrate that holy holiday -- opened
her soft blue eyes on this mundane sphere.
in "an impish letter of joy to Susan B Anthony on the arrival
of her 'little heretic,' her second and last daughter, Harriot"
(January 24, 1856), quoted from and citation note by Annie Laurie
Gaylor, Women
Without Superstition, p. 106
• Out of the doctrine of original sin
grew the crimes and miseries of asceticism, celibacy and witchcraft;
woman becoming the helpless victim of all these delusions.
from Charles Q Bufe, ed., The
Heretic's Handbook of Quotations: Cutting Comments on Burning Issues,
quoted from James A Haught, ed., 2000
Years of Disbelief
• Men can never understand the fear
of everlasting punishment that fills the souls of women and children.
The orthodox religion, as drawn from the Bible and expounded by
the church, is enough to drive the most imaginative and sensitive
natures to despair and death.
from the pamphlet "Bible and Church Degrade Woman,"
Free Thought Magazine (1896), quoted from Annie Laurie Gaylor, Women
Without Superstition, p. 125
• How can any woman believe that a loving
and merciful God would, in one breath, command Eve to multiply and
replenish the earth, and in the next, pronounce a curse upon her
maternity? I do not believe that God inspired the Mosaic code, or
gave out the laws about women which he is accused of doing.
from Ira D Cardiff, What Great Men Think of Religion, quoted
from James A Haught, ed., 2000
Years of Disbelief
• When women understand that governments
and religions are human inventions; that bibles, prayer-books, catechisms,
and encyclical letters are all emanations from the brain of man,
they will no longer be oppressed by the injunctions that come to
them with the divine authority of "thus saith the Lord."
quoted from Thomas S Vernon, Great
Infidels, quoted from James A Haught, ed., 2000
Years of Disbelief
• We found nothing grand in the history
of the Jews nor in the morals inculcated in the Pentateuch.... I
know of no other books that so fully teach the subjection and degradation
of woman.
Eight Years and More, ch. 24 (1898), p. 395
• The religious superstitions of women
perpetuate their bondage more than all other adverse influences.
from Laird Wilcox and John George, eds., Be
Reasonable: Selected Quotations for Inquiring Minds, quoted
from James A Haught, ed., 2000
Years of Disbelief
• The happiest people I have known have
been those who gave themselves no concern about their own souls,
but did their uttermost to mitigate the miseries of others.
quoted from Dr. Mynga Futrell, "The Ladies Clamor for Change"
• I often saw weary little women coming
to the table after most exhausting labors, and large, bumptious
husbands spreading out their hands and thanking the Lord for the
meals that the dear women had prepared, as if the whole came down
like manna from heaven. So I preached a sermon in the blessing I
gave. You will notice that it has three heresies in it: "Heavenly
Father and Mother, make us thankful for all the blessings of this
life, and make us ever mindful of the patient hands that oft in
weariness spread our tables and prepare our daily food. For humanity's
sake, Amen."
upon overcoming her discomfort over being asked to say "grace,"
Stanton began using the opportunity to preach equality, while traveling
under frontier conditions as a suffrage organizer and on the Lyceum
circuit, lecturing for as many as five consecutive months a year
for more than a decade, in Alma
Lutz, Created Equal (1940), p. 201, quoted from and citation
notes by Annie Laurie Gaylor, Women
Without Superstition, p. 106
• I have been into many of the ancient
cathedrals -- grand, wonderful, mysterious. But I always leave them
with a feeling of indignation because of the generations of human
beings who have struggled in poverty to build these altars to an
unknown god.
from her diary, quoted from James A Haught, ed., 2000
Years of Disbelief
• For years many a thinking people have
had gloomy forebodings as to the result of the immense power of
the church in our political affairs.... And the first step in the
disestablishment of the church & of all churches is the taxation
of church property. The government has no right to tax infidels
for everything that takes the name of religion. For every dollar
of church property untaxed, all other properties must be taxed one
dollar more, and thus the poor man's home bears the burden of maintaining
costly edifices from which he & his family are as effectively
excluded -- as though a policeman stood to bar their entrance, and
in smaller towns all sects are building, building, building, not
a little town in the western prairies but has its three & four
churches & this immense accumulation of wealth is all exempt
from taxation. In the new world as well as the old these rich ecclesiastical
corporations are a heavy load on the shoulders of the people, for
what wealth escapes, the laboring masses are compelled to meet.
If all the church property in this country were taxed, in the same
ratio poor widows are to day, we could soon roll off the national
debt....
The clergy of all sects are universally opposed to free thought
& free speech, & if they had the power even in our republic
to day would crush any man who dared to question the popular religion.
unidentified lecture fragment about taxation of church property
(1877?), quoted from Annie Laurie Gaylor, Women
Without Superstition, pp. 141-2
• I found in this new friend a woman
emancipated from all faith in manmade creeds, from all fear of his
denunciations. Nothing was too sacred for her to question, as to
its rightfulness in principle and practice.... It seemed to me like
meeting a being from some larger planet, to find a woman who dared
to question the opinions of Popes, Kings, Synods, Parliaments, with
the same freedom that she would criticize an editorial in the London
Times, recognizing no higher authority than the judgment of a pure-minded
educated woman. When I first heard from the lips of Lucretia Mott
that I had the same right to think for myself that Luther, Calvin,
and John Knox had, and the same right to be guided by my own convictions,
and would no doubt live a higher, happier life than if guided by
theirs, it was like suddenly coming into the rays of the noon-day
sun, after wandering with a rushlight in the caves the earth.
"I Had the Same Right to Think," quoted from The
History of Woman Suffrage, vol I, p. 422
• I have endeavoured to dissipate these
religious superstitions from the minds of women, and base their
faith on science and reason, where I found for myself at last that
peace and comfort I could never find in the Bible and the church....
The less they believe, the better for their own happiness and development....
For fifty years the women of this nation have tried to dam up this
deadly stream that poisons all their lives, but thus far they have
lacked the insight or courage to follow it back to its source and
there strike the blow at the fountain of all tyranny, religious
superstition, priestly power, and the canon law.
"The Degraded Status of Woman in the Bible" (1896),
quoted from Annie Laurie Gaylor, Women
Without Superstition, p. 103
• Women are afraid. It is unpopular
to question the bible. They are creatures of tradition. They fear
to question their position in the testament, as they feared to advocate
suffrage fifty years ago. Now they are quarreling as to which were
among the first to advocate it.
You see they are not used to abuse as I am. In Albany, fifty years
ago, when I went before the legislature to plead for a married woman's
right to her own property, the women whom I met in society crossed
the street rather than speak to me.
Interview, Chicago Record (June 29, 1897), quoted from Annie
Laurie Gaylor, Women
Without Superstition, p. 105
• These teachings in regard to woman
so faithfully reflect the provisions of the canon law that it is
fair to infer that their inspiration came from the same source,
written by men, translated by men, revised by men. If the Bible
is to be placed in the hands of our children, read in our schools,
taught in our theological seminaries, proclaimed as God’s
law in our temples of worship, let us by all means call a council
of women in New York, and give it one more revision from the woman’s
standpoint.
quoted from Dr. Mynga Futrell, "The Ladies Clamor for Change"
• It is through the perversion of the
religious element in woman, playing upon her hopes and fears of
the future, holding this life with all its high duties in abeyance
to that which is to come, that she and the children she has trained
have been so completely subjugated by priestcraft and superstition.
quoted from Dr. Mynga Futrell, "The Ladies Clamor for Change"
• As women are taking an active part
in pressing on the consideration of Congress many narrow sectarian
measures, such as more rigid Sunday laws, the stopping of travel,
the distribution of the mail on that day, and the introduction of
the name of God into the Constitution; and as this action on the
part of some women is used as an argument for the disfranchisement
of all, I hope this convention will declare that the Woman Suffrage
Association is opposed to all union of Church and State, and pledges
itself as far as possible to maintain the secular nature of our
Government.
warning suffragists not to capitalize on Frances Willard's suffrage
help through the Women's Christian Temperance Union, at her opening
speech at the National American Woman Suffrage Association convention
of 1890, from The
History of Woman Suffrage, vol. iv, p. 166, quoted from and
citation notes by Annie Laurie Gaylor, Women
Without Superstition, p. 110
• The Bible teaches that woman brought
sin and death into the world, that she precipitated the fall of
the race, that she was arraigned before the judgment seat of Heaven,
tried, condemned and sentenced. Marriage for her was to be a condition
of bondage, maternity a period of suffering and anguish, and in
silence and subjection, she was to play the role of a dependent
on man's bounty for all her material wants, and for all the information
she might desire.... Here is the Bible position of woman briefly
summed up.
• Whatever oppressions man has suffered, they have invariably
fallen more heavily on woman. Whatever new liberties advancing civilization
has brought to man, ever the smallest measure has been accorded
to woman, as a result of church teaching. The effect of this is
seen in every department of life.
quoted from Dr. Mynga Futrell, "The Ladies Clamor for Change"
• One remarkable fact stands out in
the history of witchcraft; and that is, its victims were chiefly
women. Scarce one wizard to a hundred witches was ever burned or
tortured.
"The Christian Church and Woman," from the Index,
Boston, ca. 1888. This is a version of "Woman's Position in
the Christian Church," a sermon originally delivered in Moncure
D Conway's Pulpit, South Place Chapel, London, September 1882. A
longer version appeared in The Boston Investigator, May 18, 1901.
A slightly shorter version was included in the pamphlet "Bible
and Church Degrade Woman," quoted from and citation notes by
Annie Laurie Gaylor, Women
Without Superstition, p. 116
• All through the centuries, scholars
and scientists have been imprisoned, tortured and burned alive for
some discovery which seemed to conflict with a petty text of Scripture.
Surely the immutable laws of the universe can teach more impressive
and exalted lessons than the holy books of all the religions on
earth.
quoted from Thomas S Vernon, Great
Infidels, quoted from James A Haught, ed., 2000
Years of Disbelief
• I can say that the happiest period
of my life has been since I emerged from the shadows and superstitions
of the old theologies, relieved from all gloomy apprehensions of
the future, satisfied that as my labors and capacities were limited
to this sphere of action, I was responsible for nothing beyond my
horizon, as I could neither understand nor change the condition
of the unknown world. Giving ourselves, then, no trouble about the
future, let us make the most of the present, and fill up our lives
with earnest work here.
from "The Pleasures of Age," published by The Boston
Investigator (February 2, 1901), quoted from Annie Laurie Gaylor,
Women
Without Superstition, p. 111
• How anyone, in view of the protracted
sufferings of the race, can invest the laws of the universe with
a tender loving fatherly intelligence, watching, guiding and protecting
humanity, is to me amazing.
letter to Henry Stanton (August 2, 1880), quoted from from James
A Haught, ed., 2000
Years of Disbelief
<TOP>
|
|

• To no form of religion
is woman indebted for one impulse of freedom.
• The religious persecution of the ages has been done under
what was claimed to be the command of God.
quoted from James A Haught, ed., 2000
Years of Disbelief
• I distrust those people who know so
well what God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides
with their own desires.
• I tell them I have worked 40 years to make the WS platform
broad enough for Atheists and Agnostics to stand upon, and now if
need be I will fight the next 40 to keep it Catholic enough to permit
the straightest Orthodox religionist to speak or pray and count
her beads upon.
• What you should say to outsiders is that a Christian has
neither more nor less rights in our Association than an atheist.
When our platform becomes too narrow for people of all creeds and
of no creeds, I myself shall not stand upon it.
Susan B Anthony: A Biography, by Kathleen Barry, New York University
Press, 1988, p.310
<TOP>
|
|

• Had not man been trained
by his religion into a belief that woman was created for him,
had not the church for 1,800 and more years preached woman’s
moral debasement, the long course of legislation for them as slaves
would never have taken place, nor the obstacles in way of change
been so numerous and so persistent.
Woman,
Church, and State
• The injustice of man towards woman
under the laws of both Church and State engrafted upon society,
have resulted in many evils unsuspected by the world, which if known
would strike it with amazement and terror.
• In the name of religion, the worst
crimes against humanity have ever been perpetrated.
• Woman desires freedom in order to
become what she has the innate power of becoming. She is a living
growing organism as much as is a tree, and like that tree, she needs
room and freedom. A tree planted close beside a stone wall, cannot
grow upon the side next to the wall. Sunshine and air may meet it
upon the opposite side, its branches may put forth in one direction,
but the stone wall prevents its becoming a tree of symmetrical proportions.
• People demand the overthrow of those
restrictions which press the hardest upon them.
• In each of these three institutions
every human being has an interest, and a natural right to assist
in framing. Those three institutions, family, society, and government
are his only three sources of life, of happiness, and of liberty
in this world.
• We may look forward with an eye of
prescience and in the remote future see a time when human governments
shall have come to an end, but our duty lies not in the contemplation
of that happy period. We belong to a period of the world's struggle;
our opportunities and our duties lie with the world as we find it,
and women as human beings have inherent rights to share in all the
duties of the world, in all methods of the world's progress, because
in these duties, in these methods, lie developing powers.
• Woman is a glorious possibility, the
youngest-born of God's creatures, the Benjamin of life, the future
of the world is hers.
Autograph Book, 21 February 1882
• The world is now full of subjects
to compel great thoughts. Woman's experiences broaden, deepen, embolden
her. She sees life as never before:- as never before she dares to
be herself. The progress of life is a growth headward; as the spirit
brain increases, morality increases and humanity becomes more free.
True civilization is a recognition of the rights of others at every
point of contact, and when this takes place the world will step
out of the darkness of heathendom into a full light of a religious
and political civilization grander than any of which it has yet
dreamed.
"The Foundation of Sovereignty," The Woman's
Tribune. April 1887
• While so much is said of the inferior
intellect of woman, it is by a strange absurdity conceded that very
many eminent men owe their station in life to their mothers.
• To those who fancy we are near the
end of the battle or that the reformer's path is strewn with roses,
we may say them nay. The thick of the fight has just begun; the
hottest part of the warfare is yet to come, and those who enter
it must be willing to give up father, mother and comforts for its
sake. Neither shall we who carry on the fight, reap the great reward.
We are battling for the good of those who shall come after us; they,
not ourselves, shall enter into the harvest.
Final Editorial, National Citizen and Ballot Box, 1881.
• The policy of the church from the
moment of her existence has been universal dominion over the lives,
property, and thought of mankind. The threads of life mingle like
broth in the Witches Cauldron, from many a diverse source.
• Once possessor of a name but now by
virtue of a few words, merely an auxiliary to her reverend husband
• Money causes people to be interested
in each other
• He took me to one house, a ministers,
I didn't like things a bit. They felt grand, kept three servants,
black ones, too, and had a great dinner after meeting. Those colored
folks had staid home and cooked it. I didn't think it was right.
They had carpets you couldn't hear your feet on, and pictures that
looked like birds sitting in them. It was all very grand and fine
but I didn't feel at home. He had borrowed money of Mr. Sniffles
and so he wanted to use him well. He never paid it though. I suppose
there are good folks in New York but I'd rather be home with ma.
• She had lived and breathed and thought
and acted as directed by father and mother all these years, and
now her father was dead and she was left under sole charge and direction
of her mother. Her mother, did I say? A selfish tyrant, rather,
to whom she was bound by those ties most binding to people trained
as this girl had been. Affection, obedience, control of her will,
all in the name of duty and religion.
• Hannah was old, that kind of age that
depends not upon years but causes people to lose all interest in
life. Like a parasite her mother drew all the juices of youth and
happiness from her daughter. If God's justice and mercy extends
not farther across the border than theologians teach, how worse
than wretched the fate of myriad millions who on earth longed for
simple happiness, happiness so simple that it should be common to
all as the air they breathe.
• (Catherine the Second) I propose to
glance for a brief hour, at the history of one of the most remarkable
women that ever lived. The events of a life always possess a peculiar
fascination. The hopes, the fears, the joys, the sorrows, the loves
and hatreds of the most obscure person, when spread before us, at
once enlist our attention, and have for us an absorbing interest,
for here we seek new revelations of the mysteries of life; and an
acquaintance with the condition and surroundings of the commonest
(one) person, may give us a knowledge of all that person's country
was at the time they lived.
• The events of a life always possess
a peculiar fascination. The hopes and fears, the joys and sorrows,
the loves and hatreds, and ambitions, of the most obscure person,
when open before us, at once enlist our attention, and have (possess)
for us an absorbing interest, for here we seek new revelations of
the mysteries of life; and a knowledge of the conditions and surroundings,
of one person may give to us a perception of all that person's country
was at the time they lived.
• It is no less true mentally and physically,
than morally, that a parent's sins are visited upon their children
to the third and fourth generation. Every man lives again in the
race. His successors are but modified editions of himself. To judge
how much our acts will influence the future, we must look back and
see what influence the past had had upon us. We are measurably what
our fathers and mothers were, our children will measurably be what
we have been.
• (death:) Even the cricket was still.
The frosts of approaching winter had hushed his song. He was dead,
and all nature, too, seemed dying; but faith said there is a summer
beyond. These sleep now, but by and by they will awaken again. I
looked at the mounds about me and faith again whispered, "These
are not dead, they but sleep! There is a summer beyond where friends
meet again."
"Letter from Mrs. Gage", Daily Standard, 18 Nov. 1871
• (revivals:) American revivals, as
a noticeable fact, occur in the winter months, when people are less
busy with pressing work for the body, and are upon the lookout for
excitement. Revivals have in them that element of emotional exaltation
so unconsciously sought by this age and this people.
"Washington Gossip," NY Evening Post, 12 Feb. 1876
• Sympathetic contagion, generally connected
with some religious feeling, never has force where the intellect
is scientifically and philosophically cultivated, and active. It
belongs to an age, or a phase of ignorance and religious superstition.
The crusades dragged thousands from home to engage in a war for
wresting the Holy Sepulchre from the Turks. For three centuries,
imagining they were doing God's service, men were afflicted with
that superstitious madness till even children entered it, and thousands
of boys and girls from ten to fourteen years of age, led by one
of their own companions, marched despite parents and magistrates,
on this same mad errand. Moral contagion as a law of life, has never
yet received its due consideration. From such instances as have
been mentioned, one can well see how Bishop Butler came to suggest
his famous idea of the insanity of whole communities. He deemed
many incidents of history unexplainable on any other grounds. Delusions
seem to be capable of communicating themselves and fastening with
a very tenacious hold upon the imagination. During the witchcraft
delusion, many persons voluntarily accused themselves of its practice.
At the time of the Tarantula mania, which raged in the south of
Europe during the fifteenth century, whole companies of the afflicted,
hand in hand, sang and danced themselves voluntarily into the sea
and were drowned. Suicide, crime, and even accidents put on a contagious
form. No stranger fact exists in the religious history of the world,
than the rise and spread of the Mormon delusion in this country.
The one man power, contrary to the instincts of our government,
swelling in the space of thirty years from nothing to one hundred
thousand; the deeper depths of woman's degradation, hand in hand,
with this autocracy, furnish a problem whose cause is for the philosophers
to elucidate.
"The Woman's Anti-Whiskey Crusade," The Golden Age,
21 March 1874
<TOP> |
| |
|
• Some heathens whose Idol was greatly
weatherworn threw it into a river, and erecting a new one, engaged
in public worship at its base.
"What is this all about?" inquired the New Idol.
"Father of Joy and Gore," said the High Priest, "be
patient and I will instruct you in the doctrines and rites of our
holy religion."
A year later, after a course of study in theology, the Idol asked
to be thrown into the river, declaring himself an atheist.
"Do not let that trouble you," said the High Priest --
"so am I"
"Two Sceptics," Fantastic Fables
• Religions
are conclusions for which the facts of nature supply no major premises.
Collected Works (1912)
• Nothing
is more logical than persecution. Religious tolerance is a kind
of infidelity.
Collected Works (1912), quoted from James A Haught, ed., 2000
Years of Disbelief
• Theology
is a thing of unreason altogether, an edifice of assumption and
dreams, a superstructure without a substructure.
Collected Works (1912), quoted from James A Haught, ed., 2000
Years of Disbelief
• Camels
and Christians receive their burdens kneeling.
quoted from James A Haught, ed., 2000
Years of Disbelief
• A person who doubts himself is like
a man who would enlist in the ranks of his enemies and bear arms
agains himself. He makes his failure certain by himself being the
first person to be convinced of it.
• A total abstainer is one who abstains from everything but
abstention, and especially from inactivity in the affairs of others.
• Ability is commonly found to consist mainly in a high degree
of solemnity.
Aborigines, n.: Persons of little worth found cumbering the soil
of a newly discovered country. They soon cease to cumber; they fertilize.
• Absence blots people out. We really have no absent friends.
• Abstainer: a weak person who yields to the temptation of
denying himself a pleasure.
• Absurdity, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent
with one's own opinion.
• Academe, n.: An ancient school where morality and philosophy
were taught. Academy, n.: A modern school where football is taught.
• Acquaintance. A person whom we know well enough to borrow
from, but not well enough to lend to.
• Admiration, n. Our polite recognition of another's resemblance
to ourselves.
• All are lunatics, but he who can analyze his delusions is
called a philosopher.
• Ambidextrous, adj.: Able to pick with equal skill a right-hand
pocket or a left.
• An egotist is a person of low taste-more interested in himself
than in me.
• Anoint, v.: To grease a king or other great functionary
already sufficiently slippery.
• Ardor, n. The quality that distinguishes love without knowledge.
• Bacchus, n.: A convenient deity invented by the ancients
as an excuse for getting drunk.
• Barometer, n.: An ingenious instrument which indicates what
kind of weather we are having.
• Battle, n., A method of untying with the teeth a political
knot that would not yield to the tongue.
• Beauty, n: the power by which a woman charms a lover and
terrifies a husband.
• Being is desirable because it is identical with Beauty,
and Beauty is loved because it is Being. We ourselves possess Beauty
when we are true to our own being; ugliness is in going over to
another order; knowing ourselves, we are beautiful; in self-ignorance,
we are ugly.
• Belladonna, n.: In Italian a beautiful lady; in English
a deadly poison. A striking example of the essential identity of
the two tongues.
• Bigot: One who is obstinately and zealously attached to
an opinion that you do not entertain.
• Bore, n. A person who talks when you wish him to listen.
• Brain: an apparatus with which we think we think.
• Bride: A woman with a fine prospect of happiness behind
her.
• Cabbage: a familiar kitchen-garden vegetable about as large
and wise as a man's head.
• Calamities are of two kinds: misfortunes to ourselves, and
good fortune to others.
• Childhood: the period of human life intermediate between
the idiocy of infancy and the folly of youth - two removes from
the sin of manhood and three from the remorse of age.
• Clairvoyant, n.: A person, commonly a woman, who has the
power of seeing that which is invisible to her patron - namely,
that he is a blockhead.
• Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum - I think that I think, therefore
I think that I am.
• Confidante. One entrusted by A with the secrets of B confided
to herself by C.
• Conservative, n: A statesman who is enamored of existing
evils, as distinguished from the Liberal who wishes to replace them
with others.
• Consult: To seek approval for a course of action already
decided upon
• Corporation: An ingenious device for obtaining profit without
individual responsibility.
• Coward: One who, in a perilous emergency, thinks with his
legs.
• Cynic, n: a blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as
they are, not as they ought to be.
• Dawn: When men of reason go to bed.
• Day, n. A period of twenty-four hours, mostly misspent.
• Death is not the end. There remains the litigation over
the estate.
• Debt, n. An ingenious substitute for the chain and whip
of the slavedriver.
• Deliberation, n.: The act of examining one's bread to determine
which side it is buttered on.
• Destiny: A tyrant's authority for crime and a fool's excuse
for failure.
• Doubt begins only at the last frontiers of what is possible.
• Doubt, indulged and cherished, is in danger of becoming
denial; but if honest, and bent on thorough investigation, it may
soon lead to full establishment of the truth.
• Doubt is the father of invention.
• Edible, adj.: Good to eat, and wholesome to digest, as a
worm to a toad, a toad to a snake, a snake to a pig, a pig to a
man, and a man to a worm.
• Education, n.: That which discloses the wise and disguises
from the foolish their lack of understanding.
• Egotism, n: Doing the New York Times crossword puzzle with
a pen.
• Egotist: a person more interested in himself than in me.
• Egotist: A person of low taste, more interested in himself
than in me.
• Experience is a revelation in the light of which we renounce
our errors of youth for those of age.
• Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who
speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel.
• Famous, adj.: Conspicuously miserable.
• Fork: An instrument used chiefly for the purpose of putting
dead animals into the mouth.
• Future. That period of time in which our affairs prosper,
our friends are true and our happinesss is assured.
• Genealogy, n. An account of one's descent from a man who
did not particularly care to trace his own.
• Happiness: an agreeable sensation arising from contemplating
the misery of another.
• History is an account, mostly false, of events, mostly unimportant,
which are brought about by rulers, mostly knaves, and soldiers,
mostly fools.
• Honorable, adj.: Afflicted with an impediment in one's reach.
In legislative bodies, it is customary to mention all members as
honorable; as, "the honorable gentleman is a scurvy cur."
• I believe we shall come to care about people less and less.
The more people one knows the easier it becomes to replace them.
It's one of the curses of London.
• I never said all Democrats were saloonkeepers. What I said
was that all saloonkeepers are Democrats.
• Immortality: A toy which people cry for, And on their knees
apply for, Dispute, contend and lie for, And if allowed Would be
right proud Eternally to die for.
• In each human heart are a tiger, a pig, an ass and a nightingale.
Diversity of character is due to their unequal activity.
• In our civilization, and under our republican form of government,
intelligence is so highly honored that it is rewarded by exemption
from the cares of office.
• Inventor: A person who makes an ingenious arrangement of
wheels, levers and springs, and believes it civilization.
• It is evident that skepticism, while it makes no actual
change in man, always makes him feel better.
• Land: A part of the earth's surface, considered as property.
The theory that land is property subject to private ownership and
control is the foundation of modern society, and is eminently worthy
of the superstructure.
• Lawsuit: A machine which you go into as a pig and come out
of as a sausage.
• Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious.
• Liberty: One of Imagination's most precious possessions.
• Litigation: A machine which you go into as a pig and come
out of as a sausage.
• Logic: The art of thinking and reasoning in strict accordance
with the limitations and incapacities of the human misunderstanding.
• Love: A temporary insanity curable by marriage.
• Mad, adj. Affected with a high degree of intellectual independence.
• Mammon, n.: The god of the world's leading religion.
• Marriage, n: the state or condition of a community consisting
of a master, a mistress, and two slaves, making in all, two.
• Mayonnaise: One of the sauces which serve the French in
place of a state religion.
• Meekness: Uncommon patience in planning a revenge that is
worth while.
• Men become civilized, not in proportion to their willingness
to believe, but in proportion to their readiness to doubt.
• Ocean: A body of water occupying about two-thirds of a world
made for man - who has no gills.
• Optimism: The doctrine that everything is beautiful, including
what is ugly, everything good, especially the bad, and everything
right that is wrong... It is hereditary, but fortunately not contagious.
• Painting, n.: The art of protecting flat surfaces from the
weather, and exposing them to the critic.
• Patience, n. A minor form of dispair, disguised as a virtue.
• Perseverance - a lowly virtue whereby mediocrity achieves
an inglorious success.
• Philosophy: A route of many roads leading from nowhere to
nothing.
• Photograph: a picture painted by the sun without instruction
in art.
• Politeness, n: The most acceptable hypocrisy.
• Politics: A strife of interests masquerading as a contest
of principles. The conduct of public affairs for private advantage.
• Positive, adj.: Mistaken at the top of one's voice.
• Pray: To ask the laws of the universe to be annulled on
behalf of a single petitioner confessedly unworthy.
• Pray, v.: To ask that the laws of the universe be annulled
in behalf of a single petitioner confessedly unworthy.
• Prescription: A physician's guess at what will best prolong
the situation with least harm to the patient.
• Quotation, n: The act of repeating erroneously the words
of another.
• Religion. A daughter of Hope and Fear, explaining to Ignorance
the nature of the Unknowable.
• Revolution, n. In politics, an abrupt change in the form
of misgovernment.
• Saint: A dead sinner revised and edited.
• Speak when you are angry and you will make the best speech
you will ever regret.
• Spring beckons! All things to the call respond; the trees
are leaving and cashiers abscond.
• Success is the one unpardonable sin against our fellows.
• Suffrage, noun. Expression of opinion by means of a ballot.
The right of suffrage (which is held to be both a privilege and
a duty) means, as commonly interpreted, the right to vote for the
man of another man's choice, and is highly prized.
• Sweater, n.: garment worn by child when its mother is feeling
chilly.
• Telephone, n. An invention of the devil which abrogates
some of the advantages of making a disagreeable person keep his
distance.
• The best thing to do with the best things in life is to
give them up.
• The covers of this book are too far apart.
• The gambling known as business looks with austere disfavor
upon the business known as gambling.
• The hardest tumble a man can make is to fall over his own
bluff.
• The small part of ignorance that we arrange and classify
we give the name of knowledge.
• There are four kinds of Homicide: felonious, excusable,
justifiable, and praiseworthy.
• To be positive is to be mistaken at the top of one's voice.
• Vote: the instrument and symbol of a freeman's power to
make a fool of himself and a wreck of his country.
• War is God's way of teaching Americans geography.
• We know what happens to people who stay in the middle of
the road. They get run over.
• We submit to the majority because we have to. But we are
not compelled to call our attitude of subjection a posture of respect.
• What this country needs what every country needs occasionally
is a good hard bloody war to revive the vice of patriotism on which
its existence as a nation depends.
• When you doubt, abstain.
• Who never doubted, never half believed. Where doubt is,
there truth is - it is her shadow.
<TOP>
|
| |

• When we hear the ancient
bells growling on a Sunday morning
we ask ourselves: Is it really possible! This, for a jew, crucified
two thousand years ago, who said he was God's son? The proof of
such a claim is lacking. Certainly the Christian religion is an
antiquity projected into our times from remote prehistory; and
the fact that the claim is believed - whereas one is otherwise
so strict in examining pretensions - is perhaps the most ancient
piece of this heritage. A god who begets children with a mortal
woman; a sage who bids men work no more, have no more courts,
but look for the signs of the impending end of the world; a justice
that accepts the innocent as a vicarious sacrifice; someone who
orders his disciples to drink his blood; prayers for miraculous
interventions; sins perpetrated against a god, atoned for by a
god; fear of a beyond to which death is the portal; the form of
the cross as a symbol in a time that no longer knows the function
and ignominy of the cross -- how ghoulishly all this touches us,
as if from the tomb of a primeval past! Can one believe that such
things are still believed?
Human, all too Human, s.405, R.J. Hollingdale transl.
• Christianity was from the beginning,
essentially and fundamentally, life's nausea and disgust with life,
merely concealed behind, masked by, dressed up as, faith in "another"
or "better" life.
The Birth of Tragedy, p.23, Walter Kaufmann transl.
• As soon as a religion comes to dominate
it has as its opponents all those who would have been its first
disciples.
Human, all too Human, s.118, R.J. Hollingdale transl.
• As long as a man knows very well
the strength and weaknesses of his teaching, his art, his religion,
its power is still slight. The pupil and apostle who, blinded by
the authority of the master and by the piety he feels toward him,
pays no attention to the weaknesses of a teaching, a religion, and
soon usually has for that reason more power than the master. The
influence of a man has never yet grown great without his blind pupils.
To help a perception to achieve victory often means merely to unite
it with stupidity so intimately that the weight of the latter also
enforces the victory of the former.
Human, all too Human, s.122, R.J. Hollingdale transl.
• A Jesus Christ was possible only in
a Jewish landscape--I mean one over which the gloomy and sublime
thunder cloud of the wrathful Yahweh was brooding continually. Only
here was the rare and sudden piercing of the gruesome and perpetual
general day-night by a single ray of the sun experienced as if it
were a miracle of "love" and the ray of unmerited "grace."
Only here could Jesus dream of his rainbow and his ladder to heaven
on which God descended to man. Everywhere else good weather and
sunshine were considered the rule and everyday occurrences.
The Gay Science, s.137, Walter Kaufmann transl
• All the world still believes in the
authorship of the "Holy Spirit" or is at least still affected
by this belief: when one opens the Bible one does so for "edification."...
That it also tells the story of one of the most ambitious and obtrusive
of souls, of a head as superstitious as it was crafty, the story
of the apostle Paul--who knows this , except a few scholars? Without
this strange story, however, without the confusions and storms of
such a head, such a soul, there would be no Christianity...
That the ship of Christianity threw overboard a good deal of its
Jewish ballast, that it went, and was able to go, among the pagans--that
was due to this one man, a very tortured, very pitiful, very unpleasant
man, unpleasant even to himself. He suffered from a fixed idea--or
more precisely, from a fixed, ever-present, never-resting question:
what about the Jewish law? and particularly the fulfillment of this
law? In his youth he had himself wanted to satisfy it, with a ravenous
hunger for this highest distinction which the Jews could conceive
- this people who were propelled higher than any other people by
the imagination of the ethically sublime, and who alone succeeded
in creating a holy god together with the idea of sin as a transgression
against this holiness. Paul became the fanatical defender of this
god and his law and guardian of his honor; at the same time, in
the struggle against the transgressors and doubters, lying in wait
for them, he became increasingly harsh and evilly disposed towards
them, and inclined towards the most extreme punishments. And now
he found that--hot-headed, sensual, melancholy, malignant in his
hatred as he was-- he was himself unable to fulfill the law; indeed,
and this seemed strangest to him, his extravagant lust to domineer
provoked him continually to transgress the law, and he had to yield
to this thorn.
Is it really his "carnal nature" that makes him transgress
again and again? And not rather, as he himself suspected later,
behind it the law itself, which must constantly prove itself unfulfillable
and which lures him to transgression with irresistable charm? But
at that time he did not yet have this way out. He had much on his
conscience - he hints at hostility, murder, magic, idolatry, lewdness,
drunkenness, and pleasure in dissolute carousing - and... moments
came when he said to himself:"It is all in vain; the torture
of the unfulfilled law cannot be overcome."... The law was
the cross to which he felt himself nailed: how he hated it! how
he searched for some means to annihilate it--not to fulfill it any
more himself!
And finally the saving thought struck him,... "It is unreasonable
to persecute this Jesus! Here after all is the way out; here is
the perfect revenge; here and nowhere else I have and hold the annihilator
of the law!"... Until then the ignominious death had seemed
to him the chief argument against the Messianic claim of which the
new doctrine spoke: but what if it were necessary to get rid of
the law?
The tremendous consequences of this idea, of this solution of the
riddle, spin before his eyes; at one stroke he becomes the happiest
man; the destiny of the Jews--no, of all men--seems to him to be
tied to this idea, to this second of its sudden illumination; he
has the thought of thoughts, the key of keys, the light of lights;
it is around him that all history must revolve henceforth. For he
is from now on the teacher of the annihilation of the law...
This is the first Christian, the inventor of Christianity. Until
then there were only a few Jewish sectarians.
Daybreak, s.68, Walter Kaufmann transl.
• Paul thought up the idea and Calvin
rethought it, that for innumerable people damnation has been decreed
from eternity, and that this beautiful world plan was instituted
to reveal the glory of God: heaven and hell and humanity are thus
supposed to exist - to satisfy the vanity of God! What cruel and
insatiable vanity must have flared in the soul of the man who thought
this up first, or second. Paul has remained Saul after all - the
persecutor of God.
The Wanderer and his Shadow, R.J. Hollingdale transl.
• If the Christian dogmas of a revengeful
God, universal sinfulness, election by divine grace and the danger
of eternal damnation were true, it would be a sign of weak-mindedness
and lack of character not to become a priest, apostle or hermit
and, in fear and trembling, to work solely on one's own salvation;
it would be senseless to lose sight of ones eternal advantage for
the sake of temporal comfort. If we may assume that these things
are at any rate believed true, then the everyday Christian cuts
a miserable figure; he is a man who really cannot count to three,
and who precisely on account of his spiritual imbecility does not
deserve to be punished so harshly as Christianity promises to punish
him.
Human, all too Human, s.116, R.J. Hollingdale transl.
• The Christian church is an encyclopaedia
of prehistoric cults and conceptions of the most diverse origin,
and that is why it is so capable of proselytizing: it always could,
and it can still go wherever it pleases and it always found, and
always finds something similar to itself to which it can adapt itself
and gradually impose upon it a Christian meaning. It is not what
is Christian in it, but the universal heathen character of its usages,
which has favored the spread of this world-religion; its ideas,
rooted in both the Jewish and the Hellenic worlds, have from the
first known how to raise themselves above national and racial niceties
and exclusiveness as though these were merely prejudices. One may
admire this power of causing the most various elements to coalesce,
but one must not forget the contemptible quality that adheres to
this power: the astonishing crudeness and self-satisfiedness of
the church's intellect during the time it was in process of formation,
which permitted it to accept any food and to digest opposites like
pebbles.
Daybreak,s. 70, R.J. Hollingdale transl
• Christianity possesses the hunters
instinct for all those who can by one means or another be brought
to despair - of which only a portion of mankind is capable. It is
constantly on their track, it lies in wait for them. Pascal attempted
the experiment of seeing whether, with the aid of the most incisive
knowledge, everyone could not be brought to despair: the experiment
miscarried, to his twofold despair.
Daybreak,s. 64, R.J. Hollingdale transl.
• The reverse side of Christian compassion
for the suffering of one's neighbor is a profound suspicion of all
the joy of one's neighbor, of his joy in all that he wants to do
and can.
Daybreak,s. 80, R.J. Hollingdale transl.
• Christianity has done its utmost to
close the circle and declared even doubt to be sin. One is supposed
to be cast into belief without reason, by a miracle, and from then
on to swim in it as in the brightest and least ambiguous of elements:
even a glance towards land, even the thought that one perhaps exists
for something else as well as swimming, even the slightest impulse
of our amphibious nature- is sin! And notice that all this means
that the foundation of belief and all reflection on its origin is
likewise excluded as sinful. What is wanted are blindness and intoxication
and an eternal song over the waves in which reason has drowned.
Daybreak,s. 89, R.J. Hollingdale transl.
<TOP>
|
|
• Truth, in matters of religion, is
simply the opinion that has survived.
The Critic as Artist (1891)
• The nineteenth century is a turning
point in history, simply on account of the work of two men, Darwin
and Renan, the one the critic of the Book of Nature, the other the
critic of the books of God. Not to recognise this is to miss the
meaning of one of the most important eras in the progress of the
world.
Gilbert, in The Critic as Artist, pt. 2 (Intentions, 1891)
• Self-denial is the shining sore on
the leprous body of Christianity.
from Frank Harris, Oscar Wilde (1918)
• Medievalism, with its saints and martyrs,
its love of self-torture, its wild passion for wounding itself,
its gashing with knives, and its whipping with rods – Medievalism
is real Christianity, and the medieval Christ is the real Christ.
"The Soul of Man under Socialism," in the Fortnightly
Review, (1891), quoted from James A Haught, ed., 2000
Years of Disbelief
• When I think of all the harm the Bible
has done, I despair of ever writing anything to equal it.
• The worst vice of the fanatic is his sincerity.
from Laird Wilcox and John George, eds., Be Reasonable: Selected
Quotations for Inquiring Minds
• The sign of a Philistine age is the
cry of immorality against art.
"Lecture Delivered to the Art Students of the Royal Academy,
June 30 1883," in Essays and Lectures (1908)
• Religion is the fashionable substitute
for belief.
The Picture of Dorian Gray (1891)
<TOP>
|
| |
• Religion
is comparable to a childhood neurosis.
• If
one wishes to form a true estimate of the full grandeur of religion,
one must keep in mind what it undertakes to do for men. It gives
them information about the source and origin of the universe, it
assures them of protection and final happiness amid the changing
vicissitudes of life, and it guides their thoughts and motions by
means of precepts which are backed by the whole force of its authority.
New Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis
• Religion
is an illusion and it derives its strength from the fact that it
falls in with our instinctual desires.
New Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis
• Devout
believers are safeguarded in a high degree against the risk of certain
neurotic illnesses; their acceptance of the universal neurosis spares
them the task of constructing a personal one.
The Future of an Illusion
• At
bottom God is nothing more than an exalted father.
Totem and Taboo
• In
the long run, nothing can withstand reason and experience, and the
contradiction religion offers to both is palpable.
The Future of an Illusion
<TOP> |
|

• We Americans claim
to be a peace-loving people. We hate bloodshed; we are opposed
to violence. Yet we go into spasms of joy over the possibility
of projecting dynamite bombs from flying machines upon helpless
citizens.
• Public school - where the human mind is drilled and manupulated
into submission to various social and moral spooks, and thus fitted
to continue our system of exploitation and oppression.
• It takes less mental effort to condemn than to think.
• The most unpardonable sin in society is independence of
thought.
• The majority cares little for ideals and integrity. What
it craves is display.
• The majority cannot reason; it has no judgement. It has
always placed its destiny in the hands of others; it has followed
its leaders even into destruction. The mass has always opposed,
condemned, and hounded the innovator, the pioneer of a new truth.
• How long would authority ... exist, if not for the willingness
of the mass to become soldiers, policemen, jailers, and hangmen.
• Social and economic well-being will become a reality only
through the zeal, courage, the non-compromising determination
of intelligent minorities, and not through the mass.
• Resistance to tyranny is man's highest ideal.
• Conceit, arrogance, and egotism are the essentials of
patriotism.
• When a child has reached manhood, he is thoroughly saturated
with the belief that he is chosen by the Lord himself to defend
his country against the attack or invasion of any foreigner. It
is for that purpose that we are clamoring for a greater army and
navy, more battleships and ammunition.
• The people are urged to be patriotic ... by sacrificing
their own children. Patriotism requires allegience to the flag,
which means obedience and readiness to kill father, mother, brother,
sister."
• The experience of every-day life fully proves that the
armed individual is invariably anxious to try his strength. The
same is historically true of governments. Really peaceful countries
do not waste life and energy in war preparations, with the result
that peace is maintained.
• The powers know that the people at large are like children
whose despair, sorrow, and tears can be turned into joy with a
little toy. ... An army and navy represents the people's toys.
• The philosophy of Atheism represents
a concept of life without any metaphysical Beyond or Divine Regulator.
It is the concept of an actual, real world with its liberating,
expanding and beautifying possibilities, as against an unreal world,
which, with its spirits, oracles, and mean contentment has kept
humanity in helpless degradation.
"The Philosophy of Atheism," in Goldman's Mother Earth
journal, February, 1916
• The worker who knows the cause of
his misery, who understands the make-up of our iniquitous social
and industrial system can do more for himself and his kind than
Christ and the followers of Christ have ever done for humanity;
certainly more than meek patience, ignorance, and submission have
done.
"The Failure of Christianity," in Goldman's Mother
Earth journal, April, 1913
• I was
called before the head matron, a tall woman with a stolid face.
She began taking my pedigree. "What religion?" was the
first question. "None, I am an atheist." "Atheism
is prohibited here. You will have to go to church." I replied
that I would do nothing of the kind. I did not believe in anything
the Church stood for and, not being a hypocrite, I would not attend.
having been sentenced to Blackwell's Island for a year for saying,
at a mass rally at Union Square, "If they do not give you work,
demand bread. If they deny you both, take bread. It is your sacred
right!" Quoted in Living My Life, p. 133, quoted from Annie
Laurie Gaylor, Women
Without Superstition, p. 382.
• I do not
believe in God, because I believe in man. Whatever his mistakes,
man has for thousands of years past been working to undo the botched
job your God has made.
speaking from a Detroit pulpit in 1898, quoted from Annie Laurie
Gaylor, Women
Without Superstition, p. 382
• How to raise this dead level of theistic
belief is really a matter of life and death for all denominations.
Therefore their tolerance; but it is a tolerance not of understanding;
but of weakness.
"The Philosophy of Atheism," in Goldman's Mother Earth
journal, February, 1916
• It is
characteristic of theistic "tolerance" that no one really
cares what the people believe in, just so they believe or pretend
to believe.
"The Philosophy of Atheism," in Goldman's Mother Earth
journal, February, 1916
• Redemption
through the Cross is worse than damnation, because of the terrible
burden it imposes upon humanity, because of the effect it has on
the human soul, fettering and paralyzing it with the weight of the
burden exacted through the death of Christ.
"The Philosophy of Atheism," in Goldman's Mother Earth
journal, February, 1916
• Emma Goldman,
Mug Shot: Septermber 1, 1893, City of Philadelphia ArchivesMankind
has been punished long and heavily for having created its gods;
nothing but pain and persecution have been man's lot since gods
began. There is but one way out of this blunder: Man must break
his fetters which have chained him to the gates of heaven and hell,
so that he can begin to fashion out of his reawakened and illumined
consciousness a new world upon earth.
"The Philosophy of Atheism," in Goldman's Mother Earth
journal, February, 1916
• Have not all theists painted their
Deity as the god of love and goodness? Yet after thousands of years
of such preachments the gods remain deaf to the agony of the human
race. Confucius cares not for the poverty, squalor and misery of
the people of China. Buddha remains undisturbed in his philosophical
indifference to the famine and starvation of outraged Hindoos; Jahve
continues deaf to the bitter cry of Israel; while Jesus refuses
to rise from the dead against his Christians who are butchering
each other.
"The Philosophy of Atheism," in Goldman's Mother Earth
journal, February, 1916
• There are ... some potentates I would
kill by any and all means at my disposal. They are Ignorance, Superstition,
and Bigotry -- the most sinister and tyrannical rulers on earth.
speaking from a Detroit pulpit in 1898,
quoted from Annie Laurie Gaylor, Women
Without Superstition, p. 382
• The burden of all song and praise
"unto the Highest" has been that God stands for justice
and mercy. Yet injustice among men is ever on the increase; the
outrages committed against the masses in this country alone would
seem enough to overflow the very heavens. But where are the gods
to make an end to all these horrors, these wrongs, this inhumanity
to man? No, not the gods, but MAN must rise in his mighty wrath.
He, deceived by all the deities, betrayed by their emissaries, he,
himself, must undertake to usher in justice upon the earth.
"The Philosophy of Atheism," in Goldman's Mother Earth
journal, February, 1916
• Do not
all theists insist that there can be no morality, no justice, honesty
or fidelity without the belief in a Divine Power? Based upon fear
and hope, such morality has always been a vile product, imbued partiy
with self-righteousness, partly with hypocrisy. As to truth, justice,
and fidelity, who have been their brave exponents and daring proclaimers?
Nearly always the godless ones: the Atheists; they lived, fought,
and died for them. They knew that justice, truth, and fidelity are
not conditioned in heaven, but that they are related to and interwoven
with the tremendous changes going on in the social and material
life of the human race; not fixed and eternal, but fluctuating,
even as life itself.
"The Philosophy of Atheism," in Goldman's Mother Earth
journal, February, 1916
• Everywhere and always, since its very
inception, Christianity has turned the earth into a vale of tears;
always it has made of life a weak, diseased thing, always it has
instilled fear in man, turning him into a dual being, whose life
energies are spent in the struggle between body and soul. In decrying
the body as something evil, the flesh as the tempter to everything
that is sinful, man has mutilated his being in the vain attempt
to keep his soul pure, while his body rotted away from the injuries
and tortures inflicted upon it.
The Christian religion and morality extols the glory of the Hereafter,
and therefore remains indifferent to the horrors of the earth. Indeed,
the idea of self-denial and of all that makes for pain and sorrow
is its test of human worth, its passport to the entry into heaven.
"The Failure of Christianity," in Goldman's Mother
Earth journal, April, 1913
• "Blessed are ye when men shall
revile you and persecute you, and say all manner of evil against
you falsely, for my sake. Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great
is your reward in heaven."
The reward in heaven is the perpetual bait, a bait that has caught
man in an iron net, a strait-jacket which does not let him expand
or grow. All pioneers of truth have been, and still are, reviled;
they have been, and still are, persecuted. But did they ask humanity
to pay the price? Did they seek to bribe mankind to accept their
ideas? They knew too well that he who accepts a truth because of
the bribe, will soon barter it away to a higher bidder....
Proud and self-reliant characters prefer hatred to such sickening
artificial love. Not because of any reward does a free spirit take
his stand for a great truth, nor has such a one ever been deterred
because of fear of punishment.
"The Failure of Christianity," in Goldman's Mother
Earth journal, April, 1913
• Emma Goldman, sppeaking in 1919 (cropped
from Library of Congress photo LC-USZ62-20178)Christianity is most
admirably adapted to the training of slaves, to the perpetuation
of a slave society; in short, to the very conditions confronting
us to-day.... The rulers of the earth have realized long ago what
potent poison inheres in the Christian religion. That is the reason
they foster it; that is why they leave nothing undone to instill
it into the blood of the people. They know only too well that the
subtleness of the Christian teachings is a more powerful protection
against rebellion and discontent than the club or the gun.
"The Failure of Christianity," in Goldman's Mother
Earth journal, April, 1913
• Atheism ... in its philosophic aspect
refuses allegiance not merely to a definite concept of God, but
it refuses all servitude to the God idea, and opposes the theistic
principle as such. Gods in their individual function are not half
as pernicious as the principle of theism which represents the belief
in a supernatural, or even omnipotent, power to rule the earth and
man upon it. It is the absolutism of theism, its pernicious influence
upon humanity, its paralyzing effect upon thought and action, which
Atheism is fighting with all its power.
"The Philosophy of Atheism," in Goldman's Mother Earth
journal, February, 1916
• So weak and helpless was this "Savior
of Men" that he must needs the whole human family to pay for
him, unto all eternity, because he "hath died for them."
Redemption through the Cross is worse than damnation, because of
the terrible burden it imposes upon humanity, because of the effect
it has on the human soul, fettering and paralyzing it with the weight
of the burden exacted through the death of Christ.
Thousands of martyrs have perished, yet few, if any, of them have
proved so helpless as the great Christian God. Thousands have gone
to their death with greater fortitude, with more courage, with deeper
faith in their ideas than the Nazarene. Nor did they expect eternal
gratitude from their fellow-men because of what they endured for
them.
Compared with Socrates and Bruno, with the great martyrs of Russia,
with the Chicago Anarchists, Francisco Ferrer, and unnumbered others,
Christ cuts a poor figure indeed. Compared with the delicate, frail
Spiridonova who underwent the most terrible tortures, the most horrible
indignities, without losing faith in herself or her cause, Jesus
is a veritable nonentity. They stood their ground and faced their
executioners with unflinching determination, and though they, too,
died for the people, they asked nothing in return for their great
sacrifice.
"The Failure of Christianity," in Goldman's Mother
Earth journal, April, 1913
• It is
safe to say that no other superstition is so detrimental to growth,
so enervating and paralyzing to the minds and hearts of the people,
as the superstition of Morality.
"Victims of Morality," in Goldman's Mother Earth journal,
March, 1913
• The abuses of Christianity, like the
abuses of government, are conditioned in the thing itself, and are
not to be charged to the representatives of the creed. Christ and
his teachings are the embodiment of submission, of inertia, of the
denial of life; hence responsible for the things done in their name.
"The Failure of Christianity,"
in Goldman's Mother Earth journal, April, 1913
• I am not interested in the theological
Christ. Brilliant minds like Bauer, Strauss, Renan, Thomas Paine,
and others refuted that myth long ago. I am even ready to admit
that the theological Christ is not half so dangerous as the ethical
and social Christ. In proportion as science takes the place of blind
faith, theology loses its hold. But the ethical and poetical Christ-myth
has so thoroughly saturated our lives that even some of the most
advanced minds find it difficult to emancipate themselves from its
yoke. They have rid themselves of the letter, but have retained
the spirit; yet it is the spirit which is back of all the crimes
and horrors committed by orthodox Christianity. The Fathers of the
Church can well afford to preach the gospel of Christ. It contains
nothing dangerous to the regime of authority and wealth; it stands
for self-denial and self-abnegation, for penance and regret, and
is absolutely inert in the face of every [in]dignity, every outrage
imposed upon mankind.
"The Failure of Christianity," in Goldman's Mother
Earth journal, April, 1913
• The God idea is growing more impersonal
and nebulous in proportion as the human mind is learning to understand
natural phenomena and in the degree that science progressively correlates
human and social events.
"The Philosophy of Atheism," in Goldman's Mother Earth
journal, February, 1916
• The triumph of the philosophy of Atheism
is to free man from the nightmare of gods; it means the dissolution
of the phantoms of the beyond.
"The Philosophy of Atheism," in Goldman's Mother Earth
journal, February, 1916
• Imagine, capitalist America also divides
the anarchists into two categories, philosophic and criminal. The
first are accepted in highest circles; one of them is even high
in the councils of the Wilson Administration. The second category,
to which we have the honor of belonging, is persecuted and often
imprisoned. Yours also seems to be a distinction without a difference.
Don't you think so?
to Lenin, responding to his claim that "We do have bandits
in prison, and Makhnovtsy, but no ideiny anarchists," quoted
from Goldman's autobiography, Living My Life
• Women need not always keep their
mouths shut and their wombs open.
words for which she was sent to prison, according to Margaret
Anderson, editor of The Little Review, quoted from Annie Laurie
Gaylor, Women
Without Superstition, p. 382
• Love, the strongest and deepest element
in all life, the harbinger of hope, of joy, of ecstasy; love, the
defier of all laws, of all conventions; love, the freest, the most
powerful moulder of human destiny; how can such an all-compelling
force be synonymous with that poor little State and Church-begotten
weed, marriage? Free love? As if love is anything but free!
"Marriage and Love" published in Anarchism and Other
Essays (1911)
<TOP> |
|
Bertrand Russell

• That
Man is the product of causes that had no prevision of the end they
were achieving; that his origin, his growth, his hopes and fears,
his loves and his beliefs, are but the outcome of accidental collocations
of atoms; that no fire, no heroism, no intensity of thought and
feeling, can preserve individual life beyond the grave; that all
the labors of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all
the noonday brightness of human genius, are destined to extinction
in the vast death of the solar system, and that the whole temple
of Man's achievement must inevitably be buried beneath the debris
of a universe in ruins- all these things, if not quite beyond dispute,
are yet so nearly certain that no philosophy which rejects them
can hope to stand. Only within the scaffolding of these truths,
only on the firm foundation of unyielding despair, can the soul's
habitation henceforth be safely built.
A Free Man's Worship (1903)
• The
world, we are told, was created by a God who is both good, and omnipotent.
Before He created the world, He foresaw all the pain and misery that
it would contain; He is therefore responsible for all of it. It is
useless to argue that the pain in the world is due to sin. In the
first place, this is not true; it is not sin that causes rivers to
overflow their banks or volcanoes to erupt. But even if it were true,
it would make no difference. If I were going to beget a child knowing
that the child was going to be a homicidal maniac, I should be responsible
for his crimes. If God knew in advance the sins of which man would
be guilty, He was clearly responsible for all the consequences of
those sins when He decided to create man.
• It
seems to me that science has a much greater likelihood of being
true in the main than any philosophy hitherto advanced (I do not,
of course, except my own). In science there are many matters about
which people are agreed; in philosophy there are none. Therefore,
although each proposition in a science may be false, and it is practically
certain that there are some that are false, yet we shall be wise
to build our philosophy upon science, because the risk of error
in philosophy is pretty sure to be greater than in science. If we
could hope for certainty in philosophy, the matter would be otherwise,
but so far as I can see such a hope would be a chimerical.
Logical Atomism (1924)
• Most
people would die sooner than think – in fact they do so.
The ABC of Relativity (1925), p. 166 <TOP> |
| |
Albert
Einstein

• Ethical
axioms are found and tested not very differently from the axioms
of science. Truth is what stands the test of experience.
• Every
day I remind myself that my inner and outer life are based on the
labors of other men, living and dead, and that I must exert myself
in order to give in the same measure as I have received and am still
receiving.
• Few
people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which
differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people
are even incapable of forming such opinions.
• I
know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World
War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.
• Only
two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm
not sure about the former.
• The
important thing is not to stop questioning. Curiosity has its own
reason for existing. One cannot help but be in awe when he contemplates
the mysteries of eternity, of life, of the marvelous structure of
reality. It is enough if one tries merely to comprehend a little
of this mystery every day. Never lose a holy curiosity.
• If
this being is omnipotent, then every occurrence, including every
human action, every human thought, and every human feeling and aspiration
is also His work; how is it possible to think of holding men responsible
for their deeds and thoughts before such an almighty Being? In giving
out punishment and rewards He would to a certain extent be passing
judgment on Himself. How can this be combined with the goodness
and righteousness ascribed to Him?
My Later Years
• If
people are good only because they fear punishment, and hope for
reward, then we are a sorry lot indeed.
• I
do not believe in the God of theology who rewards good and punishes
evil.
• A
man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy,
education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary.
Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by
fear of punishment and hope of reward after death.
Religion and Science, New York Times Magazine, 9 November 1930
• The
most beautiful experience we can have is the mysterious. It is the
fundamental emotion which stands at the cradle of true art and true
science. Whoever does not know it and can no longer wonder, no longer
marvel, is as good as dead, and his eyes are dimmed. It was the
experience of mystery – even if mixed with fear – that
engendered religion. A knowledge of the existence of something we
cannot penetrate, our perceptions of the profoundest reason and
the most radiant beauty, which only in their most primitive forms
are accessible to our minds – it is this knowledge and this
emotion that constitute true religiosity; in this sense, and in
this alone, I am a deeply religious man.
The World as I See It
• A
knowledge of the existence of something we cannot penetrate, of the
manifestations of the profoundest reason and the most radiant beauty
- it is this knowledge and this emotion that constitute the truly
religious attitude; in this sense, and in this alone, I am a deeply
religious man. • I do not believe in a personal God and I have
never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in
me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration
for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it.
• I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the orderly
harmony of what exists, not in a God who concerns himself with the
fates and actions of human beings.
• ...Common to all these types is the anthropomorphic character
of their conception of God. In general, only individuals of exceptional
endowments, and exceptionally high-minded communities, rise to any
considerable extent above this level. But there is a third stage
of religious experience which belongs to all of them, even though
it is rarely found in a pure form: I shall call it cosmic religious
feeling. It is very difficult to elucidate this feeling to anyone
who is entirely without it, especially as there is no anthropomorphic
conception of God corresponding to it. The individual feels the
futility of human desires and aims and the sublimity and marvelous
order which reveal themselves both in nature and in the world of
thought. Individual existence impresses him as a sort of prison
and he wants to experience the universe as a single significant
whole. The beginnings of cosmic religious feeling already appear
at an early stage of development, e.g., in many of the Psalms of
David and in some of the Prophets. Buddhism, as we have learned
especially from the wonderful writings of Schopenhauer, contains
a much stronger element of this. The religious geniuses of all ages
have been distinguished by this kind of religious feeling, which
knows no dogma and no God conceived in man's image; so that there
can be no church whose central teachings are based on it. Hence
it is precisely among the heretics of every age that we find men
who were filled with this highest kind of religious feeling and
were in many cases regarded by their contemporaries as atheists,
sometimes also as saints. Looked at in this light, men like Democritus,
Francis of Assisi, and Spinoza are closely akin to one another.
• As the first way out there was religion, which is implanted
into every child by way of the traditional education-machine. Thus
I came - though the child of entirely irreligious (Jewish) parents
- to a deep religiousness, which, however, reached an abrupt end
at the age of twelve. Through the reading of popular scientific
books I soon reached the conviction that much in the stories of
the Bible could not be true. The consequence was a positively fanatic
orgy of freethinking coupled with the impression that youth is intentionally
being deceived by the state through lies; it was a crushing impression.
Mistrust of every kind of authority grew out of this experience,
a skeptical attitude toward the convictions that were alive in any
specific social environment — an attitude that has never again left
me, even though, later on, it has been tempered by a better insight
into the causal connections.
• I do not believe in immortality of the individual, and
I consider ethics to be an exclusively human concern with no superhuman
authority behind it.
• Scientific research is based on the idea that everything
that takes place is determined by laws of nature, and therefore
this holds for the action of people. For this reason, a research
scientist will hardly be inclined to believe that events could be
influenced by a prayer, i.e. by a wish addressed to a Supernatural
Being.
• The religion of the future will be a cosmic religion. The
religion which based on experience, which refuses dogmatic. If there's
any religion that would cope the scientific needs it will be Buddhism....
If people are good only because they fear punishment, and hope for
reward, then we are a sorry lot indeed. The further the spiritual
evolution of mankind advances, the more certain it seems to me that
the path to genuine religiosity does not lie through the fear of
life, and the fear of death, and blind faith, but through striving
after rational knowledge Immortality? There are two kinds. The first
lives in the imagination of the people, and is thus an illusion.
There is a relative immortality which may conserve the memory of
an individual for some generations. But there is only one true immortality,
on a cosmic scale, and that is the immortality of the cosmos itself.
There is no other.
<TOP> |
| |
• The
Institutional Church (ecclesia) has killed only two kinds of people:
Those who do not believe in the teachings of Jesus Christ, and
those who do.
• Sixty
years ago I knew everything; now I know nothing; education is a
progressive discovery of our own ignorance.
• It
may be true that you can't fool all the people all the time, but
you can fool enough of them to rule a large country.
• Christianity
did not destroy paganism; it adopted it. . . . From Egypt came the
ideas of a divine trinity, the Last Judgment, and ... reward and
punishment.
• I
am still an agnostic, with pantheistic overtones. The sight of plants
and children growing inclines me to define divinity as creative
power, and to reverence this in all its manifestations, even when
they injure me. I cannot reconcile the existence of consciousness
with a deterministic and mechanistic philososphy. I am skeptical
not only of theology but also of philosophy, science, history, and
myself. I recognize supersensory possibilities but not supernatural
powers.
• I
felt more keenly than before the need of a philosophy that would
do justice to the infinite vitality of nature. In the inexhaustible
activity of the atom, in the endless resourcefulness of plants,
in the teeming fertility of animals, in the hunger and movement
of infants, in the laughter and play of children, in the love and
devotion of youth, in the restless ambition of fathers and the lifelong
sacrifice of mothers, in the undiscourageable researches of scientists
and the sufferings of genius, in the crucifixion of prophets and
the martyrdom of saints — in all things I saw the passion
of life for growth and greatness, the drama of everlasting creation.
I came to think of myself, not as a dance and chaos of molecules,
but as a brief and minute portion of that majestic process.
• What
if it is for life's sake that we must die? In truth we are not individuals;
and it is because we think ourselves such that death seems unforgivable.
We are temporary organs of the race, cells in the body of life;
we die and drop away that life may remain young and strong. If we
were to live forever, growth would be stifled, and youth would find
no room on earth. Death, like style, is the removal of rubbish,
the circumcision of the superfluous. In the midst of death life
renews itself immortally.
• A
certain tension between religion and society marks the highest stages
of every civilization. Religion begins by offering magical aid to
harassed and bewildered men; it culminates by giving to a people
that unity of morals and belief which seems so favorable to statesmanship
and art; it ends by fighting suicidally in the lost cause of the
past. For as knowledge grows or alters continually, it clashes with
mythology and theology, which change with geological leisureliness.
Priestly control of arts and letters is then felt as a galling shackle
or hateful barrier, and intellectual history takes on the character
of a "conflict between science and religion" Institutions
which were at first in the hands of the clergy, like law and punishment,
education and morals, marriage and divorce, tend to escape from
ecclesiastical control and become secular, perhaps profane. The
intellectual classes abandon the ancient theology and -- after some
hesitation -- the moral code allied with it; literature and philosophy
become anticlerical. The movement of liberation rises to an exuberant
worship of reason, and falls to a paralyzing disillusionment with
every dogma and every idea. Conduct, deprived of its religious supports,
deteriorates into epicurean chaos; and life itself, shorn of consoling
faith, becomes a burden alike, to conscious poverty and to weary
wealth. In the end, a society and its religion tend to fall together,
like body and soul, in a harmonious death. Meanwhile, among the
oppressed, another myth arises, gives new form to human hope, new
courage to human effort, and after centuries of chaos builds another
civilization.
• These
church steeples, everywhere pointing upward, ignoring despair and
lifting hope, these lofty city spires, or simple chapels in the hills
-- they rise at every step from the earth toward the sky; in every
village of every nation they challenge doubt and invite weary hearts
to consolation. Is it all a vain delusion? Is there nothing beyond
life but death, and nothing beyond death but decay? We cannot know.
But as long as man suffers, these steeples will remain.
<TOP>
|
|
Ezra
Pound
• Religion, oh, just another of those numerous
failures resulting from an attempt to popularize art.
letter (undated), to Pound's fiancée,
Mary Moore (from the Van Pelt Library, University of Pennsylvania),
in Humphrey Carpenter, A Serious Character, pt. 1, ch. 8 (1988),
quoted from The Columbia Dictionary of Quotations
• A heroic figure ... not wholly to
blame for the religion that's been foisted on him.
describing Jesus Christ, to the father of Pound's bride-to-be,
Dorothy Shakespear, explaining his reasons for not wanting a church
wedding, in: Humphrey Carpenter, A Serious Character, pt. 2, ch.
13 (1988), quoted from The Columbia Dictionary of Quotations
• A civilized man is one who will give
a serious answer to a serious question. Civilization itself is a
certain sane balance of values.
• A man of genius has a right to any mode of expression.
• A slave is one who waits for someone to come and free
him. • And New York is the most beautiful city in the
world? It is not far from it. No urban night is like the night there...
Squares after squares of flame, set up and cut into the aether. Here
is our poetry, for we have pulled down the stars to our will.
• Any general statement is like a check drawn on a bank.
Its value depends on what is there to meet it. • As
a bathtub lined with white porcelain, when the hot water gives out
or goes tepid, so is the slow cooling of our chivalrous passion, o
my much praised but-not-altogether-satisfactory lady. •
But the one thing you should. not do is to suppose that when something
is wrong with the arts, it is wrong with the arts ONLY. •
Either move or be moved. • Genius... is the capacity
to see ten things where the ordinary man sees one. •
Good art however "immoral" is wholly a thing of virtue.
Good art can NOT be immoral. By good art I mean art that bears true
witness, I mean the art that is most precise. • Good
writers are those who keep the language efficient. That is to say,
keep it accurate, keep it clear. • Humanity is the
rich effluvium, it is the waste and the manure and the soil, and from
it grows the tree of the arts. • I consider criticism
merely a preliminary excitement, a statement of things a writer has
to clear up in his own head sometime or other, probably antecedent
to writing; of no value unless it come to fruit in the created work
later. • I could I trust starve like a gentleman. It's
listed as part of the poetic training, you know. •
I dunno what my 23 infantile years in America signify. I left as soon
as motion was autarchic - I mean my motion. • I guess
the definition of a lunatic is a man surrounded by them.
• If a patron buys from an artist who needs money, the patron
then makes himself equal to the artist; he is building art into the
world; he creates. • If the individual, or heretic,
gets hold of some essential truth, or sees some error in the system
being practiced, he commits so many marginal errors himself that he
is worn out before he can establish his point. • It
ought to be illegal for an artist to marry. If the artist must marry
let him find someone more interested in art, or his art, or the artist
part of him, than in him. After which let them take tea together three
times a week. • Literature is news that stays news.
• Men do not understand books until they have a certain
amount of life, or at any rate no man understands a deep book, until
he has seen and lived at least part of its contents. •
Music begins to atrophy when it departs too far from the dance...
poetry begins to atrophy when it gets too far from music.
• No man understands a deep book until he has seen and lived
at least part of its contents. • Nothing written for
pay is worth printing. Only what has been written against the market.
• People find ideas a bore because they do not distinguish
between live ones and stuffed ones on a shelf. • Properly,
we should read for power. Man reading should be man intensely alive.
The book should be a ball of light in one's hand. •
Real education must ultimately be limited to men who insist on knowing,
the rest is mere sheep-herding. • The art of letters
will come to an end before A.D. 2000. I shall survive as a curiosity.
• The real meditation is... the meditation on one's identity.
Ah, voila une chose! You try it. You try finding out why you're you
and not somebody else. And who in the blazes are you anyhow? Ah, voila
une chose! • The worst mistake I made was that stupid,
suburban prejudice of anti-Semitism. • There is natural
ignorance and there is artificial ignorance. I should say at the present
moment the artificial ignorance is about eighty-five per cent.
• There is no reason why the same man should like the same
books at eighteen and forty-eight. • There once was
a brainy baboon who always breathed down a bassoon for he said, "It
appears that in billions of years I shall certainly hit on a tune."
• 'Tis the white stag, Fame, we're a-hunting, bid the world's
hounds come to horn! • Wars are made to make debt.
• When two men in business always agree, one of them is
unnecessary. • When you cannot make up your mind which
of two evenly balanced courses of action you should take - choose
the bolder.
<TOP> |
|
• [Atheism] believes
that truth for truth's sake is the highest ideal and that virtue
is its own reward.
from The Philosophy of Atheism
• A precept claiming infallibility
should certainly possess the universality of the law of gravitation
and the perfection of the arithmetical table. If it fails to possess
these undeviating qualities, its imperfection is self-evident and
its value either greatly diminished or useless.
from The Ten Commandments ("The Seventh Commandment"
-- page 457)
• Is it not better to place a question
mark upon a problem while seeking an answer than to put the label
"God" there and consider the matter closed?
from The Philosophy of Atheism
• If Atheism writes upon the blackboard
of the Universe a question mark, it writes it for the purpose of
stating that there is a question yet to be answered. Is it not better
to place a question mark upon a problem while seeking an answer
than to put the label "God" there and consider the matter
solved? Does not the word "God" only confuse and make
more difficult the solution by assuming a conclusion that is utterly
groundless and palpably absurd?
from The Philosophy of Atheism
• Facts and not merely opinions are
what we want. Emotionalism is not a substitute for the truth.
from The Philosophy of Atheism
• Man's inhumanity to man will continue
as long as man loves God more than he loves his fellow man.
from An Atheist Manifesto
• I do not believe that if there is
a God of this vast universe that such a God would create a hell
to torment to all eternity helpless and innocent human beings. I
defend the God of the religionists against the libels of his own
believers.
answer to preacher Jack Coe
• As superstition is the weed of the
brain, it grows perfusely, once started.
The Ten Commandments (page 202)
• Praying as a public function, particularly
when led by a clergyman, is a vulgar display of an exclusively personal
matter.
"Ingersoll the Magnificent" (Memorial Dedication Address,
August 11, 1954)
• Of the ten crimes which Biblical
Hebrew law punished by stoning, nine have ceased to be offenses
in modern society.
from The Ten Commandments ("The Eighth Commandment")
• Imagine using as an authority in
the matter of marriage the opinion of a celibate priest!
from The Philosophy of Atheism
• When the tyranny of the state is
combined with the hypocrisy of the church, you have a modern example
of the twin vultures that have devoured man, and his rights, throughout
the ages.
"Ingersoll the Magnificent" (Memorial Dedication
Address, August 11, 1954)
• On too many occasions, especially
in matters concerning purported conversations and messages from
gods, mystery has been employed by charlatans to hoodwink the people.
The Ten Commandments, p. 4
• Changing a rod into a serpent and
the serpent back into a rod may be clever magic, but how does such
a demonstration prove that Moses spoke to God? If the only thing
necessary to prove the truth of an extraordinary claim were to demonstrate
an ability to bewilder, there would be no more mysteries to solve.
• If a person claims that he can bring the dead back to life,
and in proof of that power pulls a rabbit out of a hat, that is
hardly a demonstration of the truth of his claim; it is merely an
example of his ability in the art of deception. If he claims that
he can fly without wings and without the use of mechanical help
of any kind, and in proof of his ability pulls another rabbit out
of another hat, that is not proof of his ability to fly, but of
his ability to lie, and he will without much hesitation be condemned
as a faker. The demonstration of one thing has absolutely no bearing
in proving the truth of the other, when there is no relationship
between them.
The Ten Commandments, pp. 66-7
• Religion is all profit. They have
no merchandise to buy, no commissions to pay, and no refunds to
make for unsatisfactory service and results...Their commodity is
fear. They blackmail their parishioners with threats of hell and
damnation. These poor deluded people give them their hard earned
money to save them from a hell that does not exist, and from eternal
torment that was invented by the perverted minds of priests to rob
the living and in addition, they are exempt from taxation! Insult
to injury!
• Let me tell you that religion is
the cruelest fraud ever perpetrated upon the human race. It is the
last of the great scheme of thievery that man must legally prohibit
so as to protect himself from the charlatans who prey upon the ignorance
and fears of the people.
The penalty for this type of extortion should be as severe as it
is of other forms of dishonesty.
"Ingersoll the Magnificent" (Memorial Dedication Address,
August 11, 1954)
• The news of Mr. Edison's death fell
upon me like a pall. I felt as if a great void had been left in
the world. What a pity that he could not have stayed the hand of
death so that he could continue to unravel the secrets of Nature.
What sort of "design" can there be in life when this grandest
of all men is cut down unceremoniously by the Grim Reaper's scythe
while idiots and imbeciles live on? This great genius is irreparably
lost to the world.
"A Visit With Thomas Alva Edison"
• With this recognition of the finality
of death, no one should willingly withhold acts that would bring
benefits, joy or happiness to others.
from An Atheist Manifesto
<TOP> |
|
• A doctrine insulates
the devout not only against the realities around them but also against
their own selves. The fanatical believer is not conscious of his
envy, malice, pettiness and dishonesty. There is a wall of words
between his consciousness and his real self.
• It is not at all simple to understand
the simple.
• The uncompromising attitude is more
indicative of an inner uncertainty than a deep conviction. The implacable
stand is directed more against the doubt within than the assailant
without.
• Absolute faith corrupts as absolutely
as absolute power.
• There is always a chance that he who
sets himself up as his brother's keeper will end up by being his
jail-keeper.
• Whoever originated the cliche that
money is the root of all evil knew hardly anything about the nature
of evil and very little about human beings.
• The monstrous evils of the twentieth
century have shown us that the greediest money grubbers are gentle
doves compared with money-hating wolves like Lenin, Stalin, and
Hitler, who in less than three decades killed or maimed nearly a
hundred million men, women, and children and brought untold suffering
to a large portion of mankind.
• Every era has a currency that buys
souls. In some the currency is pride, in others it is hope, in still
others it is a holy cause. There are of course times when hard cash
will buy souls, and the remarkable thing is that such times are
marked by civility, tolerance, and the smooth working of everyday
life.
• People who bite the hand that feeds
them usually lick the boot that kicks them.
• The capacity for getting along with
our neighbor depends to a large extent on the capacity for getting
along with ourselves. The self-respecting individual will try to
be as tolerant of his neighbor's shortcomings as he is of his own.
• The opposite of the religious fanatic
is not the fanatical atheist but the gentle cynic who cares not
whether there is a god or not.
• You can discover what your enemy fears
most by observing the means he uses to frighten you.
• To know a person's religion we need
not listen to his profession of faith but must find his brand of
intolerance.
• The remarkable thing is that we really
love our neighbors as ourselves: we do unto others as we do unto ourselves.
We hate others when we hate ourselves. We are tolerant of others when
we tolerate ourselves. We forgive others when we forgive ourselves.
We are prone to sacrifice others when we are ready to sacrifice ourselves.
<TOP> |
| |
• God...a being whose
only definition is that he is beyond man's power to conceive.
• Religion is a primitive form of philosophy,
[the] attempt to offer a comprehensive view of reality.
The Objectivist Feb 1966 WMail Issue #5
• Rationality is the recognition
of the fact that existence exists, that nothing can alter the truth
and nothing can take precedence over that act of perceiving it,
which is thinking...
Atlas Shrugged
• Do you believe in God,
Andrei? No. Neither do I. But that's a favorite question of mine.
An upside-down question, you know. What do you mean? Well, if I
asked people whether they believed in life, they'd never understand
what I meant. It's a bad question. It can mean so much that it really
means nothing. So I ask them if they believe in God. And if they
say they do -- then, I know they don't believe in life. Why? Because,
you see, God -- whatever anyone chooses to call God -- is one's
highest conception of the highest possible. And whoever places his
highest conception above his own possibility thinks very little
of himself and his life. It's a rare gift, you know, to feel reverence
for your own life and to want the best, the greatest, the highest
possible, here, now, for your very own.
We The Living Part One Chapter 9
<TOP> |
|
• No, I don't believe
in a god and as far as when I die, I'm looking forward to a nice,
long rest in the ground!
• I'm an atheist, and that's it. I believe
there's nothing we can know except that we should be kind to each
other and do what we can for people.
• I don't fear the next world, or anything.
I don't fear hell, and I don't look forward to heaven.
• If you always do what interests you,
at least one person is pleased.
• If you obey all the rules you miss all the fun.
Life is hard. After all, it kills
you.
• My greatest strength is common sense. I'm really a standard
brand - like Campbell's tomato soup or Baker's chocolate.
• We are taught you must blame your father, your sisters,
your brothers, the school, the teachers - but never blame yourself.
It's never your fault. But it's always your fault, because if you
wanted to change you're the one who has got to change.
• Enemies are so stimulating.
• I never realized until lately that women were supposed
to be the inferior sex.
• Loved people are loving people.
• If you’re given a choice between money and sex appeal,
take the money. As you get older, the money will become your sex
appeal.
• Life can be wildly tragic
at times, and I've had my share. But whatever happens to you, you
have to keep a slightly comic attitude. In the final analysis, you
have got to not forget to laugh.
<TOP> |
| |
• One of the most frightening
things in the Western world, and in this country in particular,
is the number of people who believe in things that are scientifically
false. If someone tells me that the earth is less than 10,000 years
old, in my opinion he should see a psychiatrist.
• In the fullness of time,
educated people will believe there is no soul independent of the
body, and hence no life after death.
• If revealed religions
have revealed anything it is that they are usually wrong.
• A knowledge of the true age of the
earth and of the fossil record makes it impossible for any balanced
intellect to believe in the literal truth of every part of the Bible
in the way that fundamentalists do. And if some of the Bible is
manifestly wrong, why should any of the rest of it be accepted automatically?
What Mad Pursuit
• A belief, at the time
it was formulated, may not only have appealed to the imagination
but also fit well with all that was then known. It can nevertheless
be made to appear ridiculous because of facts uncovered later by
science. What could be more foolish than to base one's entire view
of life on ideas that, however plausible at that time, now appear
to be quite erroneous? And what would be more important than to
find our true place in the universe by removing one by one these
unfortunate vestiges of earlier beliefs? Yet it is clear that some
mysteries have still to be explained scientifically. While these
remain unexplained, they can serve as an easy refuge for religious
superstition. It seemed to me of the first importance to identify
these unexplained areas of knowledge and to work toward their scientific
understanding whether such explanations would turn out to confirm
existing beliefs or to refute them.
What Mad Pursuit
<TOP> |
| |
Arthur C. Clarke
• It may be that our
role on this planet is not to worship God, but to create him.
• (You don't believe in
organized religion, yet a major theme in so many of your works seems
to be a quest for God.)Yes, in a way--a quest for ultimate values,
whatever they are. My objection to organized religion is the premature
conclusion to ultimate truth that it represents...
Playboy interview with Ken Kelly, 1986
• You will find men like
him in all of the world's religions. They know that we represent
reason and science, and, however confident they may be in their
beliefs, they fear that we will overthrow their gods. Not necessarily
through any deliberate act, but in a subtler fashion. Science can
destroy a religion by ignoring it as well as by disproving its tenets.
No one ever demonstrated, so far as I am aware, the nonexistance
of Zeus or Thor, but they have few followers now.
Childhood's End
• I would defend the liberty
of concenting adult creationists to practice whatever intellectual
perversions they like in the privacy of their own homes; but it
is also necessary to protect the young and innocent.
• A faith that cannot survive
collision with the truth is not worth many regrets.
• The statement that God
created man in his own image is ticking like a time bomb in the
foundations of Christianity.
• I have encountered a
few creationists and because they were usually nice, intelligent
people, I have been unable to decide whether they were really mad,
or only pretending to be mad. If I was a religious person, I would
consider creationism nothing less than blasphemy. Do its adherents
imagine that God is a cosmic hoaxer who has created that whole vast
fossil record for the sole purpose of misleading mankind?
June 5, 1998, in the essay Presidents, Experts, and Asteroids
• Any sufficiently advanced
technology is indistinguishable from magic.
Clarke's Third Law from Profiles of the Future: An Inquiry into the
Limits of the Possible
<TOP> |
|
• In those days, in Far
Rockaway, there was a youth center for Jewish kids at the temple....
Somebody nominated me for president of the youth center. The elders
began getting nervous, because I was an avowed atheist by that time....
I thought nature itself was so interesting that I didn't want it
distorted like that [by miracle stories]. And so I gradually came
to disbelieve the whole religion.
• There is no harm in doubt and skepticism,
for it is through these that new discoveries are made.
• No problem is too small or too trivial
if we can really do something about it.
• You see, one thing is, I can live
with doubt and uncertainty and not knowing. I think it's much more
interesting to live not knowing than to have answers which might
be wrong. I have approximate answers and possible beliefs and different
degrees of uncertainty about different things, but I am not absolutely
sure of anything and there are many things I don't know anything
about, such as whether it means anything to ask why we're here.
• God was invented to explain mystery.
God is always invented to explain those things that you do not understand.
Now, when you finally discover how something works, you get some
laws which you're taking away from God; you don't need him anymore.
But you need him for the other mysteries. So therefore you leave
him to create the universe because we haven't figured that out yet;
you need him for understanding those things which you don't believe
the laws will explain, such as consiousness, or why you only live
to a certain length of time -- life and death -- stuff like that.
God is always associated with those things that you do not understand.
Therefore I don't think that the laws can be considered to be like
God because they have been figured out.
• For a successful technology, reality
must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be
fooled.
• You can know the name of a bird in
all the languages of the world, but when you're finished, you'll
know absolutely nothing whatever about the bird... So let's look
at the bird and see what it's doing -- that's what counts. I learned
very early the difference between knowing the name of something
and knowing something.
• I believe that a scientist looking
at nonscientific problems is just as dumb as the next guy.
• I was born not knowing and have had
only a little time to change that here and there.
• If I could explain it to the average
person, I wouldn't have been worth the Nobel Prize.
• It doesn't matter how beautiful your
theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree
with experiment, it's wrong.
• It is in the admission of ignorance
and the admission of uncertainty that there is a hope for the continuous
motion of human beings in some direction that doesn't get confined,
permanently blocked, as it has so many times before in various periods
in the history of man.
• Poets say science takes away from
the beauty of the stars - mere globs of gas atoms. I, too, can see
the stars on a desert night, and feel them. But do I see less or
more?
• I stand at the seashore, alone, and
start to think. There are the rushing waves ... mountains of molecules,
each stupidly minding its own business ... trillions apart ... yet
forming white surf in unison.
Ages on ages ... before any eyes could see ... year after year ...
thunderously pounding the shore as now. For whom, for what?...on
a dead planet, with no life to entertain.
• Never at rest ... tortured by energy ... wasted prodigiously
by the sun ... poured into space. A mite makes the sea roar.
Deep in the sea, all molecules repeat the patterns of one another
till complex new ones are formed. They make others like themselves
... and a new dance starts.
• Growing in size and complexity ... living things, masses
of atoms, DNA, protein ... dancing a pattern ever more intricate.
Out of the cradle on to the dry land ... here it is standing ...
atoms with consciousness ... matter with curiosity.
Stands at the sea ... wonders at wondering ... I ... a universe
of atoms ... an atom in the universe.
The Pleasure of Finding Things Out, as
quoted by Inayat Bunglawala at this
link.
• Scientific views end in awe and mystery,
lost at the edge in uncertainty, but they appear to be so deep and
so impressive that the theory that it is all arranged as a stage
for God to watch man's struggle for good and evil seems inadequate.
• We are at the very beginning of time
for the human race. It is not unreasonable that we grapple with
problems. But there are tens of thousands of years in the future.
Our responsibility is to do what we can, learn what we can, improve
the solutions, and pass them on.
• I'm smart enough to know that I'm
dumb.
• When things are going well, something
will go wrong.
• When things just can't get any worse, they will.
Anytime things appear to be going better, you have overlooked something.
• We are trying to prove ourselves wrong
as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.
<TOP> |
| |
• Individual science fiction
stories may seem as trivial as ever to the blinder critics and philosophers
of today — but the core of science fiction, its essence, the
concept around which it revolves, has become crucial to our salvation
if we are to be saved at all.
My Own View in The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction (1978) edited
by Robert Holdstock; later published in Asimov on Science Fiction
(1981)
• It is change, continuing change, inevitable
change, that is the dominant factor in society today. No sensible
decision can be made any longer without taking into account not
only the world as it is, but the world as it will be ... This, in
turn, means that our statesmen, our businessmen, our everyman must
take on a science fictional way of thinking.
My Own View in The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction (1978) edited
by Robert Holdstock; later published in Asimov on Science Fiction
(1981).
• I am an atheist, out and out. It took
me a long time to say it. I've been an atheist for years and years,
but somehow I felt it was intellectually unrespectable to say one
was an atheist, because it assumed knowledge that one didn't have.
Somehow, it was better to say one was a humanist or an agnostic.
I finally decided that I'm a creature of emotion as well as of reason.
Emotionally, I am an atheist. I don't have the evidence to prove
that God doesn't exist, but I so strongly suspect he doesn't that
I don't want to waste my time.
Free Inquiry (Spring 1982)
• If my doctor told me I had only six minutes to live, I wouldn’t
brood. I’d type a little faster.
LIFE magazine (January 1984)
• Imagine the people who believe such
things and who are not ashamed to ignore, totally, all the patient
findings of thinking minds through all the centures since the Bible
was written. And it is these ignorant people, the most uneducated,
the most unimaginative, the most unthinking among us, who would
make themselves the guides and leaders of us all; who would force
their feeble and childish beliefs on us; who would invade our schools
and libraries and homes. I personally resent it bitterly.
Canadian Atheists Newsletter (1994)
• Never let your sense
of morals prevent you from doing what is right.
• There's something about a pious man such as he. He will
cheerfully cut your throat if it suits him, but he will hesitate
to endanger the welfare of your immaterial and problematical soul.
The Big and the Little, Astounding Science-Fiction, August 1944
• Now any dogma, based
primarily on faith and emotionalism, is a dangerous weapon to use
on others, since it is almost impossible to guarantee that the weapon
will never be turned on the user.
• Creationists make it
sound as though a 'theory' is something you dreamt up after being
drunk all night.
• I prefer rationalism to atheism. The question of God and
other objects-of-faith are outside reason and play no part in rationalism,
thus you don't have to waste your time in either attacking or defending.
• Although the time of
death is approaching me, I am not afraid of dying and going to Hell
or (what would be considerably worse) going to the popularized version
of Heaven. I expect death to be nothingness and, for removing me
from all possible fears of death, I am thankful to atheism.
On Religiosity, Free Inquiry
• When I die I won't go
to heaven or hell, there will just be nothingness.
A World of Ideas
<TOP> |
|

What the Gospels actually said was: don't
kill anyone until you are absolutely sure they aren't well connected.
Slaughterhouse
5
The name of the new religion, said Rumfoord,
is The Church of God the Utterly Indifferent. . . The two chief
teachings of this religion are these: Puny man can do nothing at
all to help or please God Almighty, and Luck is not the hand of
God.
The
Sirens of Titan
How on earth can religious people believe
in so much arbitrary, clearly invented balderdash?....The acceptance
of a creed, any creed, entitles the acceptor to membership in the
sort of artificial extended family we call a congregation. It is
a way to fight loneliness. Any time I see a person fleeing from
reason and into religion, I think to myself, There goes a person
who simply cannot stand being so goddamned lonely anymore.
2000
Years of Disbelief, Famous People with the Courage to Doubt
I am of course a skeptic about the divinity
of Christ and a scorner of the notion that there is a God who cares
about how we are or what we do. ... Religious skeptics often become
very bitter towards the end, as did Mark Twain. ... I know why I
will become bitter. I will finally realize that I have had it right
all along: that I will not see God, that there is no heaven or Judgement
Day.
2000
Years of Disbelief, Famous People with the Courage to Doubt
The trouble with God isn't that He so seldom
makes Himself known to us... He's holding you and me and everybody
else by the scruff of the neck practically constantly... Contentedly
adrift in the cosmos, were you?... That is a perfect description
of a non-epiphany, that rarest of moments, when God Almighty lets
go of the scruff of your neck and lets you be human for a little
while...
Bluebeard,
pg. 173
How on earth can religious people believe
in so much arbitrary, clearly invented balderdash? ... The acceptance
of a creed, any creed, entitles the acceptor to membership in the
sort of artificial extended family we call a congregation. It is
a way to fight lonliness. Any time I see a person fleeing from reason
into religion, I think to myself, There goes a person who simply
cannot stand being so goddamned lonely anymore.
address to a Unitarian congregation, Cambridge, Mass., January
27, 1980. quoted in 2000
Years of Disbelief, Famous People with the Courage to Doubt
The sermon was based on what he claimed was
a well-known fact, that there were no Atheists in foxholes. I asked
Jack what he thought of the sermon afterwards, and he said, 'There's
a Chaplain who never visited the front.' Hocus
Pocus, pg. 182
Artists use frauds to make human beings seem
more wonderful than they really are. Dancers show us human beings
who move much more gracefully than human beings really move. Films
and books and plays show us people talking much more entertainingly
than people really talk, make paltry human enterprises seem important.
Singers and musicians show us human beings making sounds far more
lovely than human beings really make. Architects give us temples
in which something marvelous is obviously going on. Actually, practically
nothing is going on.
Wampeters,
Foma and Granfallons, When I Was Twenty-One
Say what you will about the sweet miracle
of unquestioning faith. I consider the capacity for it terrifying.
I am an atheist (or at best a Unitarian who
winds up in church quite a lot). Fates
Worse than Death: An Auotbiographical Collage of the 1980's
Interviewer: Did the study of anthropology later color your writings?
Vonnegut: It confirmed my atheism, which was
the faith of my fathers anyway. Religions were exhibited and studied
as the Rube Goldberg inventions I'd always thought they were.
All these people talk so eloquently about
getting back to good old-fashioned values. Well, as an old poop
I can remember back to when we had those old-fashioned values, and
I say let's get back to the good old-fashioned First Amendment of
the good old-fashioned Constitution of the United States -- and
to hell with the censors! Give me knowledge or give me death!
I am a humanist, which means, in part, that
I have tried to behave decently without any expectation of rewards
or punishments after I’m dead.
<TOP> |
|
• How do I define God? I don't. Divinities
have been understood in various ways in the cultural traditions
that we know. Take, say, the core of the established religions today:
the Bible. It is basically polytheistic, with the warrior God demanding
of his chosen people that they not worship the other Gods and destroy
those who do – in an extremely brutal way, in fact. It would
be hard to find a more genocidal text in the literary canon, or
a more violent and destructive character than the God who was to
be worshipped. So that's one definition.
In the Prophets, one finds (sometimes) a different conception, much
more humane. That's why the Prophets (the "dissident intellectuals"
of their day) were persecuted, imprisoned, driven into the desert,
etc. – other reasons included their geopolitical analysis,
unwelcome to power. The intellectuals who were honored and privileged
were those who centuries later were called "false prophets."
More or less a cultural universal. There were different conceptions
of divinity associated with these tendencies, and Greek and Zoroastrian
influences are probable causes for later monotheistic tendencies
(how one evaluates these are a different matter).
Looking beyond, we find other conceptions, of many kinds. But I
have nothing to propose. People who find such conceptions important
for themselves have every right to frame them as they like. Personally,
I don't. That's why you haven't found my "thoughts on this
[for you] criticaI question." I have none, because I see no
need for them (apart from the -- often extremely interesting and
revealing – inquiry into human culture an history).
As for "First Principles," basing them on divinities is,
I think, a very bad idea. That leaves anyone free to pick the "first
principles" they choose on other grounds, and to disguise the
choices as "what God commands." If its the warrior God
of the Bible, the First Principles are horrendous (in the basic
texts) and often uplifting – in Amos, for example; but recall
that he made it clear that he was no intellectual (no "prophet,"
as the obscure Hebrew word is translated), but an ordinary farmer.
If you like Maslow's choices, fine, then say so. But nothing is
gained by investing them with divinity, and a great deal is lost:
specifically, the opportunity to question, elaborate, modify, or
reject them. But these are basic elements of decent human life and
thought, I believe.
If you want to use the word "God" to refer to "what
you are and what you want" -- well, that's a terminological
decision, not a substantive one. And a bad terminological decision,
I think, for the reasons just mentioned.
Is "reality an accident"? Could the laws of nature have
been other than what they are? Maybe one can make some sense of
such questions, but bringing divinity into the story helps not at
all. It only adds confusion and deflects serious thought and inquiry.
Is it "possible that the nature of reality could be a living
urge towards freedom"? As Bakunin put it, is an "instinct
for freedom" part of human nature, maybe part of organic nature?
Could be. I hope so. But we don't know. But again, bringing divinity
in just adds confusion and bars serious inquiry and action, in my
opinion.
Others feel differently. They feel they need to ground their beliefs
and hopes in something they call "God." OK. I don't legislate
for others, but if they want my advice (no reason why they should),
it's more or less as above.
On the linguistic work, it bears on these issues only tangentially,
by seeking to explore some aspects of our essential and distinctive
human nature. An exciting enterprise, I think, but these questions
are barely touched.
From ZNet's ChomskyChat (www.lbbs.org), 1998 May 17, Reply to
Darrenn Bills, on Definition of God.
<TOP> |
|
• I suggest that we might want to depose
this incumbent God and start dealing with The Real World. He's proven
— time and again — to be cruel, capricious, and vindictive.
He drowns, crushes, burns, and starves millions of us every day.
He created cancer, viruses, and germs to invade and destroy our
bodies as He sees fit, and uses them very effectively. In His wisdom,
He directed those in charge to impede stem cell research so that
such a powerful approach would not be available to us and He wouldn't
have to strain the Divine Intellect to disarm that defense. We amuse
Him as we flail about vainly trying to appease Him. I vote that
we dump Him.
Swift, 2 September 2005, "Off-Subject But Necessary";
in response to efforts to deflect Hurricane Katrina by prayer
•… it's time for the opening lecture
in Test Design 101: Consider: a woman claims to be a musician. You
seat her at a piano and demand that she prove her claim. She cannot
play the piano, and you conclude that her claim has been invalidated.
Hardly. You see, the lady is a cellist….You cannot challenge
a claimant to do something they've never claimed they can do. That's
why, at the JREF, we design a protocol only after the applicant
has clearly stated (a) what they can do, (b) under what conditions,
and (c) with what expected degree of success. And, the applicant
must find the protocol appropriate, fair, agreeable, and adequate
to prove their claim.
Swift, 21 October 2005, "Good Intentions"; about testing
paranormal claims
• Uri Geller may have psychic powers
by means of which he can bend spoons; if so, he appears to be doing
it the hard way.
An Encyclopedia of Claims, Frauds, and Hoaxes of the Occult
and Supernatural
• Sir, there is a distinct difference
between having an open mind and having a hole in your head from
which your brain leaks out.
Swift, 30 December 2005, "McGill University Featuring Pseudoscience"
• The conjuror or con man is a very
good provider of information. He sup
plies lots of data, by inference or direct statement, but it's false
data. Scientists aren't used to that scenario. An electron or a
galaxy is not capricious, nor deceptive; but a human can be either
or both.
Swift, 2 September 2005, "Another New Fan"
• I hereby state my opinion that the
notion of a god is a basic superstition and that there is no evidence
for the existence of any god(s). Further, devils, demons, angels
and saints are myths; there is no life after death, no heaven or
hell; the Pope is a dangerous, bigoted, medieval dinosaur, and the
Holy Ghost is a comic-book character worthy of laughter and derision.
I accuse the Christian god of murder by allowing the Holocaust to
take place–not to mention the 'ethnic cleansing' presently
being performed by Christians in our world–and I condemn and
vilify this mythical deity for encouraging racial prejudice and
commanding the degradation of women.
Skeptic magazine (1995 Vol.3 No.4 p.11)
<TOP> |
| |
• Extraordinary claims
require extraordinary evidence.
• Such reports persist
and proliferate because they sell. And they sell, I think, because
there are so many of us who want so badly to be jolted out of our
humdrum lives, to rekindle that sense of wonder we remember from
childhood, and also, for a few of the stories, to be able, really
and truly, to believe--in Someone older, smarter, and wiser who
is looking out for us. Faith is clearly not enough for many people.
They crave hard evidence, scientific proof. They long for the scientific
seal of approval, but are unwilling to put up with the rigorous
standards of evidence that impart credibility to that seal.
• For me, it is far better
to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion,
however satisfying and reassuring.
• One of the saddest lessons
of history is this: If we've been bamboozled long enough, we tend
to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We're no longer interested
in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. it is simply
too painful to acknowledge – even to ourselves – that
we've been so credulous. (So the old bamboozles tend to persist
as the new bamboozles rise.)
The Fine Art of Baloney Detection
• Finding the occasional
straw of truth awash in a great ocean of confusion and bamboozle
requires intelligence, vigilance, dedication and courage. But if
we don't practice these tough habits of thought, we cannot hope
to solve the truly serious problems that face us – and we
risk becoming a nation of suckers, up for grabs by the next charlatan
who comes along.
The Fine Art of Baloney Detection
• I maintain there is much
more wonder in science than in pseudoscience. And in addition, to
whatever measure this term has any meaning, science has the additional
virtue, and it is not an inconsiderable one, of being true.
The Burden Of Skepticism
•In science it often happens
that scientists say, 'You know that's a really good argument; my
position is mistaken,' and then they actually change their minds
and you never hear that old view from them again. They really do
it. It doesn't happen as often as it should, because scientists
are human and change is sometimes painful. But it happens every
day. I cannot recall the last time something like that happened
in politics or religion.
1987 CSICOP keynote address
• The idea that God is
an oversized white male with a flowing beard who sits in the sky
and tallies the fall of every sparrow is ludicrous. But if by God
one means the set of physical laws that govern the universe, then
clearly there is such a God. This God is emotionally unsatisfying...
it does not make much sense to pray to the law of gravity.
• You can't convince a
believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence,
it's based on a deep seated need to believe.
Dr. Arroway in Carl Sagan's Contact
• A celibate clergy is
an especially good idea, because it tends to suppress any hereditary
propensity toward fanaticism.
Contact, pg 244
• The major religions on
the Earth contradict each other left and right You can't all be
correct. And what if all of you are wrong? It's a possibility, you
know. You must care about the truth, right? Well, the way to winnow
through all the differing contentions is to be skeptical. I'm not
any more skeptical about your religious beliefs than I am about
every new scientific idea I hear about. But in my line of work,
they're called hypotheses, not inspiration and not revelation.
Dr. Arroway in Carl Sagan's Contact p. 162
• What I'm saying is, if God wanted to
send us a message, and ancient writings were the only way he could
think of doing it, he could have done a better job.
Dr. Arroway in Carl Sagan's Contact p. 164
• Anything you don't understand,
Mr. Rankin, you attribute to God. God for you is where you sweep
away all the mysteries of the world, all the challenges to our intelligence.
You simply turn your mind off and say God did it.
Dr. Arroway in Carl Sagan's Contact p. 166
• The question [Do you
believe in God?] has a peculiar structure. If I say no, do I mean
I'm convinced God doesn't exist, or do I mean I'm not convinced
he does exist? Those are two very different questions.
Dr. Arroway in Carl Sagan's Contact p. 168
• You see, the religious
people – most of them – really think this planet is
an experiment. That's what their beliefs come down to. Some god
or other is always fixing and poking, messing around with tradesmen's
wives, giving tablets on mountains, commanding you to mutilate your
children, telling people what words they can say and what words
they can't say, making people feel guilty about enjoying themselves,
and like that. Why can't the gods leave well enough alone? All this
intervention speaks of incompetence. If God didn't want Lot's wife
to look back, why didn't he make her obedient, so she'd do what
her husband told her? Or if he hadn't made Lot such a shithead,
maybe she would've listened to him more. If God is omnipotent and
omniscient, why didn't he start the universe out in the first place
so it would come out the way he wants? Why's he constantly repairing
and complaining? No, there's one thing the Bible makes clear: The
biblical God is a sloppy manufacturer. He's not good at design,
he's not good at execution. He'd be out of business if there was
any competition.
Sol Hadden in Carl Sagan's Contact p. 285
• The Earth is an object
lesson for the apprentice gods. 'If you really screw up,' they get
told, 'you'll make something like Earth.'
Dr. Arroway in Carl Sagan's Contact p. 286
• Part of my message is
that we're not central to the purpose of the Cosmos. What happened
to me makes us all seem very small.
Dr. Arroway in Carl Sagan's Contact p. 420
• (When asked merely if
they accept evolution, 45 percent of Americans say yes. The figure
is 70 percent in China.) When the movie Jurassic Park was shown
in Israel, it was condemned by some Orthodox rabbis because it accepted
evolution and because it taught that dinosaurs lived a hundred million
years ago–when, as is plainly stated at every Rosh Hashonhan
and every Jewish wedding ceremony, the Universe is less than 6,000
years old.
The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark, p.
325
• I would love to believe
that when I die I will live again, that some thinking, feeling,
remembering part of me will continue. But much as I want to believe
that, and despite the ancient and worldwide cultural traditions
that assert an afterlife, I know of nothing to suggest that it is
more than wishful thinking. The world is so exquisite with so much
love and moral depth, that there is no reason to deceive ourselves
with pretty stories for which there's little good evidence. Far
better it seems to me, in our vulnerability, is to look death in
the eye and to be grateful every day for the brief but magnificent
opportunity that life provides.
1996 in his article In the Valley of the Shadow Parade Magazine
Also, Billions and Billions p. 215
• The politicians and
the religious leaders and the weapons scientists have been at it
for a long time and they've made a thorough mess of it. I mean,
we're in deep trouble.
A&E Biography interview
• Life is but a momentary
glimpse of the wonder of this astonishing universe, and it is sad
to see so many dreaming it away on spiritual fantasy.
• In many cultures it is
customary to answer that God created the universe out of nothing.
But this is mere temporizing. If we wish courageously to pursue
the question, we must, of course ask next where God comes from?
And if we decide this to be unanswerable, why not save a step and
conclude that the universe has always existed?
Cosmos, page 257
• Skeptical scrutiny is
the means, in both science and religion, by which deep thoughts
can be winnowed from deep nonsense.
• Many statements about
God are confidently made by theologians on grounds that today at
least sound specious. Thomas Aquinas claimed to prove that God cannot
make another God, or commit suicide, or make a man without a soul,
or even make a triangle whose interior angles do not equal 180 degrees.
But Bolyai and Lobachevsky were able to accomplish this last feat
(on a curved surface) in the nineteenth century, and they were not
even approximately gods.
Broca's Brain
• We should be teaching
our children the scientific method and the reasons for a Bill of
Rights. With it comes a certain decency, humility and community
spirit.
• One prominent American
religion confidently predicted that the world would end in 1914.
Well, 1914 has come and gone, and – whole the events of that
year were certainly of some importance – the world did not,
at least so far as I can see, seem to have ended. There are at least
three responses that an organized religion can make in the face
of such a failed and fundamental prophecy. They could have said,
Oh, did we say '1914'? So sorry, we meant '2014'. A slight error
in calculation. Hope you weren't inconvinenced in any way. But they
did not. They could have said, Well, the world would have ended,
except we prayed very hard and interceded with God so He spared
the Earth. But they did not. Instead, the did something much more
ingenious. They announced that the world had in fact ended in 1914,
and if the rest of us hadn't noticed, that was our lookout. It is
astonishing in the fact of such transparent evasions that this religion
has any adherents at all. But religions are tough. Either they make
no contentions which are subject to disproof or they quickly redesign
doctrine after disproof. The fact that religions can be so shamelessly
dishonest, so contemptuous of the intelligence of their adherents,
and still flourish does not speak very well for the tough- mindedness
of the believers. But it does indicate, if a demonstration was needed,
that near the core of the religious experience is something remarkably
resistant to rational inquiry.
Broca's Brain
• It means nothing to
be open to a proposition we don't understand.
• There are many hypotheses
in science which are wrong. That's perfectly all right; they're
the aperture to finding out what's right. Science is a self-correcting
process. To be accepted, new ideas must survive the most rigorous
standards of evidence and scrutiny.
Cosmos television series
• I worry that, especially
as the Millennium edges nearer, pseudoscience and superstition will
seem year by year more tempting, the siren song of unreason more
sonorous and attractive. Where have we heard it before? Whenever
our ethnic or national prejudices are aroused, in times of scarcity,
during challenges to national self-esteem or nerve, when we agonize
about our diminished cosmic place and purpose, or when fanaticism
is bubbling up around us-then, habits of thought familiar from ages
past reach for the controls. The candle flame gutters. Its little
pool of light trembles. Darkness gathers. The demons begin to stir.
The Demon-Haunted World: Science As a Candle in the Dark
• If we're capable of conjuring
up terrifying monsters in childhood, why shouldn't some of us, at
least on occasion, be able to fantasize something similar, something
truly horrifying, a shared delusion, as adults? The Demon
Haunted World
• If some good evidence
for life after death were announced, I'd be eager to examine it;
but it would have to be real scientific data, not mere anecdote.
As with the face on Mars and alien abductions, better the hard truth,
I say, than the comforting fantasy.
The Demon-Haunted World
• If you want to save your
child from polio, you can pray or you can inoculate....Try science.
The Demon-Haunted World
• Since World War II, Japan
has spawned enormous numbers of new religions featuring the supernatural....
In Thailand, diseases are treated with pills manufactured from pulverized
sacred Scripture. Witches are today being burned in South Africa....
The worldwide TM [Transcendental Meditation] organization has an
estimated valuation of $3 billion. For a fee, they promise to make
you invisible, to enable you to fly.
The Demon-Haunted World
• In Italy, the Inquisition
was condemning people to death until the end of the eighteenth century,
and inquisitional torture was not abolished in the Catholic Church
until 1816. The last bastion of support for the reality of witchcraft
and the necessity of punishment has been the Christian churches.
The Demon-Haunted World
<TOP> |
| |
• I am not afraid of death,
I just don't want to be there when it happens.
Without Feathers, 1976
• I was thrown out of college
for cheating on the metaphysics exam; I looked into the soul of
the boy sitting next to me.
Annie Hall
• To you I'm an atheist;
to God, I'm the Loyal Opposition.
Stardust Memories, 1980
• I don't believe in afterlife, although I am bringing a change
of underwear.
Getting Even
• Not only is there no God, but try getting
a plumber on weekends.
New Yorker, 'My Philosophy'
• I'm astounded by people
who want to 'know' the universe when it's hard enough to find your
way around Chinatown.
• How can I believe in God when just last week I got my tongue
caught in the roller of an electric typewriter?
• If only God would give me some clear sign! Like making a
large deposit in my name at a Swiss bank.
<TOP> |
|
What history shows is that science is very
demanding and does not blindly accept any new idea that someone
can come up with. New claims must be thoroughly supported by the
data, especially when they may conflict with well-established knowledge.
Any research scientist will tell you how very difficult it is to
discover new knowledge, convince your colleagues that it is correct–as
they enthusiastically play devil's advocate–and then get your
results through the peer-review process to publication. When scientists
express their objections to claims such as evidence for intelligent
design in the universe, they are not being dogmatic. They are simply
applying the same standard they would for any other extraordinary
claim and demanding extraordinary evidence.
Besides, why would any scientist object to the notion of intelligent
design or other supernatural phenomena, should the data warrant
that they deserve attention? Most scientists would be delighted
at the opening up of an exciting new field of study that would undoubtedly
receive generous funding. As we will see, intelligent design, in
its current form, simply incorporates neither the evidence nor the
theoretical arguments to warrant such attention.
Furthermore, the assertions that science does not study the supernatural
and that supernatural hypotheses are untestable are factually incorrect.
Right under the noses of the leaders who make these public statements,
capable, credentialed scientists are investigating the possibility
of supernatural causes. As we will discuss in a later chapter, reputable
institutions such as the Mayo Clinic, Harvard University, and Duke
University are studying phenomena that, if verified, would provide
strong empirical support for the existence of some nonmaterial element
in the universe. These experiments are designed to test the healing
power of distant, blinded intercessory prayer. Their results have
been published in peer-reviwed medical journals.
God: The Failed Hypothesis
Any attempt at understanding humanity must
include an explanation of the hold that supernatural belief continues
to have on most of the human race.
Physics and Psychics (1990) ch. 3
Thought, without the data on which to structure
that thought, leads nowhere.
Has Science Found God? (draft: 2001) ch. 1
When people start using science to argue for
their specific beliefs and delusions, to try to claim that they're
supported by science, then scientists at least have to speak up
and say, "You're welcome to your delusions, but don't say that
they're supported by science."
"Interview with Particle Physicist Victor J Stenger,"
Positive Atheism (December 1998, January 1999, and February 1999)
A scenario is suggested by which the universe
and its laws could have arisen naturally from "nothing."
Current cosmology suggests that no laws of physics were violated
in bringing the universe into existence. The laws of physics themselves
are shown to correspond to what one would expect if the universe
appeared from nothing. There is something rather than nothing because
something is more stable.
preliminary summary for the forthcoming book, Why Is There Something
Rather Than Nothing? The Self-Contained Universe
Scientific evidence for God's existence is
being claimed today by theists, many of whom carry respectable scientific
or philosophical credentials. "He" who is neither a "she"
nor an "it" supposedly answers prayers and otherwise dramatically
affects the outcome of events. If these consequences are as significant
as believers say, then the effects should be detectable in properly
controlled experiments.
Has Science Found God? (draft: 2001), ch. 3
Scientists have practical reasons for wishing
that religion and science be kept separate. They can see nothing
but trouble ... if they venture into the deeply divisive issue of
religion – especially when their results tend to support a
highly unpopular, atheistic conclusion.
Has Science Found God? (draft: 2001), ch. 3
People are entitled to their opinions, but
when the opinion is in disagreement with the data – with the
facts – when that opinion does not stand up under critical
or rational scrutiny, I think we have a right to point that out.
We shouldn't be stepping on anybody's toes when we do that. If they're
going to be spouting off nonsense, then we should say that –
not as a matter of opinion, but as a matter of scientific fact.
When someone says science says something, and science doesn't say
something ("It doesn't say that! That's a misrepresentation
of what science says."), then I think we can state that. And
if it ruffles some feathers, so what? I just don't see the basis
for arguing that creationism has equal standing with evolution.
"Interview with Particle Physicist Victor J Stenger,"
Positive Atheism (December 1998, January 1999, and February 1999)
From this experience, I have learned what
science asks of us when we claim the existence of an extraordinary
new phenomenon. It requires much, including years of hard work,
uncompromising honesty, and willingness to accept failure. I can
quickly recognize fallacious logic or faulty experimental procedure
when I read a paper that purports to observe something that goes
beyond existing knowledge. I am dubious and suspicious whenever
an important result has been obtained too easily or too quickly,
and reported in the media before it has run the gamut of critical
review by disinterested, knowledgeable parties.
Has Science Found God? (draft: 2001)
If it looks like God does not exist, quacks
like God does not exist, then there is a good chance he does not....
Proof is not required to believe. But some sign, some evidence is
needed. None exists....
Find some inkling of evidence. There is none.
on his list, AVOID_L, November 5, 2001
"Where did all the matter come from?"
E = mc^2 says matter and energy are the same entity. Since E = 0,
the total matter of the universe is zero. Zero does not have to
come from anything.
Now, if by "matter" you just mean the equivalent of rest
energy, then that came from gravitational energy during the expansion
in the early universe.
response to having been asked for a simple explanation to the
question, "Where did all the matter come from?" in a letter
to Cliff Walker (September 13, 2001)
We are only devoted to science as the best
means humans have developed, so far, for arriving at an approximation
to the truth about objective reality – whatever that truth
may be. We are not closed minded against psi, religion, alternative
medicine, or any paranormal claims nor prejudiced against any individual
adherent. Show us the evidence and we will consider it, but only
steadfastly insisting on the same rules that we would apply to evidence
for a new particle or a new drug. In particular, we refuse to agree
to adopting new criteria ... just for the benefit of researchers
in a field of study that cannot seem to get significant results
any other way.
Has Science Found God? (draft: 2001) chapter 10
I am not one of those who think that science
has nothing to say about ultimate origins. I will try to show that
it has a lot to say, although what it does say is not always directly
subject to the empirical testing that characterizes conventional
scientific statements. Nevertheless, we have theories of physics
and cosmology that are already well-established by their success
in meeting the challenge of severe empirical testing against existing
data. We have every right to logically extrapolate those theories
into the gaps where empirical data are currently not available,
and may indeed never be. Those extrapolations can turn out to be
misdirected, so they should not be treated as scientifically established
facts. At the very least, however, they can serve to develop possible
scenarios by which the gaps in current knowledge might plausibly
be filled by natural explanations, thus refuting any assertions
that a supernatural explanation is required by the data.
Has Science Found God? (draft: 2001) ch. 4
I do not think science has to make any apologies.
It looks at the world and tells it like it is. And we all live longer,
better lives because of this dispassionate view. Sure, it commands
awe and provides inspiration. Still, I would rather be operated
on by a surgeon who sees me as an assemblage of atoms than one who
lovingly tries to manipulate what he or she imagines are my vital
energy fields.
Has Science Found God? (draft: 2001) ch. 6
While science continually uncovers new mysteries,
it has removed much of what was once regarded as deeply mysterious.
Although we certainly do not know the exact nature of every component
of the universe, the basic principles of physics seem to apply out
to the farthest horizon visible to us today.
Has Science Found God? (draft: 2001) ch. 6
Altnerative explanations are always welcome
in science, if they are better and explain more. Alternative explanations
that explain nothing are not welcome....
Note how science changed those beliefs when new data became available.
Relgions stick to the same ancient beliefs regardless of the data.
responding to someone on his list, AVOID_L, November 5, 2001
The battle over the validity of evolution
has been publicly posed as a scientific one. However, you will find
little sign of it in scientific journals, where such quarrels as
exist are over details, not the basic concept.... Evolution has
proved so useful as a paradigm for the origin and structure of life
that it constitutes the foundation of the sciences of biology and
medicine.
Has Science Found God? (draft: 2001)
In the United States, the new creationist
movement has convinced many people and their political servants
that scientists are being unfair in not supporting the teaching
of alternatives to evolution in science classes. They say it is
censorship to exclude intelligent design from those classes. The
usual argument raised against teaching intelligent design is that
it unconstitutionally promotes religion. Design promoters, however,
insist that they have no particular designer in mind. No one believes
them, but skilled lawyers arguing for the cause of impartiality
on their behalf could probably prevail in court. In any case, a
better argument exists: Intelligent design theory, as currently
formulated by its leading proponents, should not be taught in science
classes because it is provably wrong.
Has Science Found God? (draft: 2001), ch. 4
People have a hard time imagining how the
universe can possibly have come about by anything other than a miracle,
a violation of natural law. The intuition being expressed here is
at least twofold: First, it is widely believed that something cannot
come from nothing, where that "something" refers to the
substance of the universe -- its matter and energy -- and "nothing"
can be interpreted in this context as a state of zero energy and
mass. Second, it is also widely believed that the way in which the
substance of the universe seems to be structured in an orderly fashion,
rather than simply being randomly distributed, could not have happened
except by design.
Has Science Found God? (draft: 2001), ch. 6
To most theistic believers, human life can
have no meaning in a universe without God. Quite sincerely, and
with understandable yearning for a meaning to their existence, they
reject the possibility of no God. In their minds, only a purposeful
universe based on God is possible and science can do nothing else
but support this "truth."
Has Science Found God? (draft: 2001)
The argument from design rests on the notion
that everything, but God, must come from something. However, once
you agree that it is logically possible for an entity to exist that
was not itself created, namely God, then that entity can just as
well be the universe itself. Indeed, this is a more economical possibility,
not requiring the additional hypothesis of a supernatural power
outside the universe....
... To [creationists], it is not a matter of logic anyway, but common
sense. They see no way that the universe could have just happened,
without intent. "How can something come from nothing?"
they continue to ask, never wondering how God came from nothing.
Has Science Found God? (2001), ch. 3
The argument from design stands or falls on
whether it can be demonstrated that some aspect of the universe
such as its origin or biological life could not have come about
naturally. The burden of proof is ... on the supernaturalist to
demonstrate that something from outside nature must be introduced
to explain the data.
Has Science Found God? (draft: 2001), ch. 4
In short, evolution is as close to being a
scientific fact as is possible for any theory, given that science
is open-ended and no one can predict with certainty what may change
in the future. The prospect that evolution by natural selection,
at least as a broad mechanism, will be overthrown in the future
is about as likely as the prospect of finding out some day that
the Earth is really flat. Unfortunately, those who regard these
scientific facts as a threat to faith have chosen to distort and
misrepresent them to the public.
Has Science Found God? (draft: 2001), ch. 2
It was not that I thought I was smarter. I
had simply explored science and found what seemed to me a far more
powerful authority. And, I did not steal or murder because I thought
they were wrong, not because I feared damnation.
Has Science Found God? (draft: 2001), Preface
Define self-awareness and tell me what it
is about it that requires something more than a material explanation.
I do not accept the burden of explaining all phenomena, real or
imagined. If you think more than matter is required for this thing
you call self-awareness, which you have not defined, then you have
the burden of showing why.
responding to the question, "What is your preferred parsimonious
explanation for the fact of self-awareness? Most of the hypotheses
offered to explain consciousness seem to me to fail the parsimony
test. None seems satisfactory. How oxygen, carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen,
calcium, phosphorus, potassium, sulphur, sodium, chlorine, fluorine,
magnesium, iron, manganese, silicon, iodine, and a few other trace
elements ever interact to become self-aware seems to me the most
important question in all of the debates about the nature of creation."
on his list, AVOID_L, October 18, 2001
Any strategy that attempts to reinforce faith
by undermining science is also doomed to failure. Showing that some
scientific theory is wrong will not prove that the religious alternative
is correct by default. When the sun was shown not to be the center
of the universe, as Copernicus had proposed, the Earth was not moved
back to that singular position in the cosmos. If Darwinian evolution
is proved wrong, biologists will not develop a new theory based
on the hypothesis that each species was created separately by God
6,000 years ago.
Has Science Found God? (draft: 2001), Preface
The belief in supernatural forces remains
to this day a yoke on the neck of humanity, but at least Thales
made it possible, for those of us who wish it, to be free of that
yoke.
Physics and Psychics (1990) p. 83. Thales (625?-546? BCE) was
a Greek philosopher who was the first to posit a godless universe
that runs entirely on natural laws.
But, as we have seen, movement does not require
a mover, and modern quantum mechanics has shown that not all effects
require a cause. And even if they did, why would the Prime Mover
need to be a supernatural anthropomorphic deity such as the Judaeo-Christian
God? Why could it not just as well be the material universe itself?
discussing Aquinas's adaptation of Aristotle's ideas as "proof"
of the existence of God, Physics and Psychics (1990) p. 88
Most people in Bayonne, like folks in similar
towns across the country, had little education and could neither
verbalize nor intellectualize their problems very well. They just
suffered them. They listened eagerly when the priests promised them
everlasting life in paradise, where they would be reunited with
their departed love ones, but this was not enough when the suffering
and guilt were unbearable.
The parish priests did their best and I fault them little. They
operated within a framework developed over centuries that would
not have survived this long if it did not give people something
they wanted, no matter how insufficient....
My father ... remained a Catholic and always expressed belief in
God. He did not argue with me about my views – although he
and other older relatives often told me to keep my mouth shut....
While they succeeded in keeping me from expressing my thoughts too
openly, they had no effect on those thoughts. As long as I kept
my mouth shut, they left me alone.
on life growing up in New Jersey, in Has Science Found God?
(draft: 2001), ch. 1
And, yet again, because I can predict the
line of criticism that this book will generate, I need to make it
clear up-front that I am not claiming that the absence of evidence
eliminates all possibilities for a god to exist in every conceivable
form. And, I am not evaluating all the theological and philosophical
arguments for or against God. I am simply evaluating the scientific
arguments and claimed scientific evidence for a deity according
to the same criteria that science applies to any extraordinary claim.
I conclude that, so far, they fail to meet the test.
Has Science Found God? (draft: 2001)
Fifteen years of skepticism has done more
for me than 20 years of force-fed religion and 30 years of indifference
in between.
on his list, AVOID_L, November 5, 2001
<TOP> |
|
• Any hope that America would finally
grow up vanished with the rise of fundamentalist Christianity. Fundamentalism,
with its born-again regression, its pink-and-gold concept of heaven,
its literal-mindedness, its rambunctious good cheer ... its anti-intellectualism
... its puerile hymns ... and its faith-healing ... are made to
order for King Kid America.
Reflections in a Jaundiced Eye, Good King Herod (1989)
• American couples have gone to such
lengths to avoid the interference of in-laws that they have to pay
marriage counselors to interfere between them.
• Americans worship creativity the way they worship physical
beauty - as a way of enjoying elitism without guilt: God did it.
• Chinks in America's egalitarian armor are not hard to find.
Democracy is the fig leaf of elitism.
• During the feminist seventies men were caught between a
rock and a hard-on; in the fathering eighties they are caught between
good hugs and bad hugs.
• Now the only thing I miss about sex is the cigarette afterward.
Next to the first one in the morning, it's the best one of all.
It tasted so good that even if I had been frigid I would have pretended
otherwise just to be able to smoke it.
• Owning your own home is America's unique recipe for avoiding
revolution and promoting pseudo-equality at the same time.
• People are so busy dreaming the American Dream, fantasizing
about what they could be or have a right to be, that they're all
asleep at the switch. Consequently we are living in the Age of Human
Error.
• Self-help books are making life downright unsafe. Women
desperate to catch a man practice all the ploys recommended by these
authors. Bump into him, trip over him, knock him down, spill something
on him, scald him, but meet him.
• Showing up at school already able to read is like showing
up at the undertaker's already embalmed: people start worrying about
being put out of their jobs.
• The witty woman is a tragic figure in American life. Wit
destroys eroticism and eroticism destroys wit, so women must choose
between taking lovers and taking no prisoners.
• Those colorful denizens of male despair, the Bowery bum
and the rail-riding hobo, have been replaced by the bag lady and
the welfare mother. Women have even taken over Skid Row.
• True nostalgia is an ephemeral composition of disjointed
memories.
<TOP> |
| |
• I would never want to
be a member of a group whose symbol was a guy nailed to two pieces
of wood.
A Place For My Stuff
• We created god in our
own image and likeness!
• I credit that eight years
of grammar school with nourishing me in a direction where I could
trust myself and trust my instincts. They gave me the tools to reject
my faith. They taught me to question and think for myself and to
believe in my instincts to such an extent that I just said, 'This
is a wonderful fairy tale they have going here, but it's not for
me.'
New York Times, 20 August 1995, pg. 17.
(He
attended Cardinal Hayes High School in the Bronx, but left during
his sophomore year in 1952 and never went back to school. Before
that he attended a Catholic grammar school, Corpus Christi, which
he called an experimental school.).
• If churches want to play
the game of politics, let them pay admission like everyone else
What Am I Doing In New Jersey?
• This is a lttle prayer
dedicated to the separation of church and state. I guess if they
are going to force those kids to pray in schools they might as well
have a nice prayer like this: Our Father who art in heaven, and
to the republic for which it stands, thy kingdom come, one nation
indivisible as in heaven, give us this day as we forgive those who
so proudly we hail. Crown thy good into temptation but deliver us
from the twilight's last gleaming. Amen and Awomen.
Saturday Night Live
• I'm completely in favor
of the separation of Church and State. My idea is that these two
institutions screw us up enough on their own, so both of them together
is certain death.
• Religion convinced the
world that there's an invisible man in the sky who watches everything
you do. And there's 10 things he doesn't want you to do or else
you'll to to a burning place with a lake of fire until the end of
eternity. But he loves you! ...And he needs money! He's all powerful,
but he can't handle money!
You Are All Diseased
• The only good thing ever
to come out of religion was the music.
Brain Droppings
• I've begun worshipping
the sun for a number of reasons. First of all, unlike some other
gods I could mention, I can see the sun. It's there for me every
day. And the things it brings me are quite apparent all the time:
heat, light, food, a lovely day. There's no mystery, no one asks
for money, I don't have to dress up, and there's no boring pageantry.
And interestingly enough, I have found that the prayers I offer
to the sun and the prayers I formerly offered to God are all answered
at about the same 50-percent rate.
You Are All Diseased
•A man came up to me on
the street and said I used to be messed up out of my mind on drugs
but now I'm messed up out of my mind on Jeeesus Chriiist.
• I have as much authority
as the pope, I just don't have as many people who believe it.
Brain Droppings
• Jesus was a cross dresser
Brain Droppings
• I finally accepted Jesus.
not as my personal savior, but as a man I intend to borrow money
from.
Brain Droppings
• Instead of school busing
and prayer in schools, which are both controversial, why not a joint
solution? Prayer in buses. Just drive these kids around all day
and let them pray their fuckn' empty little heads off.
Brain Droppings
• When it comes to BULLSHIT...BIG-TIME,
MAJOR LEAGUE BULLSHIT... you have to stand IN AWE, IN AWE of the
all time champion of false promises and exaggerated claims, religion.
You Are All Diseased
• Religion easily has the
greatest bullshit story ever told. Think about it, religion has
actually convinced people that there's an INVISIBLE MAN...LIVING
IN THE SKY...who watches every thing you do, every minute of every
day. And the invisible man has a list of ten special things that
he does not want you to do. And if you do any of these ten things,
he has a special place full of fire and smoke and burning and torture
and anguish where he will send to live and suffer and burn and choke
and scream and cry for ever and ever 'til the end of time...but
he loves you.
You Are All Diseased
• I want you to know, when
it comes to believing in god- I really tried. I really really tried.
I tried to believe that there is a god who created each one of us
in his own image and likeness, loves us very much and keeps a close
eye on things. I really tried to believe that, but I gotta tell
you, the longer you live, the more you look around, the more you
realize...something is FUCKED-UP. Something is WRONG here. War,
disease, death, destruction, hunger, filth, poverty, torture, crime,
corruption and the Ice Capades. Something is definitely wrong. This
is NOT good work. If this is the best god can do, I am NOT impressed.
Results like these do not belong on the resume of a supreme being.
This is the kind of shit you'd expect from an office temp with a
bad attitude. And just between you and me, in any decently run universe,
this guy would have been out on his all-powerful-ass a long time
ago.
You Are All Diseased
• Trillions and trillions
of prayers every day asking and begging and pleading for favors.
'Do this' 'Gimme that' 'I want a new car' 'I want a better job'.
And most of this praying takes place on Sunday. And I say fine,
pray for anything you want. Pray for anything. But...what about
the divine plan? Remember that? The divine plan. Long time ago god
made a divine plan. Gave it a lot of thought. Decided it was a good
plan. Put it into practice. And for billion and billions of years
the divine plan has been doing just fine. Now you come along and
pray for something. Well, suppose the thing you want isn't in god's
divine plan. What do you want him to do? Change his plan? Just for
you? Doesn't it seem a little arrogant? It's a divine plan. What's
the use of being god if every run-down schmuck with a two dollar
prayer book can come along and fuck up your plan? And here's something
else, another problem you might have; suppose your prayers aren't
answered. What do you say? 'Well it's god's will. God's will be
done.' Fine, but if it gods will and he's going to do whatever he
wants to anyway; why the fuck bother praying in the first place?
Seems like a big waste of time to me. Couldn't you just skip the
praying part and get right to his will?
You Are All Diseased
• You know who I pray to?
Joe Pesci. Joe Pesci. Two reasons; first of all, I think he's a
good actor. Ok. To me, that counts. Second; he looks like a guy
who can get things done. Joe Pesci doesn't fuck around. Doesn't
fuck around. In fact, Joe Pesci came through on a couple of things
that god was having trouble with. For years I asked god to do something
about my noisy neighbor with the barking dog. Joe Pesci straightened
that cock-sucker out with one visit.
You Are All Diseased
• I noticed that of all
the prayers I used to offer to god, and all the prayers that I now
offer to Joe Pesci, are being answer at about the same 50% rate.
Half the time I get what I want. Half the time I don't. Same as
god 50/50. Same as the four leaf clover, the horse shoe, the rabbit's
foot, and the wishing well. Same as the mojo man. Same as the voodoo
lady who tells your fortune by squeezing the goat's testicles. It's
all the same; 50/50. So just pick your superstitions, sit back,
make a wish and enjoy yourself. And for those of you that look to
the Bible for it's literary qualities and moral lessons; I got a
couple other stories I might like to recommend for you. You might
enjoy The Three Little Pigs. That's a good one. It has a nice happy
ending. Then there's Little Red Riding Hood. Although it does have
that one x-rated part where the Big-Bad-Wolf actually eats the grandmother.
Which I didn't care for, by the way. And finally, I've always drawn
a great deal of moral comfort from Humpty Dumpty. The part I liked
best: ...and all the king's horses, and all the king's men couldn't
put Humpty together again. That's because there is no Humpty Dumpty,
and there is no god. None. Not one. Never was. No god.
You Are All Diseased
• Religion is sort of like
a lift in your shoes. If it makes you feel better, fine. Just don't
ask me to wear your shoes.
• Here's another question
I've been pondering- What is all this shit about Angels? Have you
herd this? 3 out of 4 people belive in Angels. Are you FUCKING STUPID?
Has everybody lost their mind? You know what I think it is? I think
it's a massive, collective, psychotic chemical flashback for all
the drugs smoked, swallowed, shot, and obsorbed rectally by all
Americans from 1960 to 1990. 30 years of street drugs will get you
some fucking Angels my friend!
You Are All Diseased
• What about Goblins, huh?
Doesn't anybody belive in Goblins? You never hear about this.. Except
on Halloween and then it's all negative shit. And what about Zombies?
You never hear from Zombies! That's the trouble with Zombies, they're
unreliable! I say if you're going to go for the Angel bullshit you
might as well go for the Zombie package as well..
You Are All Diseased
<TOP> |
|
• The official religions and patriotic
fervor of many states make their troops willing to fight suicidally.
The latter willingness is one so strongly programmed into us citizens
of modern states, by our schools and churches and governments, that
we forget what a radical break it makes with previous human history.
.... Naturally, what makes patriotic and religious fanatics such
dangerous opponents is not the deaths of the fanatics themselves,
but their willingness to accept the deaths of a fraction of their
number in order to annihilate or crush their infidel enemy. Fanaticism
in war, of the type that drove recorded Christian and Islamic conquests,
was probably unknown on Earth until chiefdoms and especially states
emerged within the last 6,000 years.
• AIDS and malaria and TB are national
security issues. A worldwide program to get a start on dealing with
these issues would cost about $25 billion... It's, what, a few months
in Iraq.
• All human societies go through fads
in which they temporarily either adopt practices of little use or
else abandon practices of considerable use.
• Biology is the science. Evolution
is the concept that makes biology unique.
• I'd rather spend my leisure time doing
what some people call my work and I call my fun.
• Introspection and preserved writings
give us far more insight into the ways of past humans than we have
into the ways of past dinosaurs. For that reason, I'm optimistic
that we can eventually arrive at convincing explanations for these
broadest patterns of human history.
• Native Americans had only stone and
wooden weapons and no animals that could be ridden. Those military
advantages repeatedly enabled troops of a few dozen mounted Spaniards
to defeat Indian armies numbering in the thousands.
<TOP> |
| |

• The
concern of today isn't communism, it's moving America toward a
fascist theocracy.
• Children
are naïve -- they trust everyone. School is bad enough, but,
if you put a child anywhere in the vicinity of a church, you're
asking for trouble.
• There
is no hell. There is only France.
• The
other factor that people forget about the southern region is the
amount of inter-marriage that has already occurred there, and so
there are certain genetic defects come to the fore when you have
a large inter-marriage population. That means regression .... And
in fact Utah is another state, which is basically owned by the Mormon
church, which also has a lot of inter-marriage and because this
type of inter-marriage there is a large proportion of blind people
in Utah. That's why when you go across the street, instead of just
a stop light that you can see, they have stop lights that make a
coo-coo noise to tell you when to cross the street- that's true!
• Tax
the FUCK out of the churches!
• Fact
of the matter is, there is no hip world, there is no straight world.
There's a world, you see, which has people in it who believe in
a variety of different things. Everybody believes in something and
everybody, by virtue of the fact that they believe in something,
use that something to support their own existence.
• My
best advice to anyone who wants to raise a happy, mentally healthy
child is: Keep him or her as far away from a church as you can.
•
So, when Adam and Eve were in the Garden
of Eden, if you go for all these fairy tales, that "evil"
woman convinced the man to eat the apple, but the apple came from
the Tree of Knowledge. And the punishment that was then handed down,
the woman gets to bleed and the guy's got to go to work, is the
result of a man desiring, because his woman suggested that it would
be a good idea, that he get all the knowledge that was supposedly
the property and domain of God. So, that right away sets up Christianity
as an anti-intellectual religion. You never want to be that smart.
If you're a woman, it's going to be running down your leg, and if
you're a guy, you're going to be in the salt mines for the rest
of your life. So, just be a dumb fuck and you'll all go to heaven.
That's the subtext of Christianity.
• If
you want to get together in any exclusive situation and have people
love you, fine - but to hang all this desperate sociology on the
idea of The Cloud-Guy who has The Big Book, who knows if you've
been bad or good - and CARES about any of it - to hang it all on
that, folks, is the chimpanzee part of the brain working.
<TOP> |
|

• Life
is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans.
• Reality
leaves a lot to the imagination.
• Our society
is run by insane people for insane objectives. I think we're being
run by maniacs for maniacal ends and I think I'm liable to be put
away as insane for expressing that. That's what's insane about it.
• Everything
is clearer when you're in love.
• A dream
you dream alone is only a dream. A dream you dream together is reality.
• You don't
need anybody to tell you who you are or what you are. You are what
you are!
• I'm not
going to change the way I look or the way I feel to conform to anything.
I've always been a freak. So I've been a freak all my life and I
have to live with that, you know. I'm one of those people.
• If everyone
demanded peace instead of another television set, then there'd be
peace.
• You're
in a fishbowl so make use of it, man.
• When you're
drowning, you don't say 'I would be incredibly pleased if someone
would have the foresight to notice me drowning and come and help
me,' you just scream.
• I believe
in God, but not as one thing, not as an old man in the sky. I believe
that what people call God is something in all of us. I believe that
what Jesus and Mohammed and Buddha and all the rest said was right.
It's just that the translations have gone wrong.
• God is
a concept,
By which we can measure,
Our pain,
I'll say it again,
God is a concept,
By which we can measure,
Our pain,
I don't believe in magic,
I don't believe in I-ching,
I don't believe in bible,
I don't believe in tarot,
I don't believe in Hitler,
I don't believe in Jesus,
I don't believe in Kennedy,
I don't believe in Buddha,
I don't believe in mantra,
I don't believe in Gita,
I don't believe in yoga,
I don't believe in kings,
I don't believe in Elvis,
I don't believe in Zimmerman,
I don't believe in Beatles,
I just believe in me...
<TOP> |
|

• Is it appropriate to teach Intelligent Design
(ID) in biology class? Is ID a legitimate scientific theory?
To answer the second question first, I don’t
think that it is. I think that any supposed science that appeals
to causes that are non-natural is not a science as we understand
the concept today – and incidentally as people understood
it in the past. Of course, one might say that the intelligent
designer is not necessarily non-natural, but then what or who
is he/her? An extra-terrestrial? Obviously it is God or a god,
and hence is non-natural.
Now to answer the first question, I do not think it appropriate
to teach non-science in a biology class – especially non-science
that is really a form of literalist Christianity in disguise.
Even if it were appropriate, I would not want the kind of conservative
evangelical religion taught, that I think ID represents. But it
is not appropriate and in the US is illegal.
Having said this, I would like to see comparative religion classes
in US high schools and would be happy to see ID and Creationism
generally taught as topics here – along with other forms
of Christianity, and Islam (in this day, I think this is very
important), and other world religions. But they would be taught
as topics and not as the truth.
• Now, for the first
time, one could confidently suspend belief in any kind of God.
The Natural development of organisms explains everything, most
especially adaptation. Even if you did not want to become a full-blown
atheist, you could become what Darwin's already mentioned supporter,
T.H. Huxley, labeled an 'agnostic', neither believer nor disbeliever
(Huxley, 1900). However, excluding or distancing God in this fashion
raises with some urgency the major problems of philosophy. If
God (perhaps) does not exist, wherein lie the guarantees of knowledge
and of truth? Possibly all is subjective illusion. If God does
not exist, wherein lies the force of morality? Why should we not
do precisely what we please, cheating and lying and stealing,
to serve our own ends? Dry answers by philosophers aiming for
purely secular answers tended not to convince.
Evolution destroyed the final foundations of traditional belief.
To many people, it was evolution that would provide the foundations
of a new belief-system. Evolution would lead to a deeper and truer
understanding of the problems of knowledge. Evolution would lead
to a deeper and true understanding of the nature of morality.
Thus were born (what are known now as) 'evolutionary epistemology'
and 'evolutionary ethics'.
Taking Darwin Seriously (1986) p.30
• I always find when
I meet creationists or non-evolutionists or critics or whatever,
I find it a lot easier to hate them in print than I do in person.
Speech at 'The New Antievolutionism' symposium February 13,1993
• It is probably because
I do have an intensely religious nature – using this term
in a secular sense, as one might apply it to other nonbelievers
like Thomas Henry Huxley – that I was attracted toward evolution.
Speaking in an entirely secular manner, I do not believe that
people come to evolution by chance. From Herbert Spencer (1892)
to Edward O. Wilson (1978), it has functioned as a kind of Weltanschauung,
a world picture which gives meaning to life. It is something that
acts as a foundation for the big questions which we humans face.
Yet, in those early years, this was not apparent to me –
at least, it was not a matter of great interest to me.
Zygon March 1994 p.26
|
| |
• The world and the universe
is an extremely beautiful place, and the more we understand about
it the more beautiful does it appear. It is an immensely exciting
experience to be born in the world, born in the universe, and look
around you and realize that before you die you have the opportunity
of understanding an immense amount about that world and about that
universe and about life and about why we're here. We have the opportunity
of understanding far, far more than any of our predecessors ever.
That is such an exciting possibility, it would be such a shame to
blow it and end your life not having understood what there is to
understand.
Said in an interview with Sheena McDonald
• You see, if you say something
positive like the whole of life - all living things- is descended
from a single common ancestor which lived about 4,000 million years
ago and that we are all cousins, well that is an exceedingly important
and true thing to say and that is what I want to say. Somebody who
is religious sees that as threatening and so I am represented as
attacking religion, and I am forced into responding to their reaction.
But you do not have to see my main purpose as attacking religion.
Certainly I see the scientific view of the world as incompatible
with religion, but that is not what is interesting about it. It
is also incompatible with magic, but that also is not worth stressing.
What is interesting about the scientific world view is that it is
true, inspiring, remarkable and that it unites a whole lot of phenomena
under a single heading. And that is what is so exciting for me.
Going the Whole Hog
<TOP>
Click
here for a page of quotes from The God Delusion |
|
• I'm
an atheist, but I have a great fascination with this issue –
over God and whether there is one or not. I come to [my belief]
personally for my own reasons and my own decisions. But I respect
anybody who believes anything, I don't have the ultimate answers
about anything.
Kenneth Souza interview for Big-O Magazine
• 'Halloween'
put me on the map, and I'm very sad to hear of his death.
• We have
all been beaten up in our careers, because horror is viewed as a
low-rent genre, just a notch or two above pornography. And while
it's true that we traffic in dark areas of violence and horror in
our profession, because we get everything out on the screen and
don't carry it around with us, we really are mostly nice guys.
• I've got
so much stuff in boxes at home, I could have five different museums.
• In England,
I'm a horror movie director. In Germany, I'm a filmmaker. In the
US, I'm a bum.
• What scares
me is what scares you. We're all afraid of the same things. That's
why horror is such a powerful genre. All you have to do is ask yourself
what frightens you and you'll know what frightens me.
<TOP> |
|
• Magic
is the art of creating false (but funny or beautiful) cause-and-effect
relationships. That's our area of expertise. When we do it on a
stage, the audience is fooled, but only for the moment, only in
the theater. They know they're watching a show. They know it's all
tricks. They do not go home and try to float in the air or catch
bullets in their teeth. [But] When we see scam artists peddling
false cause-and-effect as reality; when we see the tools of theater
and poetry used to victimize the vulnerable; when we sick people
submitting to "medical procedures" that belong in a Three
Stooges movie; all this enrages us.
• If there
existed even one psychic who had predicted that disaster, we'd be
very, very interested. But, nope. What haunts me about 9/11 is the
horrible knowledge that those who did the deed did it to further
the divine will. Whenever we hear a politician bless killing, we
should think twice.
<TOP> |
|

• The
very concept of sin comes from the bible. Christianity offers
to solve a problem of its own making! Would you be thankful to
a person who cut you with a knife in order to sell you a bandage?
Losing Faith in Faith
• How happy
can you be when you think every action and thought is being monitored
by a judgmental ghost?
Losing Faith in Faith
• You can
cite a hundred references to show that the biblical God is a bloodthirsty
tyrant, but if they can dig up two or three verses that say God
is love, they will claim that you are taking things out
of context!
Losing Faith in Faith
• I do understand
what love is, and that is one of the reasons I can never again be
a Christian. Love is not self denial. Love is not blood and suffering.
Love is not murdering your son to appease your own vanity. Love
is not hatred or wrath, consigning billions of people to eternal
torture because they have offended your ego or disobeyed your rules.
Love is not obedience, conformity, or submission. It is a counterfeit
love that iscontingent upon authority, punishment, or reward. True
love is respect and admiration, compassion and kindness, freely
given by a healthy, unafraid human being.
Losing Faith in Faith
• I have
something to say to the religionist who feels atheists never say
anything positive: You are an intelligent human being. Your life
is valuable for its own sake. You are not second-class in the universe,
deriving meaning and purpose from some other mind. You are not inherently
evil--you are inherently human, possessing the positive rational
potential to help make this a world of morality, peace and joy.
Trust yourself.
Losing Faith in Faith
• There
is joy in rationality, happiness in clarity of mind. Freethought
is thrilling and fulfilling–absolutely essential to mental
health and happiness.
Losing Faith in Faith
• It's not
easy to change world views. Faith has its own momentum and belief
is comfortable. To restructure reality is traumatic and scary. That
is why many intelligent people continue to believe: unbelief is
an unknown.
Losing Faith in Faith
• For my
money, I'll bet on reason and humanistic kindness. Even if I am
wrong I will have enjoyed my life, the existence of which is under
little dispute.
Losing Faith in Faith
• The longer
I have been an atheist, the more amazed I am that I ever believed
Christian notions.
Losing Faith in Faith
• Not thinking
critically, I assumed that the successful prayers were proof that
God answers prayer while the failures were proof that there was
something wrong with me.
Losing Faith in Faith
• To think
that the ruler of the universe will run to my assistance and bend
the laws of nature for me is the height of arrogance.
Losing Faith in Faith
• Without
The Law of Moses would we all be wandering around like little gods,
stealing, raping, and spilling blood whenever our vanity was offended?
Losing Faith in Faith
• Truth
does not demand belief. Scientists do not join hands every Sunday,
singing, yes, gravity is real! I will have faith! I will be strong!
I believe in my heart that what goes up, up, up must come down,
down. down. Amen! If they did, we would think they were pretty insecure
about it.
• Just say
NO to religion.
• You
keep accusing me of blasphemy all of the time, But I cannot be convicted
of a victimless crime.
• You believe
in a book that has talking animals, wizards, witches, demons, sticks
turning into snakes, food falling from the sky, people walking on
water, and all sorts of magical, absurd and primitive stories, and
you say that we are the ones that need help?
Losing Faith in Faith
• Faith
is a cop-out. It is intellectual bankruptcy. If the only way you
can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that
it can't be taken on its own merits.
Losing Faith in Faith
• I am
an atheist because there is no evidence for the existence of God.
That should be all that needs to be said about it: no evidence,
no belief.
Losing Faith in Faith
• If the
answers to prayer are merely what God wills all along, then why
pray? Losing Faith in Faith
• We were
blood brothers, pals forever. He was my very best friend. Nobody
else could see him. I now know he was just pretend.
Losing Faith in Faith
• Freethought
is respectable. Freethought is crucial. Freethought needs to be
publicized.
Losing Faith in Faith
• Freethinkers
reject faith as a valid tool of knowledge. Faith is the opposite
of reason because reason imposes very strict limits on what can
be true, and faith has no limits at all. A Great Escape into faith
is no retreat to safety. It is nothing less than surrender.
Losing Faith in Faith
• If the
answers to prayer are merely what God wills all along, then why
pray?
Losing Faith in Faith
• To think
that the ruler of the universe will run to my assistance and bend
the laws of nature for me is the height of arrogance. That implies
that everyone else (such as the opposing football team, driver,
student, parent) is de-selected, unfavored by God, and that I am
special, above it all.
Losing Faith in Faith
• Some
theists, observing that all 'effects' need a cause, assert that
God is a cause but not an effect. But no one has ever observed an
uncaused cause and simply inventing one merely assumes what the
argument wishes to prove.
Losing Faith in Faith
• I have
an Easter challenge for Christians. My challenge is simply this:
tell me what happened on Easter. I am not asking for proof. My straightforward
request is merely that Christians tell me exactly what happened
on the day that their most important doctrine was born.
Losing Faith in Faith
• Even
if it is true that all cultures share a common morality, why does
this prove a supreme intelligence? After all, don't we humanists
sometimes claim that there is a common thread of humanistic values
running through history across cultural and religious lines?
Losing Faith in Faith
• The next
time believers tell you that 'separation of church and state' does
not appear in our founding document, tell them to stop using the
word 'trinity.' The word 'trinity' appears nowhere in the bible.
Neither does Rapture, or Second Coming, or Original Sin. If they
are still unfazed (or unphrased), by this, then add Omniscience,
Omnipresence, Supernatural,Transcendence, Afterlife, Deity, Divinity,
Theology, Monotheism, Missionary, Immaculate Conception, Christmas,
Christianity, Evangelical, Fundamentalist, Methodist, Catholic,
Pope, Cardinal, Catechism, Purgatory, Penance, Transubstantiation,
Excommunication, Dogma, Chastity, Unpardonable Sin, Infallibility,
Inerrancy, Incarnation, Epiphany, Sermon, Eucharist, the Lord's
Prayer, Good Friday, Doubting Thomas, Advent, Sunday School, Dead
Sea, Golden Rule, Moral, Morality, Ethics, Patriotism, Education,
Atheism, Apostasy, Conservative (Liberal is in), Capital Punishment,
Monogamy, Abortion, Pornography, Homosexual, Lesbian, Fairness,
Logic, Republic, Democracy, Capitalism, Funeral, Decalogue, or Bible.
Losing Faith in Faith
<TOP> |
| |

• Far out in the uncharted
backwaters of the unfashionable end of the Western Spiral arm
of the Galaxy lies a small unregarded yellow sun. Orbiting this
at a distance of roughly ninety-eight million miles is an utterly
insignificant little blue-green planet whose ape-descended life
forms are so amazingly primitive that they still think digital
watches are a pretty neat idea.
The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
• Religion
has certain ideas at the heart of it which we call sacred, or holy,
or whatever. What it means is, here's an idea or a notion that you
are not allowed to say anything bad about, you're just not . Why
not? Because you're not. If somebody votes for a party that you
don't agree with you're free to argue about it as much as you like.
Everybody will have an argument but nobody feels aggrieved by it.
If somebody thinks taxes should go up or down you're free to have
an argument about it. But on the other hand if somebody says I mustn't
move a light switch on a Saturday, you say - I respect that. Why
should it be that it is perfectly legitimate to support the Labour
party or the Conservative Party, Republicans or Democrats, this
model of economics verses that, Macintosh instead of Windows, but
to have an opinion on about how the universe began, about who created
the universe, no that's holy! We're used to not challenging religious
ideas and it's very interesting how much of a furore Richard (Dawkins)
creates when he does it. Everybody gets absolutely frantic about
it because you're not allowed to say these things. Yet when you
look at it rationally there is no reason why those ideas shouldn't
be as open to debate as any other, except that we've agreed somehow
between us that they shouldn't be.
(Submitted by John
Ditchburn)
• This
is rather as if you imagine a puddle waking up one morning and thinking,
'This is an interesting world I find myself in--an interesting hole
I find myself in--fits me rather neatly, doesn't it? In fact it
fits me staggeringly well, must have been made to have me in it!'
This is such a powerful idea that as the sun rises in the sky and
the air heats up and as, gradually, the puddle gets smaller and
smaller, it's still frantically hanging on to the notion that everything's
going to be alright, because this world was meant to have him in
it, was built to have him in it; so the moment he disappears catches
him rather by surprise. I think this may be something we need to
be on the watch out for.
(Submitted by John
Ditchburn)
•
Now it is such a bizarrely improbably coincidence that anything
so mindbogglingly useful [as the Babel fish] could have evolved
by chance that some thinkers have chosen to see it as a final and
clinching proof of the non-existence of God.
The argument goes something like this: "I refuse to prove that
I exist," says God, "for proof denies faith, and without
faith I am nothing."
"But," says Man, "the Babel fish is a dead giveaway
isn't it? It could not have evolved by chance. It proves you exist,
and so therefore, by your own arguments, you don't. QED"
"Oh dear," says God, "I hadn't thought of that,"
and promptly vanishes in a puff of logic.
The Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy (book one of the Hitch
Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy series), p. 50
•
A man didn’t understand how televisions work, and was convinced
that there must be lots of little men inside the box, manipulating
images at high speed. An engineer explained to him about high frequency
modulations of the electromagnetic spectrum, about transmitters
and receivers, about amplifiers and cathode ray tubes, about scan
lines moving across and down a phosphorescent screen. The man listened
to the engineer with careful attention, nodding his head at every
step of the argument. At the end he pronounced himself satisfied.
He really did now understand how televisions work. "But I expect
there are just a few little men in there, aren’t there?"
In a parable spoofing modern creationism that Adams often told,
as retold by Richard Dawkins in "Lament for Douglas" (14
May 2001)
•
Even the sceptical mind must be prepared to accept the unacceptable
when there is no alternative. If it looks like a duck, and quacks
like a duck, we have at least to consider the possibility that we
have a small aquatic bird of the family Anatidae on our hands.
Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency (book one of the Dirk
Gently series), p. 216
•
In the beginning, the universe was created. This has made a lot
of people very angry, and is generally considered to have been a
bad move.
The Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy
• Isn't
it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe
that there are fairies at the bottom of it too?
From Last Chance To See
•
Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn
from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent
disinclination to do so.
From Last Chance To See
•
He hoped and prayed that there wasn't an afterlife. Then he realized
there was a contradiction involved here and merely hoped that there
wasn't an afterlife.
The Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy
<TOP> |
|

• WN: You came to astronomy through your interest in religion.
Do you see a way to get science and religion to play nice with each
other?
Porco: That's a big question. I know that I
derive the same kind of spiritual fulfillment from what I do, being
a planetary scientist, seeing our exploration of the solar system
come to fruition. I get such a spiritual high from it that I don't
even see the need for religion. People gravitate to religion to
feel a connection to the underlying meaning of everything. Well,
as a scientist you're always looking for the underlying meaning,
and that to me is such a spiritual life, I wish people would open
themselves up to that wonder.
Meet
Carolyn Porco, the Scientist Who Made Saturn a Rock Star
• We know exactly what it's like to
be dead. Because it is exactly like the state we inhabited before
we were born.
<TOP> |
|

• Either the soul survives death or
it does not, and there is no scientific evidence that it does.
• In my opinion, the question of God's
existence is a scientifically insoluble one.
• Machine intelligence of a human nature
could be a century away, and immortality is at least a millennium
away, if not unattainable altogether.
• Myths are stories that express meaning,
morality or motivation. Whether they are true or not is irrelevant.
• Religious faith depends on a host
of social, psychological and emotional factors that have little
or nothing to do with probabilities, evidence and logic.
• The human capacity for self-delusion
is boundless, and the effects of belief are overpowering.
• The ultimate fallacy is theological:
if God is omniscient and omnipotent, he should not need to be reminded
or inveigled into healing someone.
• We know evolution happened because
innumerable bits of data from myriad fields of science conjoin to
paint a rich portrait of life's pilgrimage.
• The fact is, there is no evidence
that that secondhand smoke causes cancer or that cell-phone use
generates brain tumors; likewise, the Gulf War Syndrome appears
to be a chimera, television does not cause violence, Satanic cults
are phantasmagorical, most recovered memories of childhood abuse
are nothing more than false memories planted by bad therapists,
silicon breast implants cause nothing more than metastatic litigation,
the drug war was lost decades ago, and the drug emperor has no clothes–he's
butt naked and it's high time someone said it. We would be well
advised to remember the law of large numbers, and to keep in mind
that we have selective memory of the most egregious events and that
most of our fears are illusory–the vaporous product of a culture
of fear of which we are both creators and victims.
from
The Science of Good and Evil
• Provisional ethics may not be ultimately
satisfying for the moral absolutist, but since there is no justification
outside of an omnipotent and omniscent God for such moral absolutism–and
there is no convincing scientific evidence that such a God exists–then
provisional ethics and provisional justice are the best we can do.
If you want more–if you need some source of moral verification
and objectification outside of yourself, your society, and you species–then
you are living in the grip of a supernatural illusion. I'm sorry,
but you can't get more without eschewing reality. Given the nature
of our universe, our world, and our selves, this is the best we
can do. Fortunately, it is enough. It leads to a moral humanity
because a moral nature is part of human nature. It exists independent
and outside of any individual because it belongs to the species.
As long as humanity continues so too will morality, provisional
though it may be.
from
The Science of Good and Evil
• I believe that morality is the natural
outcome of evolutionary and historical forces operating on both
individuals and groups. The moral feelings of doing the right thing
(such as virtuousness) or doing the wrong thing (such as guilt)
were generated by nature as part of human evolution. Although cultures
differ on what they define as right and wrong, the moral feelings
of doing the right or wrong thing are universal to all humans. Human
universals are pervasice and powerful and include at their core
the fact that we are, by nature, moral and immoral, good and evil,
altruistic and selfish, cooperative and competitive, peaceful and
bellicose, virtuous and nonvirtuous. Individuals and groups vary
on the expression of such universal traits, but everyone has them.
Most people most of the time in most circumstances are good and
do the right thing for themselves and for others. But some people
some of the time and in some circumstances are bad and do the wrong
thing for themselves and for others. As a consequence, moral principles
are provisionally true, where they apply to most people, in most
cultures, in most circumstances, most of the time...
I believe that although we live in a determined universe and are
governed by the laws of nature and forces of culture and history,
because we can never know in its entirety the near-infinite casual
net that determines our actions, we are free moral agents. And although
there is no absolute and ultimate divinity to dole out rewards and
punishments in some unspecified future, since moral principles are
provisionally true for most people most of the time in most circumstances,
provisional justice can be derived from individual responsibility
and culpability through social and cultural beliefs, customs, mores,
and laws that produce feelings of virtuosness and guilt and administer
rewards and punishments...
from
The Science of Good and Evil
<TOP>
|
|
• Channeling
is just bad ventriloquism. You use another voice, but people can
see your lips moving.
• My
favorite thing about the Internet is that you get to go into the
private world of real creeps without having to smell them.
• Technology
adds nothing to art. Two thousand years ago, I could tell you
a story, and at any point during the story I could stop, and ask,
Now do you want the hero to be kidnapped, or not? But that would,
of course, have ruined the story. Part of the experience of being
entertained is sitting back and plugging into someone else's vision.
Penn Jillette, Interview in WIRED magazine, 1993
• Every
nut who kills people has a Bible lying around. If you're looking
for violent rape imagery, the Bible's right there in your hotel
room. If you just want to look up ways to screw people up, there
it is, and you're justified because God told you to.
• I believe
that there is no God… Having taken that step, it informs every
moment of my life. I’m not greedy. I have love, blue skies,
rainbows and Hallmark cards, and that has to be enough. It has to
be enough, but it’s everything in the world and everything
in the world is plenty for me. It seems just rude to beg the invisible
for more… Believing there’s no God means I can’t
really be forgiven except by kindness and faulty memories. That’s
good; it makes me want to be more thoughtful. I have to try to treat
people right the first time around… I don’t travel in
circles where people say, “I have faith, I believe this in
my heart and nothing you can say or do can shake my faith.”
That’s just a long-winded religious way to say, “shut
up,” or another two words that the FCC likes less. But all
obscenity is less insulting than, “How I was brought up and
my imaginary friend means more to me than anything you can ever
say or do”… Believing there is no God gives me more
room for belief in family, people, love, truth, beauty, sex, Jell-o
and all the other things I can prove and that make this life the
best life I will ever have.
<TOP>
|
|

• Although I'm an atheist, I don't fear
death more than, say, sharing a room in a detox center with a sobbing
Rush Limbaugh.
• Despite what they tell you, there
are simply no moral absolutes in a complex world.
• It’s never too late to have a happy childhood.
• Liberal, shmiberal. That should be a new word. Shmiberal:
one who is assumed liberal, just because he's a professional whiner
in the newspaper. If you'll read the subtext for many of those old
strips, you'll find the heart of an old-fashioned Libertarian. And
I'd be a Libertarian, if they weren't all a bunch of tax-dodging
professional whiners.
• I will go to my grave in a state of abject endless fascination
that we all have the capacity to become emotionally involved with
a personality that doesn't exist.
<TOP>
|
|

• Question: You write that our atoms are traceable to the
big bang, which makes us a part of the universe itself. Why is this
concept important for people to understand?
Answer: If people knew these facts--really
knew them--would they still wage war on one another? Would they
still act selfishly in their personal affairs? Would they harbor
hatred for their neighbors? I do not know. Perhaps so. But you can
bet they'll think twice about it. By looking up into the vast darkness
of space, you are forced by your conscience to take pause and reflect
on your own place in the cosmos.
THE FUTURIST, November-December 2004
• People cited violation of the First
Amendment when a New Jersey schoolteacher asserted that evolution
and the Big Bang are not scientific and that Noah's ark carried
dinosaurs.
This case is not about the need to separate church and state; it's
about the need to separate ignorant, scientifically illiterate people
from the ranks of teachers.
Letter
to the Editor, "A Teacher, a Student and a Church-State Dispute",
The New York Times, December 21, 2006
• What happened before the beginning?
Astrophysicists have no idea. Or, rather, our most creative ideas
have little or no grounding in experimental science. Yet certain
type of religious person tends to assert, with a tinge of smugness,
that something must have started it all: a force greater than all
others, a source from which everything issues. A prime-mover. In
the mind of such a person, that something is, of course, God.
But what if the universe was always there, in a state or condition
we have yet to identify--a multiverse, for instance? Or what if
the universe, like its particles, just popped into existence from
nothing?
Such replies usually satisfy nobody. Nonetheless, they remind us
that ignorance is the natural state of mind for a research scientist
on the ever-shifting frontier. People who believe they are ignorant
of nothing have neither looked for, nor stumbled upon, the boundary
between what is known and unknown in the cosmos. And therein lies
a fascinating dichotomy. “The universe always was” goes
unrecognized as a legitimate answer to “What was around before
the beginning?” But for many religious people, the answer
“God always was” is the obvious and pleasing answer
to “What was around before God?”
No matter who you are, engaging in the quest to discover where and
how things began tends to induce emotional fervor--as if knowing
the beginning bestows upon you some form of fellowship with, or
perhaps governance over, all that comes later. So what is true for
life itself is no less true for the universe: knowing where you
came from is no less important than knowing where you are going.
In
the Beginning
• At nearly every public lecture that
I give on the universe, I try to reserve adequate time at the end
for questions. The succession of subjects is predictable. First,
the questions relate directly to the lecture. They next migrate
to sexy astrophysical subjects such as black holes, quasars, and
the Big Bang. If I have enough time left over to answer all questions,
and if the talk is in America, the subject eventually reaches God.
Typical questions include "Do scientists believe in God?"
"Do you believe in God?" and "Do your studies in
astrophysics make you more or less religious?"
Publishers have come to learn that there is a lot of money in God,
especially when the author is a scientist and when the book title
includes a direct juxtaposition of scientific and religious themes...Let
there be no doubt that as they are currently practiced, there is
no common ground between science and religion...The argument is
simple. I have yet to see a successful prediction about the physical
world that was inferred or extrapolated from the content of any
religious document. Indeed, I can make an even stronger statement.
Whenever people have used religious documents to make detailed predictions
about the physical world they have been famously wrong.
Holy
Wars An Astrophysicist Ponders the God Question
<TOP>
|
Thomas Joseph Leykis
|

• Caller: “So what
are your reasons for being an Atheist?”
Tom: “You don't NEED any reasons to be an Atheist. The one
who needs reasons is the one who believes in something that makes
no sense.”
Submitted by Christos
<TOP>
|
|
• So, I'll
out myself. I'm an Atheist. I don't believe in God, Gods, Godlets
or any sort of higher power beyond the universe itself, which seems
quite high and powerful enough to me. I don't believe in life after
death, channeled chat rooms with the dead, reincarnation, telekinesis
or any miracles but the miracle of life and consciousness, which
again strike me as miracles in nearly obscene abundance. I believe
that the universe abides by the laws of physics, some of which are
known, others of which will surely be discovered, but even if they
aren't, that will simply be a result, as my colleague George Johnson
put it, of our brains having evolved for life on this one little
planet and thus being inevitably limited. I'm convinced that the
world as we see it was shaped by the again genuinely miraculous,
let's even say transcendent, hand of evolution through natural selection.
Confessions of a Lonely Atheist, in New York Times Magazine,
January 14, 2001
• When I
sent out a casual and nonscientific poll of my own to a wide cast
of acquaintances, friends and colleagues, I was surprised, but not
really, to learn that maybe 60 percent claimed a belief in a God
of some sort, including people I would have bet were unregenerate
skeptics. Others just shrugged. They don't think about this stuff.
It doesn't matter to them. They can't know, they won't beat themselves
up trying to know and for that matter they don't care if their kids
believe or not.
Confessions of a Lonely Atheist, in New York Times Magazine,
January 14, 2001
• Still,
the current climate of religiosity can be stifling to nonbelievers,
and it helps now and then to cry foul. For one thing, some of the
numbers surrounding the deep religiousness of America, and the rarity
of nonbelief, should be held to the fire of skepticism, as should
sweeping statistics of any sort. Yes, Americans are comparatively
more religious than Europeans, but while the vast majority of them
may say generically that they believe in God, when asked what their
religion is, a sizable fraction, 11 percent, report "no religion,"
a figure that has more than doubled since the early 1970's and that
amounts to about 26 million people.
As [The Nation columnist Katha] Pollitt points out, when one starts
looking beneath the surface of things and adding together the out-front
atheists with the indifferent nonbelievers, you end up with a much
larger group of people than Jews, Muslims, Buddhists and Unitarians
put together.
Confessions of a Lonely Atheist, in New York Times Magazine,
January 14, 2001
• Among the
more irritating consequences of our flagrantly religious society
is the special dispensation that mainstream religions receive. We
all may talk about religion as a powerful social force, but unlike
other similarly powerful institutions, religion is not to be questioned,
criticized or mocked.
Confessions of a Lonely Atheist, in New York Times Magazine,
January 14, 2001
<TOP>
|
|

• Why
won't God heal amputees?
• The four
billion people who are not Christians look at the Christian story
in exactly the same way that you look at the Santa story, the Mormon
story and the Muslim story. In other words, there are four billion
people who stand outside of the Christian bubble, and they can see
reality clearly. The fact is, the Christian story is completely
imaginary.
• It is
time for all human beings to join together and face reality. We
must break free of the irrationality and understand that every human
“god” is imaginary. This includes God, Allah, Vishnu
and all the rest. We must understand that the author is incorrect
when he states that, “The atheist alternative is a world in
which right and wrong are ultimately matters of opinion, and in
which we are finally accountable to no one but ourselves.”
He is incorrect because this is not “the atheist alternative.”
This is, in fact, the reality of our world. This is how our world
has always been, and how it always will be. And let us be thankful
for that. For if we followed all of the commandments of the “god”
in the Bible, we would have to kill half of the people living in
America today.
• How many
gods do you believe in?
Ask that question in America, and the answer is usually “one”…but
not always. Depending on which poll you read, anywhere from 2% to
10% of Americans are atheists.
I am an atheist. But what is an atheist?
There is no simple answer to that question. Even atheists don’t
agree. I can only speak for myself. I do not believe in any supernatural
being, including the god of the bible. I don’t believe in
any god or goddess that has ever been worshipped by a human being.
It’s safe to say that you don’t believe in Zeus or Ra
either and yet you probably can’t understand why I don’t
believe in the Judeo-Christian god.
For me the answer is this: the bible doesn’t make sense. The
bible is a book written approximately two thousand years ago by
uneducated, superstitious men who knew nothing about physics or
science. They didn’t understand how the world works, so they
made up stories to help them feel less afraid.
Sure, some of the Ten Commandments are good rules to follow: don’t
lie, don’t steal, and don’t kill people. These are good
rules of thumb, like the Golden Rule. But I don’t believe
the commandments were dictated by a god.
The fact that the God of the bible is okay with people owning slaves
is proof that the bible wasn’t written by a god: it was written
by men who owned slaves. If god truly wrote (or at least inspired
men to write) the bible, don’t you think he would have proclaimed
in a deep god-like voice, “Slavery is wrong and I will not
tolerate it any longer.”? It seems logical that a loving god
wouldn’t want any of his people to be enslaved by others.
I realize I am not going to change anyone’s beliefs with just
one example, but I invite you to do some research of your own. That’s
how I came to believe the things I believe and don’t believe;
by reading and thinking for myself.
Atheists are not evil, devil-worshipping pedophile criminals. For
the most part, atheists are hard-working, patriotic, law-abiding
citizens. We pay our taxes, love our families, and worry about the
price of gas. We respect the rights of others and we try to love
our neighbors.
I hope you will do the same.
<TOP>
|
|

• Evolution and religion may not be
at war, but no agreement seems possible in their most basic tenets.
Traditional religions are based on dualism, and evolution is strictly
materialist. Dualism is founded on a belief in the supernatural.
The materialist position forms the basis for belief in naturalism,
which holds that "the empirical procedure of exploration and
verification is the only known reliable method of discovering truth"
(Smith, 1952). For the materialist, the supernatural has no basis
in reality but instead is an unwarranted distraction brought about
through mythology.
• The proposition that one must "believe
in evolution" as people blindly believe in God is easily discounted.
Still, much of modern evolutionary biology today is sprinkled with
tinges of dualism. Notions of progress, purpose, emergent properties,
optimality, and increasing complexity in evolution all contain vague
hints of dualism, and are debated in symposia and published in books
and journals by today's most active evolutionists. These architects
of modern naturalism have traditionally shunned the ideas of religions,
but to what degree they discount the supernatural remains to be
seen.
• We still live in a world, however,
that is predominantly theist, particularly in America where 95%
of the citizens believe in God (according to the Gallup Poll of
2001). In this environment, many evolutionary biologists are reluctant
to carry the implications of Darwinism to their logical extent.
Theists vote, pay the taxes, and support the research institutions
where most naturalists work. Theists do not appreciate hearing the
vulgar truth of evolutionary theory, that mankind is no fallen angel,
has no immortal soul, nor free will, and was not specially created.
So what is a naturalist evolutionary biologist to do in this climate?
<TOP>
|
|

• Nah, there's no bigger atheist than
me. Well, I take that back. I'm a cancer screening away from going
agnostic and a biopsy away from full-fledged Christian.
Details magazine, October 1997, p. 78
• The God's honest truth is that I'm
probably funnier, but he's smarter. Here's the thing about Stern
– he's really a smart guy. He's nutty. He's outrageous. He's
all those things, but he's also a very smart guy.
• The country is run by extremists because
the moderates have shit to do.
<TOP>
|
| |
•
Faith is what credulity becomes when
it finally achieves escape velocity from the constraints of terrestrial
discourse.
• Whatever
their imagined source, the doctrines of modern religions are no
more tenable than those which, for lack of adherents, were cast
upon the scrap heap of mythology millennia ago.
• The
idea, therefore, that religious faith is somehow a sacred human
convention—distinguished, as it is, both by the extravagance
of its claims and by the paucity of its evidence—is really
too great a monstrosity to be appreciated in all its glory.
• Religious
faith represents so uncompromising a misuse of the power of our
minds that it forms a kind of perverse, cultural singularity—a
vanishing point beyond which rational discourse proves impossible.
• Religion
is nothing more than bad concepts held in place of good ones for
all time. It is the denial—at once full of hope and full of
fear—of the vastitude of human ignorance.
• The
history of Christianity is principally a story of mankind's misery
and ignorance rather than of its requited love of God.
• Judaism
is as intrinsically divisive, as ridiculous in its literalism, and
as at odds with the civilizing insights of modernity as any other
religion.
• There
are ideas within Buddhism that are so incredible as to render the
dogma of the virgin birth plausible by comparison.
• It
is time that scientists and other public intellectuals observed
that the contest between faith and reason is zero-sum.
• There
is no question but that nominally religious scientists like Francis
Collins and Kenneth R. Miller are doing lasting harm to our discourse
by the accommodations they have made to religious irrationality.
• A
person can be a God-fearing Christian on Sunday and a working scientist
come Monday morning, without ever having to account for the partition
that seems to have erected itself in his head while he slept.
• The
difference between science and religion is the difference between
a willingness to dispassionately consider new evidence and new arguments,
and a passionate unwillingness to do so.
• Given the astounding
number of galaxies and potential worlds arrayed
overhead, the complexities of life on earth and the advances in
our
ethical discourse over the last 2,000 years, the world's religions
offer a view of reality that is now so utterly impoverished as to
scarcely constitute a view of reality at all.
Submitted by Robert
Umbehant
<TOP>
|
|

• I came to the conclusion
[that] I do not believe in the existence of a god or in the hereafter.
• Avoiding offense means
that we don't accept each other as equals.
• Every time I went on
TV I got a threat.
• I confront the European
elite's self-image as tolerant 'while under their noses women are
living like slaves.
• I do not believe in God,
angels and the hereafter.
• I turned around and saw
this sweet, young Dutch guy, about 24 years old. With freckles!
And he was like, 'Madam, I hope the mujahedeen get you and kill
you.'
• Colonisation and slavery
have created a sentiment of culpability in the West that leads people
to adulate foreign traditions. This is a lazy, even racist attitude.
<TOP> |
|

• [interviewer]: You know, a lot of
filmmakers seem to be either very literary-based or else very movie-based
who just watch movies. You seem to really be developing this new
visual style that suits each story. You know, how did you find this
third road?
DA: It's probably because I'm Godless. And so I've had to make my
God, and my God is narrative filmmaking, which is -- ultimately
what my God becomes, which is what my mantra becomes, is the theme.
|
|

• Just got back from the Q2 wrap party
in vegas that Activision threw for us. Having a reasonable grounding
in statistics and probability and no belief in luck, fate, karma,
or god(s), the only casino game that interests me is blackjack.
Playing blackjack properly is a test of personal discipline. It
takes a small amount of skill to know the right plays and count
the cards, but the hard part is making yourself consistantly behave
like a robot, rather than succumbing to your gut instincts.
<TOP>
|
|
• At the end of the day, if there was
indeed some Body or presence standing there to judge me, I hoped
I would be judged on whether I had lived a true life, not on whether
I believed in a certain book, or whether I'd been baptized. If there
was indeed a God at the end of my days, I hoped he didn't say, "But
you were never a Christian, so you're going the other way from heaven."
If so, I was going to reply, "You know what? You're right.
Fine."
• Interviewer: "For a miracle man,
you're not very religious."
Armstrong: "I don't have anything against organized religion
per se. We all need something in our lives. I personally just have
not accepted that belief. But I'm one of the few."
• Armstrong is deeply suspicious of
organised religion ... Armstrong believes it is possible to be a
good person while not believing. "I think we all have obligations
to be good, honest, hard-working, caring and compassionate,"
he says. "You have to try and it won't always be easy but you
try your best. I do not believe that because you are not prepared
to submit yourself to a god or a higher being, that when you get
to the end of the road, you will be sent down. I'm not prepared
to believe that."
• If there was a god, I'd still have
both nuts.
• The night before brain surgery, I
thought about death. I searched out my larger values, and I asked
myself, if I was going to die, did I want to do it fighting and
clawing or in peaceful surrender? What sort of character did I hope
to show? Was I content with myself and what I had done with my life
so far? I decided that I was essentially a good person, although
I could have been better--but at the same time I understood that
the cancer didn't care.
I asked myself what I believed. I had never prayed a lot. I hoped
hard, I wished hard, but I didn't pray. I had developed a certain
distrust of organized religion growing up, but I felt I had the
capacity to be a spiritual person, and to hold some fervent beliefs.
Quite simply, I believed I had a responsiblity to be a good person,
and that meant fair, honest, hardworking, and honorable. If I did
that, if I was good to my family, true to my friends, if I gave
back to my community or to some cause, if I wasn't a liar, a cheat,
or a thief, then I believed that should be enough. At the end of
the day, if there was indeed some Body or presence standing there
to judge me, I hoped I would be judged on whether I had lived a
true life, not on whther I believed in a certain book, or whether
I'd been baptized. If there was indeed a God at the end of my days,
I hoped he didn't say, "But you were never a Christian, so
you're going the other way from heaven." If so, I was going
to reply, "You know what? You're right. Fine."
I believed, too, in the doctors and the medicine and the surgeries--I
believed in that. I believed in them. A person like Dr. Einhorn
[his oncologist], that's someone to believe in, I thought, a person
with the mind to develop an experimental treatment 20 years ago
that now could save my life. I believed in the hard currency of
his intelligence and his research.
Beyond that, I had no idea where to draw the line between spiritual
belief and science. But I knew this much: I believed in belief,
for its own shining sake. To believe in the face of utter hopelessness,
every article of evidence to the contrary, to ignore apparent catastrophe--what
other choice was there? We do it every day, I realized. We are so
much stronger than we imagine, and belief is one of the most valiant
and long-lived human characteristics. To believe, when all along
we humans know that nothing can cure the briefness of this life,
that there is no remedy for our basic mortality, that is a form
of bravery.
To continue believing in yourself, believing in the doctors, believing
in the treatment, believing in whatever I chose to believe in, that
was the most important thing, I decided. It had to be.
Without belief, we would be left with nothing but an overwhelming
doom, every single day. And it will beat you. I didn't fully see,
until the cancer, how we fight every day against the creeping negatives
of the world, how we struggle daily against the slow lapping of
cynicism. Dispiritedness and disappointment, these were the real
perils of life, not some sudden illness or cataclysmic millennium
doomsday. I knew now why people fear cancer: because it is a slow
and inevitable death, it is the very definition of cynicism and
loss of spirit.
So, I believed.
It's Not About the Bike: My Journey Back to Life pp. 116-118
<TOP> |
|
• I've always been an atheist. Science
explains everything. There is no meaning in life except to be the
best at something. If only I could be the best at something, perhaps
my parents would love me.
• Religion is silly. When you're dead,
you turn into a source for future flowers and plants.... I don't
know what's on the other side of death and it scares me. Darkness
and nothingness scare me. I'd rather face the miseries of my day-to-day
life than turn into darkness.
• Allow me to confirm that yes, I am
a diehard atheist, and have been since I was about 5 and discovered
to my annoyance that there was no santa claus, no easter bunny,
and no tooth fairy. well, that was it for me - I resolved then and
there that no one was going to sucker ME into believing in any more
invisible characters with superpowers! as I grew older, the more
I learned about the histories of organized religions, the more convinced
I became that (a) people around the world are extremely gullible,
and (b) i need to get off my ass and start a religion of my own!
• I'm such an atheist it's not even
funny, and I will punch holes into any religion if you give me half
a chance. I think it's sad that people in this day and age can still
be bamboozled into believing in "Holy Ghosts" and "Angels
in Heaven" and the like. Everyone laughed at the Al-Quaeda
idiots who believed they'd be getting 70 virgins when they got to
heaven, but cripeys, Christianity looks just as silly to people
of other religions!
<TOP>
|
|

• Sunshine is a film that highlights
the fragility of the planet and how briefly we are on it, but how
much we contribute to its future. It got me thinking about life
and religion, science vs religion and all that. I was verging on
being an agnostic and this film confirmed any of the atheistic beliefs
I had.
• As part of his research, he spent time with Brian Cox,
a leading astrophysicist. Surely you don't need a knowledge of physics
to play a physicist?
For us lay people, it's hard to grasp these
ideas, that everything emerged from the Big Bang and nobody knows
why, or what 95 per cent of the universe is made of. I was never
going to understand that. When I talked to Brian, I wanted to get
a brief glimpse inside his head and imagine what it means to be
dealing with all these massive profound thoughts all the time, and
how it affects your interaction with other people. They're building
this particle accelerator, which is 25 km long and they're going
to smash protons together to create the conditions of the Big Bang.
But all I could do with these guys was hang out with them and ask
really idiotic questions over and over...
Murphy's awe-struck tone in talking about science seems perfectly
genuine. It's a real-life mirror of the awe Capa expresses when,
in the film's stunning climax, he stares right into the heart of
the sun, and you realise why they cast Murphy in the role - not
because he makes a convincing scientist, but because he makes the
perfect visionary. He even talks like one, though eloquently: While
Capa would be, I'm sure, an atheist and would believe only in science,
at the end of the movie he's overwhelmed by the beauty of the universe
and it becomes to him something other than science. Einstein talked
about 'God', and a lot of theologians latched on to that, but he
wasn't talking about religion - he was talking about the way science
and physics work coherently, in a beautiful and delicate system.
I think Capa suddenly sees his place in the universe like that.
It's not a religious thing. It's more a communion with nature.
Interview in The Independent (UK), March 31, 2007 |
|

• The Onion:
Is there a God?
Angelina Jolie: Hmm... For some people. I hope so, for them. For
the people who believe in it, I hope so. There doesn't need to be
a God for me. There's something in people that's spiritual, that's
godlike. I don't feel like doing things just because people say
things, but I also don't really know if it's better to just not
believe in anything, either.
• I don't believe in guilt, I believe
in living on impulse as long as you never intentionally hurt another
person, and don't judge people in your life. I think you should
live completely free.
• Everyone got kind of crazy with me
mentioning I was in love with a woman.
• If I think more about death than some
other people, it is probably because I love life more than they
do.
• There's something about death that
is comforting. The thought that you could die tomorrow frees you
to appreciate your life now.
• When other little girls wanted to
be ballet dancers I kind of wanted to be a vampire.
<TOP>
|
| |
|
|